IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 3, March 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Acreage Response Under Price Policy Program On Corn Production

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Edison, Ira Wahyuni

 

KEYWORDS

acreage, response, corn, government programs, subsidy, and price policy program

 

ABSTRACT

The aim of research was to learn deeply acreage response using price policy program on agricultural corn production. Because of condition of corn in good position in moment of research, it was caused from government policy implementation on crop production such as input subsidy and support programs. The indicator of successfulness of those programs is influenced by the role of those programs in implementation. One of results of government policy effect was from implementation of support price program which produced better impact in acreage program. Its effect was very crucial in exploring this study, this is caused by high priority government to imply this policy program. In order to learn this phenomena, some approaches was used such as market and risk factors. Using assumption that the movement of policy implementation in the future, it is hoped that it can find the alternative best policy program. Using quantitative method, this mobility program can be analyzed considering some restriction. Research found that in condition of expected market price better than support price, it just used support price program in specific condition. Furthermore, truncation program effect was much better when support price was better than expected market price in making acreage decision.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Edison, The Responsiveness of Rice Area to Price and Production Cost in Jambi. International Journal of Agricultural System. Vol 2 no. 2 pp. 133-139. 2014.
[2] Edison and R. Siata, The Analysis of Soybean Production Supply Response in Tebo District, Jambi. Proceeding National Seminar BKS-PTN in Babel University. Bangka. Pp. 46 – 53. 2017.
[3] Edison, The Responsiveness of Jambi Rice Acreage to Price and Production Costs. Proceeding International Seminar CRISU-CUPT 2011 in University of Sriwijaya. Palembang. Pp. 24 – 31, 2011.
[4] S.L. Bapna, H.P. Binswanger, and J.B. Quizon, Systems of Output Supply and Factor Demand for Semiarid Tropical India. Economic Growth Centre, Yale University USA. Pp. 179 – 202, 1991.
[5] C.C. David, and I. Barker, Modern Rice Varieties and Fertilizer Consumption in IRRI Economic Consequences of New Rice Technology. Philippines. Pp. 175-212. 1988.
[6] H. Guyomard, M. Baudry, and A. Carpenter, Estimating Crop Supply Response in the Presence of Farm Program: Application on the CAP. European Review of Agricultural Economics Vol. 23 no. 1 pp. 401-420. 1996.
[7] L.B.K. Mose, and A. Kuvyenhoven, Aggregate Supply Response to Price Incentives: The Case of Smallholder Maize Production in Kenya. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings. Vol. 8 no. 2 pp. 1271-1275. 2007.
[8] A. Tripath, and A.R. Prasad, Estimation of Agricultural Supply Response of Co-integration Approach. Crauch Institute of Development Research. India. Pp. 106 – 131, 2017.
[9] R. Keeney, and T.W. Hertel, Yield Response to Prices: Implications for Policy Modelling. Working Paper Dept. of Agricultural Economics. Purdue University. Pp. 1 – 36, 2008.
[10] A. Carpentier, A. Gohin, P. Schokai, and A. Thomas. Economic Modelling of Agricultural Production: Past Advances and New Challenges. Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies. Vol. 96 no. 1 pp. 131-165. 2015.
[11] J.S. Clark, and J. Spriggs, Policy Implications of Unit Root Non-stationarity in Multiproduct Acreage Response Systems, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Pp. 1 – 27, 1989.
[12] R. Oktaviani, and R.W. Asmarantaka, The Rise in International Food Prices: The Impact on and Policy Implication for Indonesian Food Security. Department Economics and Agribusiness. IPB Bogor. Pp 1 – 14, 2010.
[13] T. Colin, and R. Townsend, Dynamic Supply Response Estimation. Annual Conference of AARES. Melbourne. Australia. Pp. 35 – 42, 2011.
[14] B. Yu, F. Liu, and L. You, Dynamic Agricultural Supply Response Under Economic Transformation. IFPRI Discussion Paper. Washington, D.C. USA. Pp. 1 – 21, 2010.
[15] W.W. Cochrane, Conceptualizing the Supply Relation in Agriculture. Journal of Economics. Vol. 37 no. 5 pp. 1161-1175. 1995.
[16] W.T. Mc Sweeny, D.E. Kenyon, and R.A. Kramer, Toward an Appropriate Measure of Uncertainty in a Risk Programming Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 61 no. 1 pp. 87-96. 1987.
[17] B.K. Goodwin, A.F. Ramsey, and J. Chvosta, Applied Econometrics with SAS: Modelling Demand, Supply and Risk. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. USA. Pp. 1 – 74, 2018.
[18] J. Meyer, Expected Utility as Paradigm for Decision Making in Agriculture. A Comprehensive Assessment of the Role of Risk in US Agriculture. Springer Science Business Media New York. Pp. 1 – 18, 2002.
[19] Anonymous. Annual Reports of Jambi Province. Central Bureau of Statistics and Regional Bureau of Planning. Jambi Province. Pp. 1 – 278, 2019.
[20] D.N. Gujarati, and D.C. Porter, Basic Econometrics. International Edition (5th edition) McGraw-Hill New York. Pp. 1 – 900, 2009.
[21] D.N. Gujarati, and D.C. Porter, “Basic Econometrics,” International Edition (5th edition) McGraw-Hill New York, pp. 1 – 900, 2009.
[22] P. M. Savadatti, Supply Response of Pigeonpea in India, Cointegration and Vector Error Correction Analysis, International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences (IJRESS), vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 381-392 2018.
[23] G. Mustafa, I.A. Latif and H. Egwuma. An Empirical Analysis of Supply Response of Rubber in Malaysia. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, vol. 12 no. 4, pp. 148-156 2016.