The Realities Of Maintenance And Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) Allocation In Basic Education System: Unheard Voices Of Public School Teachers
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Normi Roxan C. Ochada, Dr. Gloria P. Gempes
KEYWORDS
basic education, education, maintenance and other operating expenses, public school teachers, Philippines
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this phenomenological study was to describe the lived experiences, coping mechanisms and insights of 17 teachers regarding the MOOE allocation in basic education system. The data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus group discussion which were subjected to thematic analysis. The result revealed the proper implementation/utilization of MOOE fund by the principal. However, concerns on teacher’s trust on the MOOE transparency and non-involvement of teachers in financial planning were also observed and experienced. Coping mechanisms of the participants included openness and acceptance, indifference, and resourcefulness and creativity. The participants’ insights based on their experiences were: MOOE is fund provision for schools’ maintenance and operation, teachers to be centrally involved in the MOOE allocation, and there are varied sentiments on the integrity of MOOE spending. The study implies that creating an environment of trust in the school may result to satisfactory performance of teachers and students. Furthermore, transparency and openness of the School Head may encourage teacher’s participation and commitment to school improvement.
REFERENCES
[1]. Abolalayee, B. (2015). How to have motivated and love working employees. Tehran: Industrial Management Organization
[2]. Al-Samarrai, S. (2016).Assessing basic education service delivery in the Philippines: Public education expenditure tracking and quantitative service delivery study. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
[3]. Anderson, J. A. (2005). Accountability in education. Education policy series 1. Stedi Media: UNESCO.
[4]. Argon, T. (2015). Teacher and administrator views on school principals’ accountability. Educational Series: Theory and Practice 15, (4), 925-944.
[5]. Barasa, J.M.N. (2009) Educational Organization and Management, Nairobi: Jomo Kenyatta Foundation.
[6]. Bergman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, M., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change: Factors affecting implementation and continuation, (7). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
[7]. Bisschoff, T. (1997). Financial management explained. Pretoria: Kagiso Tertiary.
[8]. Bisschoff T., & Mestry R. (2003). Financial School management explained (2nd ed.). Cape Town: Pearsons Publishing.
[9]. Brodaty, H., Burns, K., Jayasinha, R., & Tsang, R. (2012). Behavior management: a guide to good practice: Managing behavioral and psychological symptoms of Dementia. Commonwealth: Canberra.
[10]. Brouwers, A.,.& Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education,16, 239–253.
[11]. Bush, T. (2004). Theories of educational leadership and management. London: Sage Publications.
[12]. Bush,, T., Bisschoff, T., Glover, D., Heystek, J., Joubert, R., & Moloi, K. (2006). School leadership, management and governance in South Africa: A systematic literature review. Research Series. Johannesburg: Gauteng Department of Education.
[13]. Coetzee, M., Schreuder, D., & Tiadinyane, R. (2007). Organizational commitment and its relation to career anchors. Southern African Business Review, 11 (1), 65-86.
[14]. Cooley, V. E., & Shen, C. (2003). School accountability and professional job responsibilities: A perspective from secondary principals. NASSP (National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin), 87(634), 9-25.
[15]. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed Methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[16]. Cunningham, R. (2008). An examination of the relationship between servant leadership behavior of the elementary school principal; school climate and student achievement as measured by the 4th grade mathematics and reading Michigan educational association program. (Master’s Theses and Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://commons.emich.edu/theses/139
[17]. David, J. (1996). The who, what, and why of site-based management. Educational Leadership, 53 (4), 4-9.
[18]. Delaney, J.G. (1995). The relationship between school-based management and school improvement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from www.mun.ca/educ/faculty/mwatch/win96/delaney
[19]. DepEd Order No. 13,s 2016- Implementing Guidelines on the Direct Release and Use of Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) Allocations of Schools, Including Other Funds Managed by Schools. Retrieved from www.deped.gov.ph
[20]. Dieltiens, V. (2005). Transformation of the South African schooling system: The fault-lines in South African school governace: policy or people? Braamfontein: CEPD.
