International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 2, February 2020 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Syntax Validation Based On Work-Based Learning Model According To Respondents' Assessment

[Full Text]



Hastuti Marlina, Reno Renaldi, Ambiyar, Nizwardi Jalinus, Fahmi Rizal



Syntax, Validation, Work-Based Learning



This study aims to assess the validation of the syntax construct of the work-based learning model that was developed based on a modification of the basic work-based learning syntax by Hobbs and Siswanto. The research methodology uses 4D development procedures (Define, Design, Develop and Disseminate). This validation test phase is the Develop stage. Respondents numbered 25 people. Data collection using a questionnaire with a semantic differential scale. Syntactic construct validation analysis uses Aikens'V and SMART PLS to determine the uniqueness of a model. The results of the analysis revealed that the syntax construct was designed by Valid and had a unique model. The results of this study are used for the next stage of development, namely Desseminte. Where a valid Syntax model will be tested to measure the knowledge and abilities of midwifery study program students in midwifery care learning II.



Triyono, M. (2017). Tantangan Revolusi Industri Ke 4 (i4.0) Bagi Pendidikan Vokasi. Seminar Nasional Vokasi Dan Teknologi (Semnasvoktek)., 4, 1–5.
[2] Tjandrawinata, R. R. (2016). Industri 4 . 0 : Revolusi Industri Abad Ini dan Pengaruhnya pada Bidang Kesehatan dan Bioteknologi, 29(1), 31–39
[3] Jalinus, N. (2011). Pengembangan pendidikan teknologi dan kejuruan dan hubungan dunia kerja.pdf. Pendidikan Vokasi, 1(1), 25–34.
[4] Jama, J. (2010). Transformasi Teknologi pada Pendidikan Kejuruan. Makalah Seminar Internasiona, p. Aptekindo Padang.
[5] Kemenristekdikti. (2016). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Vokasi. Kemenristekdikti.
[6] Ismail, S., Mohaffyza, M., Omar, N., & Mei, Y. (2015). A Comparison of the Work-based Learning Models and Implementation in Training Institutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204(November 2014), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.153
[7] Brennan, L. (2005). Integrating Work- Based Learning into Higher Education A Guide to Good Practice.
[8] Marshall, J. E. (2012). Developing midwifery practice through work-based learning: An exploratory study. Nurse Education in Practice, 12(5), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.06.003
[9] Tjahjono, B, Esplugues, C, Ares, E, Pelaez, G. (2017). What does Industry 4 . 0 mean to Supply Chain ? Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1175–1182.
[10] Tjandrawinata, R. R. (2016). Industri 4 . 0 : Revolusi Industri Abad Ini dan Pengaruhnya pada Bidang Kesehatan dan Bioteknologi, 29(1), 31–39.
[11] WHO. (2014). Midwifery educator core competencies. EBOOK.
[12] ICM (2012). Teaching and Learning in a Competency-Based Curriculum. Versi elektronik diakses dari http://www.internationalmidwives.org ada 15 agustus 2018
[13] Ikatan Bidan Indonesia. (2015). Kualitas Bidan Indonesia. Rapat Kerja IBI. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.205.1.76a
[14] Hobbs, D. (2018). Georgia Work Based Learning Manual. Standars an Guidelines (Juli 2018). Georgia: The Georgia Department of Education.
[15] Siswanto, B. T. (2012a). Model Penyelenggaraan Work Based Learning pada Pendidian Vokasi Diploma III otomotif. Pendidikan Vokasi, 1(2), 11–26.
[16] Siswanto, B. T. (2012b). Pengaruh Model Penyelenggaraan Work-Based Learning Rolling Terpadu Terhadap Aspek-Aspek Kualitas Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Pendiidkan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 21(1), 67–73.