IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 6 - Issue 1, January 2017 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Systematic Review On Massive Open Online Courses Based On Primary/Meta-Analysis

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Ahmed Ibrahim Safana, Muesser C. Nat

 

KEYWORDS

MOOCs, cMOOCs, xMOOCs, Massively Open Online Courses, Massive Open Online Courses, MOOCs in Africa, Higher Education, MOOCs in Higher Education, Meta – Analysis, Systematic Review

 

ABSTRACT

The research conducted a systematic review on peer reviewed literature of Massive Open Online courses that encapsulated the finding of more than 40 articles, by employing the procedure of meta-analysis and primary-analysis in the bid of addressing the research question, is MOOCs a way out to African Institutions? An open code context method was applied to validate the articles for the sake of comparisons. The validation result shows a certain level of overlapping based on the Open Code Context procedure on the reviewed literature researched, which led to meta-analysis that minimized the overlap. The primary data collected have been analyzed using the primary-analysis procedure. Even though, the size of the random effect means was as minimum as 0.23, hence, a significant difference from zero statistically. A heterogeneous distribution of fixed effect model was applied to the primary- analysis and the mean effect size was 0.21 and 0.22 using the random effect model. The result, the gaps, the implication and the prospect future of the research was particularized and discussed.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Oscar L., (2015) A Factorization Approach to Evaluate Open Response Assignment in MOOCs using Preference learning on Peer Assessment. Knowledge Based System P. 322 -328.

[2] Mingming Z., (2016) Chinese Universities’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspectives. Computer and Education P. 194 – 203

[3] Nina H., Allison L., &Colin M., (2015) Context Counts: how learners influence learning in a MOOCs. Computer and Education P. 83 - 91

[4] Milligan, C., Margaryan, A., & Littlejohn, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in massive open online courses. Journal of Online Learning with Technology (Special Issue on MOOCs) – Under Review.

[5] Oyo, B., & Williams, D. (2014). Towards universal higher education in Uganda using MOOCs. Paper presented at the 9th International eLearning Africa Conference, May 28-30 2014, Kampala, Uganda.

[6] Pedro J. et al., (2015) Precise Effectiveness Strategy for analyzing the effectiveness of students with Educational Resources and Activities in MOOCs. Computer in Human Behavior P. 108 - 118

[7] Ahmed M., et al., (2014) What Drive a Successful MOOCs: An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOC. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies

[8] Aebischer, P. and G. Escher (2013) ‘Can the IT revolution lead to a rebirth of world-class European universities?’ in Weber, L. E. and J. J. Duderstadt (eds.) Preparing Universities for an Era of Change, Glion Colloquium Series No. 8 (London: Economica).

[9] Bacon, J. (2013) ‘MOOCs: Hyped, Humbled, Hardy’, Bacon’s Rebellion, 11 December, http://www.baconsrebellion.com/2013/12/moocs-hyped-humbled-hardy.html (accessed on 5 February 2014).

[10] Boga, S., & McGreal, R. (2014). Introducing MOOCs to Africa: New economy skills for Africa Program – ICT. Commonwealth of Learning, Canada.

[11] Christensen, G., A. Steinmetz, B. Alcorn, A. Bennett, D. Woods and E. J. Emanuel (2013) the MOOC Phenomenon: Who Takes Massive Open Online Courses and Why? (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network),

[12] Escher, Gérard, Dimitrios Noukakis, and Patrick Aebischer (2014) "Boosting Higher Education in Africa through Shared Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)" in Education, Learning, Training : Critical Issues for Development, International Development Policy series No.5, Geneva: Graduate Institute Publications, Boston: Brill-Nijhoff, pp. 195–214

[13] Tharindu, R., L., Andrew, A., A., & Shirley, A., (2013). MOOCs: A Systematic Study of Published Literature. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.

[14] Parag C., Asoke N., (2014) MOOCs in Education: A Case Study in India Context and Vision to Ubiquitous Learning. IEEE InternationalConference on MOOC, Innovationand Technologyin Education (MITE)

[15] Rana et al (2011). What a forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and validation Review of Educational Research

[16] Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=Special&sp=init2&article=516

[17] Schrire, S., & Levy, D. (2012). Troubleshooting MOOCs: The case of a massive open online course at a college of education. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2012(1), 761-766.

[18] Sadigh, D., Seshia, S. A., & Gupta, M. (2012). Automating exercise generation: A step towards meeting the MOOC challenge for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Embedded Systems Education (WESE). Retrieved from http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dsadigh/WESE12.pdf

[19] Radu V., Diana A., (2014) OER and MOOCs – The Romanian Experience. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies

[20] Mehmet K., Hakam A., (2015) A Theoretical Analysis of MOOCs type from a Perspective of Learners. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Science P.15 – 19

[21] Prashast et al., (2014) MOOC: the Paradigm-Shift in Indian Education. IEEE InternationalConference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE )
[22] Allison L et al., (2016) Learning in MOOCs: Motivation & Self-Regulated Learning in MOOCs. Internet and Higher Education.

