IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 10 - Issue 2, February 2021 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Practices Of Risk Evaluation In The Construction Industry Within Conflict Zones

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Bahaa Razia

 

KEYWORDS

Conflict zones, Construction industry, Restrictions, Risk management, Risk perception, Thinking process, Policies

 

ABSTRACT

This paper identifies risk factors and how these risks are perceived in the construction industry within conflict zones, where risks are inherently greater and different. This involves identifying risk variables and aspects that affect how stakeholders shape their perceptions and make informed decisions. The research began by examining stakeholders in the construction industry within conflict zones, using the case study of Palestine. A qualitative research was adopted to gain a better understanding of the situation, using two sets of semi-structured stakeholders interviews and a review of policy documentation. The interview findings were transcribed, translated and analysed. A range of risk variables was uncovered, including movement restrictions, limitations in the locations of construction and problems related to particular policies. The findings also confirmed the applicability of different theories and revealed other aspects that affect risk perception, particularly: cultural, social and psychometric, as well as the process of policy implementation and validation. The interviewees considered that inappropriate implementation of policies is the main cause of poor construction development, followed by restrictions in movement and poor land management. This implies that there are problems and a lack of understanding in dealing with risk perception in the construction industry within conflict zones.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Adams, J. (1995). Risk. London: UCL Press.
[2] Adams, F. K. (2006) Eliciting expert beliefs for the Bayesian analysis of contract risks: an investigation. Construct Manage Economy. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), pp. 81–96.
[3] Angen, M. J. (2000) Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10 (3), pp. 378-395.
[4] Baxter, J. & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘‘rigor’’ in interview analysis. Transaction of the Institute of British Geographers, 22 (4), pp. 505 - 525.
[5] Bodemer, N., Ruggeri, A. & Galesic, M. (2013). When dread risks are more dreadful than continuous risks: comparing cumulative population losses over time. PLOS, 8 (6), pp. 544-554.
[6] Brasier, K., Mclaughlin, D.K., Rhubart, D., Stedman, R.C., Filteau, M.R. & Jacquet, J.B. (2013). Risk perceptions of natural gas development in the Marcellus shale. Environmental Practice, 15 (2), pp. 108–122.
[7] Burns, W. J. & Slovic, P. (2012). risk perception and behavior: anticipating and responding. Journal of Risk Analysis, 32 (4), pp. 579 - 582.
[8] Dake, K. (1992). Myths of nature and the public. Journal of Social Issues, 48 (4) pp 21-38.
[9] De Marco, A. & Thaheem, M. J. (2014). Risk analysis in construction projects: A practical selection methodology. American Journal of Applied Science, 11 (1), pp. 74 - 84.
[10] Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
[11] Douglas, M. (1990). Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, 119 (4), pp. 1-16.
[12] Enshassi, A., Mohamed, S. & Abushaban, S. (2009). Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza strip. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15 (3), pp. 269-280.
[13] Findley M., Smith S. Gorski J. & O’Neil M. (2007). Safety climate differences among job positions in a nuclear decommissioning and demolition industry: Employees' self-reported safety attitudes and perceptions. Safety Science, 45 (2), pp. 875-889.
[14] Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9 (2), pp. 127 -152.
[15] Gambatese, J. A., Behm, M. & Rajendran, S. (2008). Designs role in construction accident causality and prevention: Perspectives from an expert panel. Safety Science, 46 (2), pp. 675-691.
[16] Goji, L. T. & Yakubu, I. (2016). Identification and assessment of key risk factors affecting public construction projects in Nigeria: stakeholders’ perspectives. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology Studies, 4, (2), pp. 20-32.
[17] Graubard, S. R. (1990). Preface to the issue “Risk”. Daedalus, 119 (4), pp. 119-132.
[18] Hallowell, M. (2010). Safety risk perception in construction companies in the Pacific Northwest of the USA. Construction Management and Economics, 28 (3), pp. 403-413.
[19] Holmes N., Triggs, T. J., Gifford, S. M. & Dawkins, A. W. (1997). Occupational injury risk in a blue collar, small business industry: Implications for prevention. Safety Science, 25 (1), pp. 67-78.
[20] Jannadi O. A. & Almishari S. (2003). Risk assessment in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129 (2), pp. 492-500.
[21] Jayasudha, K. & Vidivelli, B. (2016). Analysis of major risks in construction projects. ARPN journal of engineering and applied science, 11 (11), pp. 6943-6950.
[22] Joffe, H. (1999). Risk and ‘The other’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Kasperson, R., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. & Ratick, S. (1988). The Social Amplification of Risk A Conceptual Framework. Risk Analysis, 8 (2), pp. 177-187.
[24] Krane, H. P., Rolstadas, A. and Olsson, N. O. E. (2010) Categorizing Risks in Seven Large Projects-Which Risks Do the Projects Focus On?. Project Management Journal, 41 (1), pp. 81 86.
[25] Krass, N.N. and Slovic, P. (1988). Taxonomic analysis of perceived risk: modelling individual and group perceptions within homogeneous hazard domains. Risk Analysis, 8 (3), pp. 435-455.
[26] Leiter, M. P., Zanaletti W. & Argentero P. (2009). Occupational Risk Perception, Safety Training and Injury Prevention: Testing a Model in the Italian Printing Industry. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14 (1), pp. 1-10.
[27] Linda, G. M. & John, M. J. (2011). Sociology. Toronto: Person Canada.
[28] Mahamid, I., Bruland, A. & Dmaidi, N. (2012). Delay cause in road construction projects. ASCE Journal of management in engineering, 28 (3), pp. 300-310.
[29] Marris, C., Langford, I. H., & O'Riordan, T. (1998). A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis, 18 (5), pp. 635-647.
[30] Nieto-Morote, A., & Ruz-Vila, F. (2011). A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (2), pp. 220-231.
[31] Otway, H. J. & Cohen, H. J. (1975) Revealed preference: comments on the Starr benefits-risk relationships. International institution for applies system analysis.
[32] Ouedraogo, A., Groso, A. and Meyer, T. (2011). Risk analysis in research environment - Part I: Modeling lab criticity index using improved risk priority number. Safety Science, 49 (6), pp. 778-784.
[33] Oyewobi, L. O., Ibrahim, A. D. & Ganiyu, B. O. (2012). Evaluating the Impact of Risk on Contractor's Tender Figure in Public Buildings Projects in Northern Nigeria. Journal of Engineering, Project and Production Management, 2 (1), pp. 2-13.
[34] Paek, H. J. Oh, S. H., & Hove, T. (2016). How fear-arousing news messages affect risk perceptions and intention to talk about risk. Health Communication, 31 (9), pp. 1-12.
[35] Pender S. (2001). Managing incomplete knowledge: why risk management is not sufficient. International Journal of Project Management, 19 (2), pp. 79–87.
[36] Perry J. G. (1985). Hayes RW. Risk and its management in construction projects. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 1 (78), pp. 499–521.
[37] Pouliquen, L. Y. (1970). Risk analysis in project appraisal. International bank for reconstruction and development. London: The John Hopkins Press.
[38] Raftery, J. (1999). Risk analysis in Project Management. London: Spoon.

