IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 6 - Issue 4, April 2017 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



A Study To Determine The Quality Of Building Stock And Earthquake Risk In Kirsehir

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Mehmet Mustafa Önal, Seda Çellek

 

KEYWORDS

Performance based analyse, Earthquake risk, Structrual damage length; topography

 

ABSTRACT

Technological developments, findings, and associated improvement of structural codes together with the change in the earthquake potentials and deficiencies of the old buildings necessitate the evaluation of the present building stocks. Both the Earthquake Regulations and the Seismic Zoning Map in Turkey have been going through a fast change in the recent years. Furthermore, the fact that the structural damage due to the recent earthquakes did not change according to the regions which is indicative of the building stock with low structural quality. Kirsehir is one of these regions with low quality buliding stock. Kirsehir is a developing region in relation to the increase in population and number of buildings in recent years. Accordingly, the heights of the buildings also increase in relation to the improving economical conditions. In contrary to the older masonry buildings of 1950s, the newer buildings are manufacturing using reinforced concrete. However, the lack of control mechanisms, designs according to lower eqarthquake risks without considering the the soil- structure relationship also make the more recent buildings prone to earthquake damage. In this study, the building stock in Kirsehir and its close surroundings (constructed before 1998) was considered and grouped in relation to their floor numbers, construction methods and some other properties. The performance analyses of the considered buildings were performed by taking into account the local soil conditions and construction material. Then, the earthquake risks of these buildings are calculated.

 

REFERENCES

[1] A.. Koçak, “Depreme Dayanıklı Yapı Tasarımı Ders Notları”, Yıldız Teknik üniversitesi, İnşaat Fakültesi, Yıldız, İstanbul, 2001.

[2] U. Ersoy, “Lessons to be learned from Erzincan 1992 Earthquake”, 2nd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 395-404, 1993, İstanbul (in Turkish).

[3] B. S. Şengezer, “The damage distirbution during march 13, 1992 Erzincan 1992 Earthquake”, 2nd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 404-416, 1993, İstanbul (in Turkish)

[4] T. Tankut, U. Ersoy, A. Koçyiğit, T. Wasti, D.Ural, “1 Ekim 1995 Dinar Depremi, Tübitak, İnşaat Teknolojileri Araştırma Grubu”, 1995, Ankara

[5] 17 Ağustos 1999 İzmit Körfezi Deprem Raporu, “Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı, Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü”, 2000, Ankara

[6] A.S. Elnashai, “Analysis of the Damage Potantial of the Kocaeli (Turkey) Earthquake of 17 August 1999”, Engineering Structures, 22, 746-754, 2000.

[7] M.Y Kaltakçı, M.H. Arslan, H. H. Korkmaz, M. Öztürk, “An Investigation on Failed or Damaged Reinforced Concrete Structures under Their Own-Weight in Turkey”, Engineering Failure Analysis, 14, 962-969, 2007.

[8] M. H. Arslan, H. H. Korkmaz, “What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced structures during recent earthquake in Turkey”, Engineering Failure Analysis, 14, 1-22, 2007.

[9] A. Doğangün, Ö. İ. Tuluk, R. Livaoğlu, R. Acar, “Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquake in Turkey”, Engineering Failure Analysis, 13, 981-996, 2006.

[10] İ. H. Çağatay, “Failure on an industrial building during a recent earthquake in Turkey, Engineering Failure Analysis”, 12, 497-507 , 2005.

[11] E. Özer, S. Pala, M. Karadaş, K. Girgin, E. Orakdöğen, “Evolution of Seismic Capacity of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings”, 2nd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 469-481, İstanbul, 1993 , (in Turkish).

[12] H. Tekel, E. Atımtay, “Analysis of an Earthquake Damaged Building and Lessons Learned”, 3rd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 567-577, İstanbul, 1995 , (in Turkish).

[13] T. Tankut, “İstanbul Kamu Yapıları Deprem Güvenliği Değerlendirilmesi Eylem Planı”, 4. Ulusal Deprem Mühendisliği Konferansı, 204-212, 1997, İstanbul.

