IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 4, April 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Evaluation Of 3 In 1 Training Program (Training, Certification, Work Placement) At Padang Industrial Training Center

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Dina Nurvita Sari, Ambiyar, Fahmi Rizal

 

KEYWORDS

Evaluation Program, Kirkpatrick Model, 3 In 1 Training Program

 

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the reaction of participant satisfaction, the learning process, behavior changes, and the results of the 3 in 1 Training Program (Training, Certification, Work Placement) at Padang Industrial Training Center. This research was an evaluation study with the Kirkpatrick evaluation model (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, Result). The method used was a mixed method by sequential explanatory. Quantitative data have been obtained by questionnaire to 104 training participants and analyzed by descriptive analysis using Achievement Level Respondents. Qualitative data have been collected by interviewed to 4 informants and observed, and analyzed with data reduction, data display, and make decisions/verification. The final stage of the findings of the study was The Evaluation of 3 in 1 Training Program (Training, Certification, Work Placement) at Padang Industrial Training Center was at sufficient category. Reaction level (learning material indicators provided and modules) and result level (work replacement indicator) should be improved to make a 3 in 1 Training Program (Training, Certification, Work Placement) at Padang Industrial Training Center could be optimally organized. Based on the findings is 3 in 1 Training Program (Training, Certification, Work Placement) at Padang Industrial Training Center can proceed by making improvements at each of its levels.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Ambiyar dan Muharika. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program. Bandung: Alfabeta.
[2] Arikunto, Suharsimi & Cepi Safruddin AJ. 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Panduan Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan, edisi kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
[3] Arikunto, Suharsimi & Cepi Safruddin AJ. 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan, Panduan Teoritis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan, edisi kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
[4] Kirkpatrick, D.L., 2008. Evaluating Training Programs, The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publisher, Inc., San Francisco.
[5] Mardapi Djemari, 2012. Pengukuran Penilaian & Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
[6] Peraturan Menteri Perindustrian No: 40/M-IND/Per/5/2014 Tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Industri Balai Diklat Industri. http://jdih.kemenperin.go.id/site/baca_peraturan/1767
[7] PP RI Nomor 71 Tahun 1991 Tentang Latihan Kerja
[8] Sukardi, 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Kepelatihan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
[9] Wirawan. (2011). Evaluasi Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Depok: Rajawali Press, PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
[10] Wirawan. 2011. Evaluasi Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi, dan Profesi. Depok: Rajawali Press, PT Rajagrafindo Persada.