[21]. Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2007). Peer effects, pupil-teacher ratios, and teacher incentives: Evidences from a randomization evaluation in Kenya (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://www.stanford.edu/pdupas/Tracking_rev.pdf
[22]. Education Act of 1982- Batas Pambansa BLG.232) Retrieved from www.chanrobles.com/bataspambansabilang232.htm
[23]. Eslami, A. (2008). Institutional indifference: Strategy of grounded Theory (Master thesis). Retrieved from scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-9739/2016/2217-97391602022A.pdf
[24]. Fasih, T. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools the theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
[25]. Gempes, G.P. (2014). Self-development beliefs and values of the workforce as constructs in the attainment of the firms’ learning organization status. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 70,121.
[26]. Griesel, I. (2011). The teaching of financial management principles to school leaders in disadvantaged schools (PhD Thesis). Retrieved from ulspace.ul.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10386/1687/ngobeni_sn_2015.pdf
[27]. Gunnarsson, V., Orazem, P., Sanchez, M., & Verdisco, A. (2004). Does school decentralization raise student outcomes? theory and evidence on the roles of school autonomy and community participation (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=126 & context=econ_las
[28]. Hallak, J. & Poisson M. (2007). Ethics and corruption in education. Paris: IEP-UNESCO.
[29]. Hawkins, P. and Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions. An individual, group and organizational approach. Milton Keynes- Philadelphia: Open University Press.
[30]. Herman, J.J. (1991). School-based management: A checklist of things to consider. NASSP Bulletin, 74 (527), 67-71.
[31]. Heyneman, S., Anderson, K., & Nuraliyeva, N. (2008). The cost of corruption in higher education. Comparative Education Review, 52 (1).
[32]. Ho, D. C. W. (2010). Teacher participation in curriculum and pedagogical decisions: Insights into curriculum leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35 (5), 613-624.
[33]. Jimenez, E., & Yasuyuki S. (1999). Do community-managed schools work? an evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO Program. World Bank Economic Review 13 (3), 415–41.
[34]. Karim, S., Claudia A., Santizo, R., & Mendoza, E. (2004). Transparency in education. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning and International Academy of Education.
[35]. King, E., & Berk, Ö. (1998). What is decentralization got to do with learning? The case of Nicaragua’s school autonomy reform (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from https://www.reserahgate.net
[36]. Knight (1993). Financial management for schools: The thinking manager’s guide. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.
[37]. Kogan M. (1986). Education accountability: An analytic overview. London: Hutchinson.
[38]. Kotele A. (2001). A study of what can be done to assist principals in Lesotho secondary and high schools to carry out their jobs more effectively (M.Ed. Dissertation). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/210a/1df5aOb6e2b9ab78ec40ed70b16f56e47ed1.pdf
[39]. Lehohla, A.L. (2003). Ethics and corruption in education: the case of Lesotho. Guanajuato, Mexico: International Institute for Education Planning.
[40]. Lekhetho M. (2003). Impact of education management systems on the effectiveness of secondary schools in Lesotho. Dalbridge: University of South Africa.
[41]. Manasan, R., Centino, A., & Cuenca, J. (2011). Mobilizing LGU support for basic education: Focus on the special education fund. Discussion Paper Series (No. 2011-07)..
[42]. Mbatsane, P. N. (2006). The financial accountability of school governing bodies. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
[43]. Mestry, R. (2006). The functions of schools governing bodies in managing school finances. South African Journal of Education, 26 (1), 27–38.
[44]. Mohrman, S.A., & Wohlstetter, P. (1994). School-based management: Organizing for high performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
[45]. Motsamai, M.J. (2009).The evaluation of the implementation of the manual for principals of high schools regarding to financial management in the Mafeteng District of Lesotho (M.Ed. Script). Unpublished. Bloemfontein: University of the Free State.