[14] A. Koçak, “A study with a purpose to determine the structural defects and faults, the seismic risks of the existing buildings in various districts of İstanbul”, 2009.

[15] N. N. Çetinkaya, H. T. Durgunoğlu, F. H. Kulaç, T. Karadayılar, “Comparison of Earthquake Risk Analysis for Ankara, İstanbul and İzmir Regions”, 2nd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 539-547, İstanbul, 1993 , (in Turkish).

[16] J. S. Avcı, M. Erdik, “Earthquake Hazard Microzonation Methods”, 3rd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 357-367, 1995, İstanbul, (in Turkish)

[17] O. Gündoğdu, H. Eyidoğan, N. Türkeli, D. Kalafat, “Evaluation of Seismic Hazard of the Marmara Region and İstanbul City in Terms of Seismotectonics”, 3rd National Earthquake Engineering Conference, 367-377, İstanbul, 1995, (in Turkish)

[18] R. Kılıç, “Kırşehir ve İlçelerinde Meydana Gelen Depremler ve Afet Yönetmeliğine Göre Yapılması Gerekli Jeolojik ve Jeoteknik İncelemeler”, Kırşehir’ in Depremselliği ve Alınabilecek Önlemler Paneli, Kırşehir, 38-54 , 1998.

[19] N. Yıldız, “Kırşehir İli’ nin Depremselliği”, Erciyes Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kayseri, 2008.

[20] U. Temiz, “Kırşehir Dolayının Neotektoniği ve Depremselliği”, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 2004

[21] A. Koçyiğit, “Orta Anadolu’ nun Genel Neotektonik Özellikleri ve Depremselliği”, Haymana-Tuzgölü-Ulukışla Basenleri Uygulamalı Çalışma, TPJD, 5, 1-26, 2003.

[22] E. Parejas, H. N. “Pamir, Le tremblement de terre du 19 avril 1938 en Anatolie Centrale”. İst. Üniv, Fen. Fak. Yayınl., seri B., cilt IV, no. 3/4, 1939,

[23] JICA, “Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, İstanbul İli Sismik Mikro-Bölgeleme Dahil Afet Önleme/Azaltma Temel Planı Çalışması” İstanbul, 2002.

[24] M. Erdik, E. Durukal, Y. Albay, G. Birgören,“ İstanbul’ da Binalar İçin Deprem Riski ve Risk Azaltımına Yönelik Somut Bir Öneri”, İstanbul Depremi ve Güvenli Yapılar Toplantısı, İstanbul, 2001.

[25] E. Özer, S. Pala, E. Orakdöğen, K. Girgin, “Deprem Bölgelerindeki Mevcut Betonarme Yapıların Deprem Güvenliklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Rehabilitasyonu”, Türkiye Deprem Vakfı, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 1999.

[26] Türk Deprem Yönetmeliği, “Deprem Bölgelerinde Yapılacak Binalar Hakkındaki Yönetmelik”, Ankara, 2007.

[27] ATC-21, “Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings for Potential Seismic Hazards” Federal Emergency Management Agency”, FEMA-15, 1989.

[28] U. D. Ersin, E. Yüksel, A. Koçak, M. Hayashi, F. Karadoğan, “System Idenfication by Means of Mıcro Tremor Measurements”, Second Japan –Turkey Workshop on Eartquake Engineering, vol. I, 633-648, 1998, İstanbul.

[29] U. D. Ersin, “Küçük Titreşim Ölçümleri ve Dolgu Duvarlarının Mekanik Modele Yansıtılması”, İ.T.Ü. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul, 1997.

[30] K. Güler, E. Yüksel, A. Koçak, “Estimation of the Fundemantal Vibration Period of Existing RC Buildings in Turkey Utilizing Ambient Vibration Records”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 12(S2):140-150.J.M.P. Martinez, R.B. Llavori, M.J.A. Cabo, and T.B. Pedersen, "Integrating Data Warehouses with Web Data: A Survey," IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng., preprint, 21 Dec. 2007, doi:10.1109/TKDE.2007.190746.(PrePrint), 2008.

[31] Are Jeoteknik İmara Dayalı Jeolojik-Jeoteknik Rapor (Yayınlanmamış), 2008