|
Effects Of Situational Leadership, Work Motivation And Cohesiveness On Work Satisfaction And Employment Performance (A Case Study In Education And Cultural Office In Konawe Regency)
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Suriyadi, Dedy Takdir Syaifuddin, Dasmin Sidu, Mursidin
KEYWORDS
Situational Leadership, Work Motivation, Cohesiveness, Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance
ABSTRACT
This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of situational leadership style, work motivation, and cohesiveness on job satisfaction and employee performance. The population in this study were all civil servants in the scope of Konawe District Office of education and culture with a total of 120 ASNs and all of them were used as respondents. The analytical tool used is the SEM with the AMOS program. Based on the results of the study, several conclusions can be formulated as follows: (1) Situational leadership, work motivation and group cohesiveness have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction. This means that the better situational leadership, the higher the work motivation and group cohesiveness, the higher employee job satisfaction will be, (2) Situational leadership, group cohesiveness has a positive and significant effect on employee performance while the effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance is not significant. This means that increasing situational leadership and group cohesiveness have a significant impact on performance improvement while work motivation and job satisfaction are not significant and (3) Job satisfaction does not mediate the influence of situational leadership, work motivation and group cohesiveness on employee performance.
REFERENCES
[1] Amstrong, Michael. 2006. Performance Management: Key Strategies and Practical Guildelines. 3 RD Edition. London: Kogan Page and Philadelpia.
[2] Al-Rawi, Khalid. 2008. Cohesiveness within teamwork: the relationship to performance effectiveness – case study. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 92-106.
[3] Aoyagi, Mark W, Richard H. Cox a & Richard T. McGuire. 2008. Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Sport: Relationships with Leadership, Team Cohesion, and Athlete Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 25-41.
[4] Dailey C.Robert. 1978. Relationship Between Locus of Control, Perceived Group Cohesiveness, and Satisfaction With Cowokers. Journal Psycologi Reports, Vol42,pp 311-316.
[5] Dessler, Gary. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Edisi kesepuluh jilid I. Terjemahan Paramita Rahayu. Klaten : Intan Sejati.
[6] Dessler, Gary. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terj. Jakarta: PT Indeks.
[7] Hersey, Paul dan Kenneth Blanchard, 1995. Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi: Pendayaagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Penerjemah: Agus Dharma, Jakarta: Erlangga.
[8] Hersey, Paul dan Kenneth H. Blanchard, 1996, Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi: Pendayagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi Keempat, Alih Bahasa: Agus Dharma, Jakarta, Erlangga
[9] Hersey, Paul dan Kenneth. H. Blanchard. 2000. Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi : Pendayagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia, Terjemahan Agus Dharma, Erlangga, Jakarta.
[10] Ivancevich M, Konopaske dan Matteson. 2014. Perilaku dan Manajemen Organisasi, edisi 7 jilid 1. Erlangga : Jakarta.
[11] Mathis, Robert L dan John H Jackson, 2002. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Buku 2 Jilid Pertama. Alih Bahasa Benyamin Molari. Jakarta : Salemba Empat.
[12] Nelson, D.L dan J.C. Quick, 2006. Organizatonal Behavior Foundations Realities and Challenges, Thompson South Western, United States of America.
[13] Robbins, Steven. Et.al.2006. Perilaku Organisasi Edisi 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[14] Robbins dan Judge. 2007. Perilaku Organisasi, Edisi Duabelas. Penerbit Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
[15] Augusty, Ferdinand. 2006. Metode Penelitian Manajemen: Pedoman Penelitian untuk skripsi, Tesis dan Disertai Ilmu Manajemen. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
[16] Hair, Jr., J.F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R.L. dan Black, W.C., 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. six Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey 07458.
[17] Hidayati, Siti, Utami, H.N, dan Prasetya A. 2015. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Situasional Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Pada Karyawan Divisi Tower & Aproach Terminal (TWRA & APP-TMA) AirNav Indonesia Kantor Cabang Aero Traffic Control Soekarno Hatta). Journal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB). Vol. 1. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
[18] Hidayat, Nurul, Hamid D, Ruhana I. 2016. Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Situasional Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja (Studi Kasus Pada Karyawan PT. Taspen (Persero) KUC Malang. Tesis. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya.
[19] R.Okky Satria, dan Husaeri Priatna, (2012). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan, Komitmen, dan Kepuasan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Journal, Bisnis Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Enterpreneurship Vol.6 Nomor 2 Oktober 2012 85 – 93 ISSN 2443 – 0633.
[20] Schmelz Deeter R. Dawn, Kennedy Norman Karen. 2003. Patient Care Teams and Customer Satisfaction: the Role of Team Cohesion. Journal of Services Marketing. Vol.17 No. 7, pp 666-684.
[21] Schmelz Deeter R. Dawn, Kennedy Norman Karen. 2003. Patient Care Teams and Customer Satisfaction: the Role of Team Cohesion. Journal of Services Marketing. Vol.17 No. 7, pp 666-684.
[22] Tekleab, A.G., Quigley, N.R. and Tesluk, P.E. 2009. A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 170-205.
[23] Tarandung DT Chrys. 2016. The Impact of Motivation, Participation and Competence of Employee Performance in Food Security and Agricultural Extension Office of East Bolaang Mongondow District. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi. Vol. 16, No. 2.
[24] Timothy and Gian Casimir. 2006. The Relationship Between Leadership and Follower In-role Performance and Satisfaction with the Leader (The Mediating effects of empowerment and trust in the leader). Australia: La Trobe University.
|