[23] Anant V., Pooja C., (2014) Ramifications of MOOCs for Increasing User Engagement. IEEE InternationalConference on MOOC, Innovationand Technologyin Education (MITE)

[24] Brabham, D.C. (2013) Higher Education and Economic Development in Africa (Washington, D.C.: World Bank). Crowdsourcing (Cambridge: The MIT Press).

[25] Catalina U. & Anca N., (2015) MOOCs in our Universities: Hope and Worries The 6th International Conference Edu World 2014 “Education Facing Contemporary World Issues”, 7th - 9th November 2014

[26] Doraisamy G., Deepak G (2015) Impact of Learning Motivation on MOOCs Performance: Transfer Vs. Made MOOCs. IEEE/ACIS ICIS 2014.

[27] Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 130-160.

[28] Jun X., et al., (2014) The Usability Research of Learning Resources Designing. International Conference of Teaching, Assessment and Learning (TALE)

[29] Khe and Wing(2014) Student and instructors use of MOOC: motive and challenges: Educational Research Review P. 45 - 58

[30] Lane, A. (2013) ‘The Potential of MOOCs to Widen Access to, and Success in, Higher Education Study’, The Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference 2013 (Paris: EADTU), pp. 189–203.

[31] Khaled M., Hang F., & Andrew P., (2015) Understanding the MOOCs continuous: the role of Openness & repetition. Computer and Education P. 28-38

[32] Liyanagunawardena, T., S. Williams and A. Adams (2013) ‘The Impact and Reach of MOOCs: A Developing Countries’ Perspective’, Elearning Papers (33), pp. 1–8, http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/32452/1/In-depth_33_1.pdf (accessed on 1 February 2014).

[33] Layla Z., Sebastian R., & Jerry D., (2015) Semantically Enriched Massive Open-Online Courses (MOOCs) Platform. Computer in Human Behavior P. %76 - 593

[34] Anderson, T., & McGreal, R. (2012). Disruptive pedagogies and technologies in universities. Education, Technology and Society, 15(4), 380-389. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/15_4/32.pdf.

[35] Anoush M., Manuela B. & Allison L., (2015) Instructional Quality of MOOCs Computer and Education P. 77 – 83

[36] Antonia B., et al., (2015) Comparing MOOCs In M-Learning and e-Learning settings. International Conference of Teaching, Assessment and Learning (TALE)

[37] Benedict, O., & Billy, M., K. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses for African by African. Scaling up learning for sustained impact. Springer.

[38] Harvard Magazine (2013) ‘What Modularity Means for MOOCs’, Havard Magazine, 12 May, http://harvardmagazine.com/2013/12/harvard-mit-online-education-views-changing (accessed on 10 February 2014).

[39] Bonino, R (2012). International student mobility: Status, trends and possible impact of e-learning and social media, media applications for business, learning and society. VCOBAM Conference Proceedings, 3(1), 81-91

[40] Eke, H. N. (2010) the perspective of e-learning and libraries in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. Library Review, 59(4), 274–290.

[41] Economides, T. (2013, October). The state of the art in educational technology. Paper presented at the IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, October 20-23, California, and USA.

[42] Gaebel, M. (2014). An update of European University Association’s first paper on MOOCs. EUA Occasional Papers. Retrieved from http://www.eua.be/Libraries/Publication/MOOCs_Update_January_2015.sflb.ashx

[43] Laurillard, D. (2014) ‘Five Myths about MOOCs’, Times Higher Education, 16 January, http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/comment/opinion/five-myths-about-moocs/2010480.article (accessed on 31 January 2014).

[44] Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-moocs (massive open online courses). Open Praxis, 5(1).

[45] Wenal S., (2014) MOOCs, MOOE, and MOOR in China. IEEE/ACIS ICIS 2014.

[46] Willi B et al., (2013) The MOOCs Business Model. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Science P. 2931 - 2957

[47] Elena et al.,(2014) Language MOOCs System p 149- 155

[48] Fatiha B., Henda C., (2015) MOOC Rec: A case Based Recommender System for MOOC. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Science P.1813 – 1822

[49] Kelly, R. (2014) ‘Inside the First Year Data from MITx and HarvardX’, Campus Technology, 27 January, http://campustechnology.com/articles/2014/01/27/inside-the-first-year-data-from-mitx-and-harvardx.aspx (accessed on 12 February 2014).