Policy Implementation Of Special Autonomy Funds: Case Study Of Education Funding In The District Manokwari West Papua, Indonesia
Baesara Wael, Samson Laurens
Keywords: Policy Implementation, Autonomy, Education
ABSTRACT: Regulations special autonomy Papua is a product policy given by the central government in an effort to promote development in various aspects of the four main program priorities for the economy, education, health and infrastructure. in the context of policy implementation, then this can be considered as one of the factors that interfere with activities especially in relation to the legal rules of the program is not yet clear. the focus of this study is: how can the implementation of special autonomy fund policies in education in Manokwari, West Papua province?. This study used a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. This study seeks to identify and analyze on the implementation of policy autonomy special funds Education in Manokwari, West Papua Province through qualitative interpretation. This study seeks to reveal how the implementation of the Special Autonomy Fund for Education in Manokwari, West Papua Province. The research concludes that the Communication External and Internal communication is not maximized. The quality of human resources is still minimal, and not understand the working procedures due to no regulation or supported by PERDASI / PERDASUS governing socialisation Education and lack of special autonomy or special autonomy funds, in terms of the form of facilities or equipment Resource inadequate facilities. In terms of the funds Resources regarding the distribution of the Special Autonomy Fund of uneven and has not touched most of the basic needs of the people of Papua, especially Papuan society itself, as well as in terms of the Resource Authority regarding the delegation of authority from supervisor to subordinate unclear because there is no standard operating Procedure (SOP). Furthermore, in terms of structure in an organizational bureaucracy that there should be a very clear organization structure to facilitate the delegation of authority and accountability.
 BPS Papua Barat, 2011. Indeks Pembangunan Manusia Provinsi Papua Barat Tahun 2011
 BPS Kabupaten Manokwari, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 & 2013, Kabupaten Manokwari Dalam Angka, Kerjasama Bappeda Kabupaten Manokwari dan BPS Kabupaten Manokwari.
 Budi Winarno,2007, Kebijakan Publik Teori dan Proses, Edisi Revisi, Media Presindo (Anggota IKAPI), Jokjakarta.
 Chandler, Ralph C., dan Plano, Jack C. (1988). The Public Administration Dictionary, John Wiley & Sons.
 Edwards, George C., III dan Sharkansky, Ira. (1987). The Policy Predicament, San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
 Edwards III, George C. 1980. Implementing Public Policy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
 Grindle, Merilee S., (ed), 1980, Politics and Apolicy Implementation in the. Third World, new jersey.
 Hakim, 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
 Islamy, M. Irfan, 2000, Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijakan Negara, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
 Mazmanian, Daniel H., dan Paul A. Sabatier, 1983, Implementation and Public Policy, New York: HarperCollins.
 Moleong, Lexi J. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
 Mustopadidjaya 2002, Manajemen Proses Kebijakan Publik, Formulasi,. Implementasi dan Evaluasi Kinerja, Jakarta:LAN.
 Randall B Ripley and Grace A Franklin,1982, Bureucracy and Polity Implementation, Homewood, Illiois the Dorsey Press
 Udoji, 1981, Chief j.o. the African Public Servant as a Public Policy Maker, Public Policy in Africa, Africa Association For PA and Management, Aodis Abeba