International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 1, January 2020 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Analytical Thinking Process Of Student In Proving Mathematical Argument

[Full Text]



Arif Hidayatul Khusna



analytical thinking, proof, mathematical argument



In mathematics there are two concepts of thinking, analytical thinking and procedural thinking. Analytical thinking is needed because the objects studied in mathematics are abstract. Theorems, Definitions, and Lemmas are objects in mathematics. the arguments in this research are arguments in the form of definitions, theorems, and lemmas. The research subjects were 5th -semester students of the Mathematics Education Department. The research instrument is a test question in the form of a description. The problem consists of one problem that asks students to prove a mathematical argument that exists in set material. The results of the study show that there are two subjects use the pre-analytical thinking process which is characterized by the process of simplifying the theorem, determining the proof plan regardless of the conclusions of the theorem. One subject uses an analytical thinking process characterized by a process of simplifying theorems, determining the proof plan by considering the conclusions of the theorem.



[1] W. P. Thurston, “On proof and progress in mathematics,” Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 1994.
[2] D. O. Tall, “The transition to formal thinking in mathematics,” Math. Educ. Res. J., 2008.
[3] J. D. Depree, Introduction to Real Analysis Introduction to Real Analysis. 2012.
[4] R. Maya and U. Sumarmo, “Mathematical Understanding and Proving Abilities: Experiment With Undergraduate Student By Using Modified Moore Learning Approach,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 2, no. 2, Nov. 2016.
[5] R. M. Dudley, Real analysis and probability. 2018.
[6] K. S. Perbowo and T. R. Pradipta, “Pemetaan Kemampuan Pembuktian Matematis Sebagai Prasyarat Mata Kuliah Analisis Real Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika,” KALAMATIKA J. Pendidik. Mat., 2017.
[7] S. Syamsuri, P. Purwanto, S. Subanji, and S. Irawati, “Using APOS Theory Framework: Why Did Students Unable To Construct a Formal Proof?,” Int. J. Emerg. Math. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 135, Aug. 2017.
[8] R. B. Ferri, “Mathematical thinking styles and their influence on teaching and learning mathematics,” 12th Int. Congr. Math. …, 2012.
[9] S. Vinner, “The pseudo-conceptual and the pseudo-analytical thought processes in mathematics learning,” Educ. Stud. Math., 1997.
[10] D. E. RUMELHART, “Psychology - Cognitive,” Science (80-. )., vol. 198, no. 4319, pp. 816–817, 1977.
[11] J. K. Robbins, “Problem solving, reasoning, and analytical thinking in a classroom environment.,” Behav. Anal. Today, 2014.
[12] S. Kita, “How representational gestures help speaking,” in Language and Gesture, 2010.
[13] R. R. Greenwald and I. J. Quitadamo, “A mind of their own: Using inquiry-based teaching to build critical thinking skills and intellectual engagement in an undergraduate neuroanatomy course,” J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ., 2014.
[14] R. E. Nisbett, I. Choi, K. Peng, and A. Norenzayan, “Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition,” Psychol. Rev., 2001.
[15] L. Sydonie, “Creative thinking,” Learn. Disabil. Today, 2010.
[16] G. Hanna and M. de Villiers, “ICMI Study 19: Proof and proving in mathematics education,” ZDM - Int. J. Math. Educ., 2008.
[17] L. Lamport, “How to Write a Proof,” Am. Math. Mon., 2006.
[18] J. T. Kinard and A. Kozulin, Rigorous Mathematical Thinking. 2012.
[19] A. Selden, J. Selden, and A. Benkhalti, “Proof Frameworks: A Way to Get Started,” PRIMUS, 2018.
[20] D. Hardman and L. Macchi, Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making. 2005.