[39] Razia, B., Thurairajah, N. & Larkham, P (2017). Understanding delays in construction in conflict zones. In: International Research Conference, Salford, Manchester, UK.
[40] Razia, B., Thurairajah, N. & Larkham, P (2019). Risk Assessment and Risk Engagement in the Construction Industry Within Conflict Zones. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ARCOM Conference, 2-4 September 2019, Leeds, UK. Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM), pp. 863-872. (In Press).
[41] Ripple, S., (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 5 (2), pp. 147–165.
[42] Rohrmann, B. and Renn, O. (2000). Risk perception Research: An Introduction. In: Renn, O. and Rohrmann, B. eds. Cross-Cultural risk perception: A Survey of Empirical Studies. Australia, Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 11-53.
[43] Schultz, C. S. & Jorgensen, K. (2014). Achieving sustainable construction heal and safety CIB W99 conference. Sweden. Lund University. 2-3 June 2014.
[44] Sjoberg, L. (2002). Are Received Risk Perception Models Alive and Well? Risk Analysis. 22 (4), pp. 665-669.
[45] Slovic, P. (1987). Perceptions of risk. Science, 236 (4799), pp. 280-285.
[46] Slovic, P. (1992). Perception of risk: reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In: S. Krimsk and D. Golding, eds. Social theories of risk. Westport, CT: Prager, pp. 117-152.
[47] Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
[48] Slovic, P and Peters, E (2006) Risk perception and affect. Sage Journals, 15 (6), pp. 322-325.
[49] Smith, N.J (2008). Engineering Project and Management. Oxford: Blackwell.
[50] Starr, C. (1969). Social benefits versus technological risk. Science, 165 (3899), pp. 1232-1238.
[51] Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2012) Research Methods for Business Students. 6th edn. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.
[52] Saunders, L. W., Kleiner, B. M., McCoy, A. P., Mills, T., Cooke, T., Linguard, H., Blismas, N. & Wakefield, R. (2012) .Identifying safety critical decision points in the construction project lifecycle. In: Proceedings of 2012 Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference (ISERC), Orlando.
[53] Thomas, G. and Bone, R. (2002). Innovation at the cutting edge: the experience of 3 major infrastructure projects. CIRIA and Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.
[54] Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
[55] Tylor-Gooby, P. (2008) Sociological approaches to risk: strong in analysis but weak in policy influence in recent UK developments. Journal of Risk Research, 11 (7), pp. 863-876.
[56] Tversky, A. & Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185 (4157), pp. 1124 -1131.
[57] Vidivelli, B., Vidhyasagar, E. & Jayasudh, K. (2017). Risk analysis in bridge construction projects. International Journal of Innovation Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 6 (5), pp. 8271-8284.
[58] Wachinger, G. Renn, O. Begg, C. & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). the risk perception paradox-implications for governance and communication of natural hazard. Risk Analysis, 33 (6), pp. 1049-1065.
[59] Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why? The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 119 (4), pp. 41-60.
[60] Walliman, N. (2006). Social research methods. London: Sage.
[61] Zou, P., Zhang, G. & Wang, J. (2007). Understanding the key Risks in Construction Projects in China, International Journal of Project Management, 25 (1), pp. 601-614.