[46]. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[47]. Niemann, G. (2002). School business management: Pc van der Westhuizen (Ed.) Effective Educational Management, 371– 403.
[48]. Ntsala M. (2001). The extent to which the principals of mafeteng secondary and high schools carry out supervision at their schools (M.Ed. Dissertation). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/210a/1df5a0b6e2b9ab78ec40ed70b16f56e47edd1.pdf
[49]. Ogrodzinska, T. (2001). Study on the impact of corruption on education in Poland (unpublished). Retrieved from https://socialsciencereserach.org/index.php/GJHSS/article/download/1834/177
[50]. Olmedo, A.H., & Gempes, G.P. (2016). Shadow but unruffled of psychologically distressed public secondary school teachers. International Journal of Management Excellence 7, no. 2 (2016); 762-795.
[51]. Osorio, F. B. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools the theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
[52]. Palicarsky, C. (2006). Anti-corruption training in Bulgaria. Paper prepared as part of the IIEP’s project on ‘Ethics and corruption in education. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO.
[53]. Parker P., & Martin A. (2009). Coping and buoyancy in the workplace: Understanding their effects on teachers’ work-related well-being and engagement. Teach Educ., 25 (1):68–75.
[54]. Patrinos, A., & Kagia, R., (2007). Maximizing the performance of education systems: The case of teacher absenteeism. In the Many Faces of Corruption-Tracking Vulnerabilities at the Sector Level, (pp. 63-88).Washington, DC: World Bank.
[55]. Patrinos, H. A., & Santibáñez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in school-based management. Washington, DC: World Bank.
[56]. Potgieter, J., Visser, P.J., van der Bank, J., Mothata, M., & Squelch, J. (1997). Understanding the SA Schools Act: what the public needs to know. Pretoria: Government Printer.
[57]. Republic Act 9485 (Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007) Retrieved from action@deped.gov.ph
[58]. Rowan B., Camburn E., & Barnes, C. (2004). Benefiting from comprehensive school reform: A review of research on CSR implementation in C. Cross (Ed.), Putting the pieces together: lessons from comprehensive school reform research (pp. 1-52). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform.
[59]. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[60]. Runhaar, P., Sanders, K., & Yang, H.(2010). Stimulating teachers’ reflection and feedback asking: an interplay of self-efficacy, learning goal orientation, and transformational leadership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (5), 1154-1161.
[61]. Sargeant J., McNaughton E., Mercer S., Murphy D., Sullivan, P., & Bruce, D. (2011). Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Medical teacher, 33 (9), 744-749.
[62]. Somech, A. (2010). Participative decision making in schools: A mediating-moderating analytical framework for understanding school and teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46 (2), 174-209.
[63]. Transparency International. (2005). Stealing the future: Corruption in the classroom. Berlin, Germany: Transparency International. Retrieved on September 20, 2016 from http://www.transparency.Org/publications.
[64]. Tsang, W.K. (1994). Development, education and the state in Hong Kong: A research agenda for comparative study. Educational Journal, 21 (2) & 22 (1), 5-27.
[65]. Tulo, A.H., & Gempes, G.P. (2016). The mediating effect of training perspective in the relationship between competency potential and career progression of technical vocational trainers. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 70,121.
[66]. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2006). Teachers and educational quality: Monitoring global needs for 2015, Montreal, Quebec: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
[67]. Wango, G., Musomi, M., & Akinyi, C. (2012). Gender and education in Kenya and realignment of education to the constitution. Nairobi: ITP Human Rights Towards Gender Equality Seminar.
[68]. Waters, Janet (2016). Phenomenological research guidelines. Capilano University 2055 Purcell Way, North Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V7J 3H5 Tel: 604.986.1911
[69]. World Bank Group & Australian Aid. (2016). Increasing investment to improve basic education outcomes in the Philippines. Philippines Education Note (No. 1).
|