IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 7 - Issue 6, June 2018 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Time And Cost Comparison Of Conventional And Alternative Plate Hollow Slab, Halfslab And Metaldeck

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Trijeti, Farid Dwi Atmawan, Muhamad Aswanto

 

KEYWORDS

floor slab, method, duration, cost.

 

ABSTRACT

With the development and fabrication of construction elements, the building owners have many choices on the material used. Particularly the structure of the floor slab of the building, in addition to ordinary reinforced concrete slab construction (conventional), there are other alternatives. The alternative construction is hollowslab, halfslab, metaldeck, palace and various other precast. From the variety of product alternatives floor slab, the author wants to compare alternatives such products with conventional floor slab. Step calculation is divided into two stages for each method, the calculation of the duration of the implementation and exercising their cost calculations. In calculating the duration of the implementation, the measure used is the volume of work items that were shared with the productivity tools or power. Arising from the duration, the cost can be calculated from the material, labor, equipment, etc. The results of the various methods of calculation, the next step is to compare the cost and time of each method. The calculations show that the least expensive method and its implementation is fast enough metaldeck method, with a duration of 107 days implementation and total cost Rp.4,687,322,686, -.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Andi Tenri Uji, "Perbandingan Biaya Pelaksanaan Pelat Beton Menggunakan Boundeck Dan Pelat Konvensional Pada Gedung Graha Suraco", Jurnal Universitas Hasanuddin

[2] Arief Rahman, "Tata Laksana Proyek", Jakarta, 1999

[3] BSN, SNI 7832:2012, “Tata Cara Perhitungan Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Beton Pracetak Untuk Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung”, Jakarta, 2012

[4] BSN, SNI 07-2052-2002, “Baja Tulangan Beton”, Jakarta, 2002

[5] Christanto, "Time Study Pemasangan Plat Pracetak pada Bangunan Gedung", Tesis Magister Teknik Sipil Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

[6] Michael Tedja Dkk, "Perbandingan Metode Konstruksi Plat Lantai Sistem Double Wire Mesh Dengan Sistem Half Slab", Jurnal Comtech Vol.4 No. 2 Desember 2013

[7] Naufal Aiman K, “Studi Perbandingan Penggunaan Teknologi Pelat Beton Konvensional Dan Pelat Beton Bondek Gedung Ball Room Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar”, Skripsi Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar, 2014

[8] Orry Giovanni, “Analisa dan Perencanaan Pelat Beton Pracetak Sistem Hollow Core Slab (HCS) untuk Pelat Satu Arah”, Tugas Akhir Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2008

[9] PT. PP, "Buku Referensi untuk Kontraktor Bangunan Gedung dan Sipil", Jakarta, 2005

[10] Peraturan Walikota Semarang, “Standarisasi Harga Satuan Bangunan , Upah Dan Analisa Pekerjaan Untuk Kegiatan Pembangunan Pemerintah Kota Semarang Tahun Anggaran 2015”, Semarang, 2015

[11] Rosyid Ambar Muhadi, "Analisis Metode Precast Half Slab Pada Proyek X", Intisari

[12] Soedrajat S, "Analisa (cara modern) Anggaran Biaya Pelaksanaan", Bandung, 1984

[13] Zainal Arifin, "Pembangunan Gedung Kanwil DJP Sumut I Dan KPP Di Medan Dengan Sistem Precast", Penghargaan Karya Konstruksi Indonesia Tahun 2013