IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
Scopus/Elsevier
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 1, January 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Impact of Female Director on Firm Performance in Emerging Economy

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Shubhanker Yadav, Dr. Anindita Chakraborty

 

KEYWORDS

BSE, Corporate Governance, Female Director, Financial Performance, Indian Listed Firm, Panel data econometrics, Companies Act 2013.

 

ABSTRACT

This study examines the impact of female director on the firm market based financial performance of listed Indian firms in an econometric modelling approach. Using a firm year unit of analysis, a sample of 60 BSE listed companies across various industries has been studied over a period of twelve financial years, namely FY 2006–2007 to FY 2017–2018. Using panel data analysis, the percentage of female directors on corporate board is taken as the independent variable and firm performance measured by two market based financial performance indicator Q (Tobin's Q) and Mv/Ev (Market Value to Enterprise value, as the dependent variables. The primary results of the study using panel least squares (PLS) and random effects (RE) estimation models point towards a positive and significant correlation between the percentage of female directors and Tobin q. However, results are found to be more strong when Mv/Ev been used as firm financial performance. The findings of the study indicate that the number of companies with no female directors is reducing across the 12 years of study. It may be due to the external pressure created by the new corporate governance code 2013, also, the number of companies with one or more, number of female directors been seen as increasing during the period of study. Still, very few companies can be seen keeping one-third of the director as female director; this could be due to the non-availability of a female director.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2009).Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.
[2] Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[3] Bøhren, Ø., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2007). Aligned, informed, and decisive: characteristics of value-creating boards. Working Paper
[4] Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: a comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3, 105–125.
[5] Campbell, K., &Mınguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.
[6] Carter, D., D'Souza, F. P., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2007). The diversity of corporate board committees and firm financial performance. Available at SSRN 972763.
[7] Carter, D., Simkins, B., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53
[8] Catalyst (2004). The bottom line: connecting corporate performance and gender diversity.
[9] Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2011). Corporate board gender diversity and stock performance: the competence gap or Institutional investor bias? North Carolina Law Review, 89, 809–838.
[10] Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader, S. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance, 11(2), 102–111.
[11] Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.
[12] Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106
[13] Francoeur, C., Labelle, R., & Desgagne, B. S. (2008). Gender diversity in corporate governance and top management. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 83–95.
[14] Kaldor, N. (1966). Marginal productivity and the macro-economic theories of distribution: comment on Samuelson and Modigliani. The Review of Economic Studies, 33(4), 309-319.
[15] OECD. (2004). OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publication
[16] Larcker, D. F., & Tayan, B. (2011). Corporate governance matters: a closer look at organizational choices and their consequences. Upper Saddle River: FT Press
[17] Pearce, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (1991). The relative power of CEOs and boards of directors: associations with corporate performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 135–153.
[18] Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2010). The relationship between corporate governance and financial performance: an empirical study of Canadian firms. The Business Review, Cambridge, 16(2), 35–41.
[19] Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.
[20] Sanan, N, J. (2016). Board gender diversity and firm performance: evidence from India. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 11.
[21] Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors and corporate boards: a review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.
[22] Yadav, Shubhanker. and Chakraborty, Anindita. (2016). Corporate Collapses in India: Issues and Challenges. Saaransh: RKG Journal of Management, 7(2), 47-54.