IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 2, February 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Builders Performance Improvement With Briefing In Jember

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Amri Gunasti, Amalina Maryam Zakiyyah, Adelia Maris, Diah Yulisetiarini

 

KEYWORDS

Performance, Briefing, Builders, t test

 

ABSTRACT

One of the world phenomenon of construction is still a gap between the performance of builders, which is expected by the foreman, with the reality on the ground. The results of empirical studies state that guidance can improve performance. The purpose of this study was to test the performance indicators Builders, once briefed. Research using One group pretest-posttest design. Initial assessment by the foreman, to Builders (pre-test), conducted during one month. Then the Builders treated in the form of guidance for a month, and given the assessment (post-test), then t test. The results showed that, Indicator: 1) target the jobs and duties of the foreman, can Builders met, 2) Builders always try to produce the quality of work is good, compared with other colleagues, 3) Builders always work, in accordance with quality standards, which have been set by the foreman, 4) All jobs during this time, Builders can do, and the results are in accordance with the time, which had been planned, the performance decreases, after being given treatment, in the form of directives. Indicators: 1) The quantity of work Builders are in accordance with the standards of work expected by the foreman, 2) The results of the performance of Builders sometimes exceed the target given by the foreman, 3) Builders willing given additional quantity of work outside working hours if necessary, 4) Builders are always trying to reach the target employment has been established by the foreman, 5) Builders always focus on finishing the job, although foreman was no place, 6) In completing the work Builders always take the initiative without waiting for orders from the foreman, 7) the quantity of work Builders exceed the average Builders others, 8) Builders doing work with the calculating, meticulous, 9) Builders have the appropriate skills to work and tasks Builders do now, 10) the quality of work that has been set by the Overseer can be achieved properly and optimally,11) Builders skilled in their work and have the initiative to help colleagues with, 12) Builders always reduce the error rate in the works, 13) Quality of work Builders far better than Builders another 14 Builders adhere to all the rules and procedures set out in the work , 15) Builders not procrastinate, 16) Based on the absence of data, Builders come home from work, 17) Efficiency Builders time in completing the work exceeds the average of other Builders, performance improved after the treatment is given in the form of directives.

 

REFERENCES

[1]. Amri Gunasti, Penilaian Standar Kompetensi Kerja Tukang BesiorBeton Pada Proyek Konstruksi Di Kabupaten Jember, Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil Universitas Madura Vol. 2 No. 2 Desember 2017 ISSN 2527-5542, pp 13-17
[2]. Amri Gunasti, Penerapan Personal Protectif Equipment (PPE) Pada Proyek Konstruksi Di Kabupaten Jember, Jurnal Rekayasa Teknik Sipil Universitas Madura Vol. 3 No.1 Juni 2018 ISSN 2527-5542, pp 7-14
[3]. Amri Gunasti, Penilaian Kinerja Tukang Dan Harapan Foreman Dalam Proyek Konstruksi. Jurnal Penelitian IPTEKS, 2(1) (2017), pp. 77-90
[4]. Amri Gunasti, Kajian Tentang Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Tukang Pada Proyek Konstruksi, Prosiding SemNas Hasil-Hasil Penelitian KEMENRISTEKDIKTI, September 2016, ISBN 978-602-6988-22-5, pp. 100-110
[5]. Prisky Amalia Merike Cendera Kasih, Bambang Swasto Sunuharyo, Kusdi Rahardjo Pengaruh Karakteristik Biografis Dan Karakteristik Pekerjaan Terhadap Kinerja, Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi, Univeritas Brawijaya Malang
[6]. Mcshane, steven l., and mary ann von glinov. 2010. Organizational behavior “5th edition, mcgraw-hill, international edition.
[7]. Subijanto dan Siswo Wiratno, Pusat Penelitian dan Kebijakan, Balitbang Kemdikbud, Analisis Kinerja Badan Akreditasi Nasional SekolahorMadrasah, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 18, Nomor 3, September 2012 pp 310-318
[8]. Yulistiana Rudianti, Hanny Handiyani, Luknis Sabri, Peningkatan Kinerja Perawat Pelaksana Melalui Komunikasi Organisasi Di Ruang Rawat Inap Rumah Sakit, Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, Volume 16 No.1, Maret 2013, hal 25-32 pISSN 1410-4490, eISSN 2354-9203
[9]. Ujang Wawan Sam Adinata, Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Motivasi, Dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan KJKS BMT Tamzis Bandung, Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis & Entrepreneurship Vol. 9, No. 2, Oktober 2015, 136-157 ISSN 2443-2121
[10]. Robbins, Stephen P. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Prehallindo.
[11]. Darma, Agus. Manajemen Supervisi, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa, 2003
[12]. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Method), Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015
[13].Amri Gunasti, Isti Fadah, Competence Enhancement Strategy At Uncertified Builders Group, Pringtali village, Jember, International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research Volume 8, Issue 12, December 2019, ISSN 2277-8616
[14]. Roni Saputra, Statistik Terapan Dalam Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat, Sumatra Barat: STIKES Perintis, 2013