International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 10 - Issue 2, February 2021 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Applicative Biogas Plant For Processing Cow Dung In The Small Scale Livestock Farming

[Full Text]



Ramaiyulis, Ulva Mohtar Lutfi, Riva Hendriani, John Nefri



biogas production, biogas composition, green energy, slurry composition.



This study aims to evaluate the performance of the biogas plant to process cow dung in small-scale farms in rural areas. This biogas plant uses a digester from a 3,000-liter polyethylene tank equipped with a concrete inlet and outlet tub. The tank is planted into the ground upside down and connected to the inlet and outlet tub using 4 '' PVC pipes, as well as the gas line to the stove with a plastic hose, while the stove uses a modified LPG stove. The results of the digester performance test showed that the biogas production rate ranged from 96-104 liters/hour so that 1,244 liters of biogas were accumulated in the morning, 576 liters in the afternoon, and 589 liters in the afternoon. The total gas accumulated in the digester provides pressure between 150-220 mmH2O and is enough to push biogas from the digester to the stove. The use of biogas can turn on 2 ignition stoves at once in the morning for 230 minutes, afternoon for 112 minutes, and evening for 116 minutes. Environmental conditions in the digester with a pH of 7.5 and a constant temperature of 25 ºC can support the anaerobic fermentation process in the digester to produce an optimal and constant rate of biogas production. The residual fermentation slurry from the digester produced a total of 183 liters/day and contained 1.76% nitrogen, 0.81% P2O5, and 0.49% K2O. This biogas processing unit is suitable for developing small scale farmers in rural areas to run environmentally friendly livestock businesses.



[1] D. Migas, Konversi Mitan ke Gas, Jakarta: Dirjen Migas, pp. 40-49, 2013.
[2] BPS, Indonesian Balance Energy, Jakarta: BPS-Statistic Indonesia, pp. 27-42, 2018.
[3] A. A. Sulaiman, I. Inounu, S. Torang, and Maidaswar, SIWAB Solusi Cerdas Swasembada Daging Sapi dan Kerbau. Jakarta: Sekjen Kementan RI, 2017.
[4] A. U. Farahdiba, A. Ramdhaniati, and S. S. Soedjono, “Teknologi Dan Manajemen Program Biogas Sebagai Kabupaten Malang,” J. Inov. dan Kewirausahaan, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2014.
[5] M. Garfí, J. Martí-Herrero, A. Garwood, and I. Ferrer, “Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: a review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 60, pp. 599–614, 2016.
[6] Ramaiyulis, Nilawati, E. Yulia, and R. Novia, “Empowering of communities receiving the aid of organic fertilizer processing units (‘UPPO’) with quality and packaging improvement in Indonesia,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2817–2821, Jan. 2020
[7] T. W. Widodo, A. Asari, A. Nurhasanah, and E. Rahmarestia, “Design and Development of Biogas Reactor for Farmer Group Scale,” Indonesian. J. Agric., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–128, 2009.
[8] N. Sawyerr, C. Trois, T. S. Workneh, and O. Oyebode, “Design of a household biogas digester using co-digested cassava, vegetable and fruit waste,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 1476–1482, 2020.
[9] K. Hagos, J. Zong, D. Li, C. Liu, and X. Lu, “Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges, and perspectives,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 76, pp. 1485–1496, 2017.
[10] P. G. Adinurani, H. S. Roy, W. Satriyo, N. Anggi, M. Mel and S. Andi, “The Performance of Jatropha Curcas Linn. Capsule Husk as Feedstocks Biogas in One Phase Anaerobic Digestion,” Procedia Chem., vol. 14, pp. 316–325, 2015.
[11] BSN, Unit penghasil biogas dengan tangki pencerna (digester) tipe kubah tetap dari beton. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional, pp. 16-32, 2012.
[12] E. Kusrini, M. Lukita, M. Gozan, B.H. Susanto, T. W. Widodo, “Characterization and Removal of CO2 Using Modified Clinoptilolite Zeolites in A Fixed-Bed Column,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2019.
[13] H. Clemens, R. Bailis, A. Nyambane, and V. Ndung, “Energy for Sustainable Development Africa Biogas Partnership Program: A review of clean cooking implementation through market development in East Africa,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 46, pp. 23–31, 2018.
[14] A. J. Ward, B. Emiliano, L. Morten, F. Anders, and A. Anders, “Real-time monitoring of a biogas digester with gas chromatography, near-infrared spectroscopy, and membrane-inlet mass spectrometry,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 102, no. 5, pp. 4098–4103, 2011.
[15] S. Im, S. O. Petersen, D. Lee, and D. H. Kim, “Effects of storage temperature on CH4 emissions from cattle manure and subsequent biogas production potential,” Waste Manag., vol. 101, pp. 35–43, 2020.