International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us

IJSTR >> Volume 3- Issue 3, March 2014 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Assessment Of IT Utilization In The Administration Of Higher Education In The Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia: A Case Study Of Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMAMU)

[Full Text]



Dr. Qazi, Raza Ur Rehman



Keywords: IT (Personal Computer used by employees at work), Organizational Culture, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Attitude, Behavior Intention, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), Theory of Planed Behavior” (TP)



Abstract: Purpose of this study was to assess the IT utilization higher education in by employees of the Establishment (Idara) department at the IMAMU. In this study focus was on Personal Computer technology utilization. The study was based on the "Technology Acceptance Model" (TAM), developed by Davis in 1986 [1]. According to Davis, "A key purpose of TAM is to provide a basis for tracing the impact of external factors on internal beliefs, attitudes, and intentions" [1]. In TAM, two fundamental variables, "Perceived Usefulness" and "Perceived Ease of Use" were tested [1]. These two variables determine the usage and acceptance of a system [1]. This study will test all the paths of original TAM, along with new factors (perceived personal utility) incorporated in the extended model developed by Dr. Qazi, Raza Ur Rehman (2007) [2]. Factors like organizational culture, individual factors including level of education and duration of training as external factors were also tested. The study results are based on data collected from the employees of the establishment department (Idara Office) of Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, KSA. Furthermore, in this study data are collected from employees (both male and female) who have used the Personal Computer technology at work for at least one year. The results of this study indicated an overall positive association between all the constructs of the factors being tested except the association between the level of education and the actual computer use at job. Similarly negative association was found between organizational culture and actual use of PC at job. Detailed analysis is presented in the analysis section.



[1]. Davis, F.D., 1986, “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results,” Doctoral Dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA.

[2]. Raza Ur Rehamn Qazi, 2007, “ Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A Consideration of Personal Computer Technology (PCT) Use in Public Organizations of a Developing Country of South Asia, Pakistan

[3]. Davis, Fred D., September 1989, “ Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology” MIS Quarterly, 13 (3), pp. 318-340

[4]. Davis, Fred D.; Bagozzi, Richard P.; Warshaw, Paul R., August, 1989, “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models” Management Science, 35 (8), pp. 982-1003.

[5]. Ajzen, I., 1991, “The Theory of Planned Behavior: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,” Vol. 50, pp.179-211.

[6]. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.

[7]. Alavi, M., June 1984, “An Analysis of the Prototyping Approach to Information Systems Development,” Communication of the ACM. 27(6), pp.556-563.

[8]. Alshibl, G. A., 1990, “A Study of the Impact of Using Automated Information Systems on Middle Managers in Large Industrial Organization”, Doctoral Dissertation, the George Washington University.

[9]. Alshilash, A. Abdullah., 1997, “Study to measure the use and effects of Personal Computer Technology on Organizational Functions”, Doctoral Dissertation, The George Washington University.

[10]. Alter, Steven, 1999, Information Systems, a Management Perspective, 2nd Edition

[11]. Anandarjan, Asokan; Wen, Joseph H., 1999, “Evaluation of Personal Computer Technology Investment” Management Decision; London, 37(4), pp. 329.

[12]. Armonk; Byungtae; Nirup, M. Menon, spring 2002, “Personal Computer Technology value through different normative lenses”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), pp. 99-119.

[13]. Armonk; Chan, Yolande E. Spring 2000, “IT value: The great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures” Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), pp. 225-261.

[14]. Armonk; Sumit Sircar; Joe L Turnbow; Bijoy Bordoloi, spring 2000, “A framework for assessing the relationship between Personal Computer Technology investments and firm performance”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), pp. 69.

[15]. Armonk; Tallon, Paul P., Kraemer, Kenneth L., Vijay Gurbaxani, spring 2000, “Executives’ perception of the business value of Personal Computer Technology: A process oriented approach”, Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), pp. 145.

[16]. Arora, Ashish. Athreye, Suma., 2002, “The Software Industry and India’s Economic Development”, Vol. 14, pp. 253-273.

[17]. Avgerou, Chrisanthi, 1998, “How can IT enable economic growth in developing countries?” Personal Computer Technology for Development, 8(1), pp.15

[18]. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W., May 1983, “Development of a Tool for measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction,” Management Science 29(5), pp. 530-545.

[19]. Bailey, James E; Pearson, Sammy W., May 1983 “Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction”, Management Science, 29(5), pp. 530-545

[20]. Talero, E and Gaudette, P., 1995, “Harnesing information for Development” A proposal for a World Bank group strategy”, Discussion Paper No.313, The World Bank.

[21]. Dewan, Sanjeev and Kraemer, Kenneth L, 1998, “International Dimensions of the productivity paradox.” Communiocation of the ACM, 41(8), pp. 56-62.

[22]. Pohjola, Matti, 2001, “Information Technology and economic growth: a cross country analysis,” In Pohjola, Matti (ed)., Information Technology and Economic Development, Oxford University Press, pp. 242-256.

[23]. Heeks, R., 1998a, “Information technology and public sector corruption”, Working Paper, ISPS, IDPM, 4, University of Manchester.

[24]. Kraemer, Kenneth L. and Dedrick, J., 1996, “Computing and Public Organizations”, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Irvine.

[25]. Cebi, Ferhan., Zozlu, Sitki., 2000, “The Strategic Effects of Information Technology on Organizational Performance in a Developing Environment: The Case of Turkey” Journal of Transnational Management Development, Vol 54, pp. 83

[26]. http://opencourseware.kfupm.edu.sa/colleges/cim/acctmis/mis345/files%5C5-Handouts_KSA-to-information-society.pdf

[27]. http://www.citc.gov.sa/English/AboutUs/AreasOfwork/Pages/NCIS.aspx

[28]. http://www.citc.gov.sa/English/Reportsandstudies/Studies/Pages/TheStateofICTMarketDevelopmentinSaudiArabia.aspx

[29]. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2012_eag-2012-en

[30]. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/higher-education/reform-and-innovation/world-conference-on-higher-education/