IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 7, July 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Source And Potential Conflict In The Process Of Execution

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Muhammad Fitriadi, Suriyaman M Pidde, Hj. Nurhayati Abbas, H. Mustafa Bola

 

KEYWORDS

Keyword : source and potential , conflict in the process , execution

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Purpose of the study is to locate and describe Social Conflict can hinder / delay the execution process. Research conducted Southeast Sulawesi Province. in Kendari and Konawe, the location Chosen for s good, as Provincial growing so much the presence of the resistance of the losers and do not voluntarily accept the decision on the implementation of the Court's decision in executing the decision based on the results that have been legally binding , Social conflicts can postpone the execution is a process conducted by the losing party which does not implement the decision voluntarily so that efforts by the Court in the form of forced execution of the disputed objects involving a group of group / community or the mass to deter obstruct the process of execution in order to delay its implementation. The essence of forceful measures that should be implemented as it relates to the fairness of the search for justice through litigation, resulting from forceful measures sparked a riot / mass resistance / conflict that often occurs in practice. A source of conflict / clash is due; Lack of legal knowledge and legal awareness is low, where in fact there are some members of the public who do not voluntarily hand over the object in the case that has been broken off and has had permanent legal force, dissatisfaction with the loser of the final decision of the judge who then anger, realized through process execution. And the potential for conflict in execution, namely; The potential for conflict in a person or group of people, the potential for conflict due to the sense of injustice of execution carried District Court, The existence of potential conflicts due to expropriation of property rights violations in execution by the District Court.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Mukti Arto. 2005. Mencari Keadilan. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta. Hal. 98.

[2] Achmad Ali. 2002. Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). GunungAgung Tbk. Hal. 25)

[3] Ahmad. Rifai. 2011. Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. Hal. 126

[4] Kartini,Kartono. Kenakalan Remaja (Patologi sosial 2). Rajawali Press. Jakarta.2010 Hal: 106

[5] M.Yahya Harahap.2007. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Hal. 434.

[6] Mohammad Taufik Makarao.2004.Pokok-pokok Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

[7] Munir Fuady. 2003 Aliran Hukum Kritis Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, Hal. 52.

[8] Musakkir. Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Secara Berkeadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Amanagappa Vol. 21 No. 1 Maret 2013. Makassar. Hal.33.

[9] Nasikun, 1995. “Struktur Majemuk Masyarakat Indonesia”, dalam Sistem Sosial Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada. Hal. 29)

[10] Parsudi Suparlan, 2004, Hubungan Antar Suku Bangsa, KIK Press, Jakarta, hal. 208.

[11] Retnowulan Sutantio & Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Mandar Maju. Bandung. Hal. 109.

[12] Retnowulan Sutantio & Iskandar Oeripkartawinata. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Mandar Maju. Bandung. Hal. 109.

[13] Ritzer dan Goodman. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Kencana. Jakarta. 2010 hal: 153.

[14] Simon Fisher et all. 2000. Mengelola Konflik: Ketrampilan & Strategi untuk Bertindak (edisi bahasa Indonesia) Jakarta: The British Council, Indonesia.. Hal. 1.

[15] Soekarno Aburaera. 2012. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia. Arus Timur. Makassar. Hal. 10 ).

[16] Sudikno Mertokusumo. 1981. Hukum Acara Perdata. Liberty. Yogyakarta. Hal.8..

[17] Sukarno Aburaera. 2012. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia. Arus Timur. Makassar. Hal. 3-4.

[18] W. J. S. Poerwadarminta. 1976. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. PN. Balai Pustaka. Jakarta. Hal 784.

[19] Yahya Harahap. 2006. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata edisi kedua. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. Hal. 16.

[20] Zainuddin Mappong, 2010. Eksekusi Putusan Serta Merta: Proses Gugatan dan Tata Cara Membuat Putusan serta Pelaksanaan Eksekusi dalam Perkara Perdata. Cet. I. Tunggal MandiriPublishing. Malang Hal. 5.

[21] Zudan Arif Fakrulloh.2001. “Membangun Citra Hukum Melalui Putusan Hakim yang Berkualitas” Jurnal keadilan.Vol 1 No.3.Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Hukum dan HAM. Hal. 39.