IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 5 - Issue 2, February 2016 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Evaluating The Impact Of Novice Students’ Sketches On Their Mental Imagery

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

F. Helmi, K. A. M. Khaidzir

 

KEYWORDS

visualization, design transformation, mental imagery, sketch, and reinterpretation.

 

ABSTRACT

'Reinterpretation' is one of the activities that occur in visualization, the role of reinterpretation is restructuring half form idea, and it can be performed with applying sketch as a useful tool, and creation, development, evaluation, communication and sharing of ideas can be facilitated by sketching. ‘Reinterpretation’ basically is the outcome of the lateral thinking process. Investigating of the reinterpretation of some designers indicate that externalizing a design may not be the solitary approach of designing visually and for expert architects sketching is not a crucial action in the early stages of conceptual designing. Moreover, experts could progress in design by thinking only. However, novice students have problem in reinterpreting patterns in their mental image whether tools such as sketch could help in the better performance of the reinterpretation process. This paper raises a fundamental question that if the sketch of novice students can support their mental imagery, in order to answer this question, this paper uses documentary method to investigate the previous studies in this field. Finally in accordance to the weakness of novice’s sketches, this study concluded that their sketches could not support their mental imagery.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Roozenburg, N. F. and Eekels, J. Product design: fundamentals and methods. Wiley Chichester, 1995.

[2] Eckert, C. et al. Ambiguity is a double-edged sword: Similarity references in communication. (2003),

[3] De Bono, E. De Bono's thinking course. Pearson Education, 2006.

[4] Garner, S. W. Drawing and designing: the case for reappraisal. Journal of Art & Design Education 9 (1990), 39-55.

[5] Mast, F. W. and Kosslyn, S. M. Visual mental images can be ambiguous: Insights from individual differences in spatial transformation abilities. Cognition 86 (2002), 57-70.

[6] Chambers, D. and Reisberg, D. Can mental images be ambiguous? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11 (1985), 317.

[7] Chambers, D. and Reisberg, D. What an image depicts depends on what an image means. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992), 145-174.

[8] Bilda, Z. et al. To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question. Design Studies 27 (2006), 587-613.

[9] Rodgers, P. et al. Using concept sketches to track design progress. Design Studies 21 (2000), 451-464.

[10] Goel, V. Sketches of thought. MIt Press, 1995.

[11] Fish, J. and Scrivener, S. Amplifying the mind's eye: sketching and visual cognition. Leonardo (1990), 117-126.

[12] Tang, H. et al. Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: a protocol study using the function–behaviour–structure coding scheme. Design Studies 32 (2011), 1-29.

[13] McKim, R. H. Experiences in visual thinking. (1972),

[14] Goldschmidt, G. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity research journal 4 (1991), 123-143.

[15] Purcell, A. and Gero, J. S. Drawings and the design process: A review of protocol studies in design and other disciplines and related research in cognitive psychology. Design Studies 19 (1998), 389-430.

[16] Kavakli, M. and Gero, J. S. Sketching as mental imagery processing. Design Studies 22 (2001), 347-364.

[17] Verstijnen, I. M. et al. Creative discovery in imagery and perception: Combining is relatively easy, restructuring takes a sketch. Acta Psychologica 99 (1998), 177-200.

[18] Atman, C. J. et al. Comparing freshman and senior engineering design processes: an in-depth follow-up study. Design Studies 26 (2005), 325-357.

[19] Schön, D. A. Designing: Rules, types and words. Design Studies 9 (1988), 181-190.

[20] Schon, D. A. and Wiggins, G. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13 (1992), 135-156.

[21] Goldschmidt, G. On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture. Design Studies 15 (1994), 158-174.