IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 3, March 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Architects And Energy Simulations Tool

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Iman Paryudi

 

KEYWORDS

Index Terms: Energy Efficient Building, Energy Simulation Tool, Architect.

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Today, there are many energy simulation tools in the market. However, existing energy simulation tools are not architect friendly. There are at least three shortcomings of the existing energy simulation tools that impede architects from using them: excessive data input requirement, non intuitive user interface, and too complex. An energy simulation tool will be used regularly by architects if it accommodates their preferences such as: simple, easy to use, provide alternative designs, no excessive data input, accuracy is not important. This paper presents the results of literature study on relationship between architects and energy simulation tools.

 

REFERENCES

[1] S. M. Wagner, P. C. N. Mellblom, The Next Generation of Energy Efficient Building Design: Where We Are and Where Should We be Going? Available at: http://best1.thebestconference.org/pdfs/016.pdf, 2008.

[2] Mechanical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Case Studies 2 – Low Energy Building Design Today. Available at: http://me-server.mecheng.strath.ac.uk/group2003/groupk/PDF/Case%20studies2.pdf, 2003.

[3] A. M. Kazim, Assessments of primary energy consumption and its environmental consequences in the United Arab Emirates. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11 (2007) 426-446.

[4] DOE, U. S., Building Energy Software Tools Directory [online]. Available from: http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/ [Accessed 1 March 2011].

[5] S. Bambardekar, U. Poerschke, The Architect as Performer of Energy Simulation in the Early Design State, Eleventh International IBPSA Conference (2009) 1306 – 1313.

[6] S. Attia, J. L. M. Hensen, L. Beltrán, A. De Herdea, Selection Criteria for Building Performance Simulation Tools: Contrasting Architects and Engineers Needs, Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 2011.

[7] R. Paradis, Energy Analysis Tools, Available at: http://www.wbdg.org/resources/energyanalysis.php, 2010.

[8] K. P. Lam, Y. C. Huang, C. Zhai, “Energy Modeling Tools Assessment for Early Design Phase,” Final Report, Center for Building Performance and Diagnostics School of Architecture, Carnegie Melon University, 2004.

[9] A. Schlueter, F. Thesseling, Building Information Model-based Energy Performance Assessment in Early Design Stages. Automation in Construction, 18(2) (2008), 153 – 163.

[10] C. S. Aun, Designing Low Energy Buildings using Energy 10, CPD Seminar, 2004.

[11] N. Bowman, K. Lomas, Does Dynamic Simulation Work? Building Services The CIBSE Journal, March 1986, 30 – 31.

[12] K. P. Lam, N. H. Wong, F. A. Henry, “Study of the Use of Performance-based Simulations Tools for Building Design and Evaluation in Singapore,” Proc. Sixth International IBPSA Conference, 1999.

[13] A. Mahdavi, “Computational decision a support and the building delivery process: necessary dialogue,” Automation in Construction, Vol. 7, pp. 205 – 211, 1998.

[14] A. Mahdavi. V. Hartkopf, V. Loftness, K. P. Lam, “Simulation-based Performance Evaluation as a Design Decision Support Strategy: Experiences with the Intelligent Workspace,” Building Simulation, Australia, pp. 185 – 191, 1993.

[15] C. Morbitzer, P. Strachan, J. Webster, B. Spires, D. Cafferty, ”Integration of Building Simulation into the Design Process of an Architecture Practice,” Proc. Seventh International IBPSA Conference, pp. 697 - 704, 2001.

[16] T. Maile, M. Fischer, and V. Bazjanac, Building Energy Performance Simulation Tools – a Life-Cycle and Interoperable Perspective. CIFE Working Paper #WP107, Stanford University, December 2007.

[17] S. Attia, State of the Art of Existing Early Design Simulation Tools for Net Zero Energy Buildings: A Comparison of Ten Tools, Available at: http://www-climat.arch.ucl.ac.be/s_attia/attia_nzeb_tools_report.pdf, 2011.

[18] T. Hong, J. Zhang, Y. Jiang, IISABRE: An Integrated Building Simulation Environment Building & Environment, 32(3) (1997) 219-224.

[19] S. Attia, L. Beltrán, A. De Herdea, J. Hensen, “Architect Friendly: A Comparison of Ten Different Building Performance Simulation Tools,” Proc. Eleventh International IBPSA Conference, pp. 204 – 2011, 2009.

[20] A. Mahdavi, S. Feurer, A. Redlein, G. Suter, Inquiry into the Building Performance Simulation Tools Usage by Architects in Austria. Eight International IBPSA Conference, 2003, 777 – 784.

[21] M. Donn, Tools for quality control in simulation. Building and Environment, 36, 673 – 680.

[22] A. Yezioro, A knowledge based CAAD system for passive solar panel architecture. Renewable Energy, 34, 769 – 779.