International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 7, July 2015 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

The Effect Of Digital Imaging On Radiography Work Practice

[Full Text]



Mohamed M Abuzaid, Rasha Saad, W. Elshami, S. Alyafei



Keywords: Digital Imaging, Performance, Radiography, Work Practice



ABSTRACT: The use of digital imaging for the diagnostic purpose has been increased during last few years. This technique has brought advancement in the field of radiography. The effect of digital imaging on workflow has a direct relation with the performance of technologists. Aim: The predestined aim of this study was to analyze the use and influence of digital imaging on the workflow of the radiologists and also to demonstrate the effects on the overall performance of healthcare delivery. Method: A quantitative method of analysis is used in this study and the study instrument consisted of a questionnaire. The questions relates to the effect of digital imaging on workflow and image quality. Total of100 questionnaires were distributed, and 82 of them were retrieved back. The inclusion criteria include healthcare providers who are radiographers, radiologist and radiology nurses. The healthcare providers of all ages, gender, and ethnicity, were included in this study. Results: according to 70.2% of the study participants, digital imaging has reduced the workflow and processes of radiography, whereas, 96.3% of the participants reported that digital imaging technique has improved their clinical performance. Conclusion: It is therefore concluded that digital imaging is a valuable in improving the quality of diagnosis in the field of radiography. Further, it is highly cost-effective, time-saving, digital imaging shows a positive and promising effect on the work practice of radiologists and also provides improved diagnostic results.



[1] Kotre, CJ, Marshall NW. A review of image quality and dose issues in digital fluorography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiation protection dosimetry 2001; 94(12): 73-6. Retrieved from, http://rpd.oxfordjournals.org/content/94/1-2/73.short

[2] Cabrera A. Defining the role of a PACS technologist. Journal of digital imaging 2002; 15: 120-3. Retrieved from, http://www.springerlink.com/index/UHTX3N41RA0LDMGW.pdf

[3] Carrino, JA. Digital imaging overview.In Seminars in roentgenology. WB Saunders. 2003;38 (3): 200-215.

[4] Foord, K. Year 2000: status of picture archiving and digital imaging in European hospitals. European radiology 2000; 11(3): 513-24. Retrieved from, http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s003300000657

[5] Larsson, W., Aspelin, P., Bergquist, M., et al. The effects of PACS on radiographer's work practice. Radiography 2007; 13(3): 235-40. Retrieved from, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817406000186

[6] Lau, S L, Mak, A S H, Lam, WT, Chau, CK, Lau, KY. Reject analysis: a comparison of conventional film–screen radiography and computed radiography with PACS. Radiography, 2004, 10(3), 183-187. Retrieved from, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817404000719

[7] Larsson W, Lundberg N, Hillergård K. Use your good judgement–Radiographers’ knowledge in image production work. Radiography 2009; 15(3): e11-21. Retrieved from, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817408001016

[8] Fridell K, Aspelin P, Edgren L, Lindsköld L, Lundberg N. PACS influence the radiographer's work. Radiography 2009; 15(2): 121-33. Retrieved from, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881740800028X

[9] Strickland, N H. PACS (picture archiving and communication systems): filmless radiology. Archives of disease in childhood, 2000; 83(1), 82-86. Retrieved from,http://adc.bmj.com/content/83/1/82.full.html

[10] Wenzel A., Møystad A. Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review. ActaodontologicaScandinavica, 2010; 68(2), 106-114. Retrieved from, http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00016350903514426

[11] Compagnone G., Baleni M C., Pagan L, Calzolaio F L, Barozzi L, Bergamini C. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen–film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography. 2014. Retrieved from, http://www.birpublications.org/doi/full/10.1259/bjr/57138583

[12] Prabhu, S P., Gandhi S, Goddard P R. Ergonomics of digital imaging. Ergonomics, 2014; 78(931). Retrieved from, http://www.birpublications.org/doi/full/10.1259/bjr/51650129

[13] Hellén-Halme K, Nilsson M., Petersson A. Digital radiography in general dental practice: a field study. 2014. Retrieved from, http://www.birpublications.org/doi/full/10.1259/dmfr/95125494

[14] Seeram E. Irreversible compression in digital radiology.A literature review. Radiography 2006; 12(1): 45-59.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107881740500057X

[15] Haak R, WichtMJ, Nowak G, and Hellmich M. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries 2014.http://www.birpublications.org/doi/full/10.1259/dmfr/17654484

[16] Bryman A. Social research methods. Oxford University press 2012. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=vCq5m2hPkOMC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=advantages+of+quantitative+studies&ots=CKNiGp4_rw&sig=8-VZs9SKzwjI6ehFvgzURzsHxEY

[17] Barrett HH, Swindell W Eds. Radiological imaging: the theory of image formation, detection, and processing. Elsevier, 2012.https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=jzy2HqpCzFQC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=significance+of+image+detection+in+radiography&ots=AYipKQgvuQ&sig=2WaJ-FrnViRffSv98E-VGk_F3bY

[18] Cohenca N, Simon JH, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz, JM. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento‐alveolar trauma.Part 1: traumatic injuries. Dental Traumatology 2007; 23(2): 95-104. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00509.x/full

[19] CanessaJC, Canessa G, Canessa G G, Guan S. U.S. Patent No. 7,120,644. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 2006. https://www.google.com/patents/US7120644

[20] Rasha Saad, Jiyauddin Khan, VivegananthKrishnanmurthi, FadliAsmani, Eddy Yusuf: Effect of Different Extraction Techniques of Persicaria odorata Extracts Utilizing Anti-bacterial Bioassay. British journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 09/2014; 4(4):2146-2154.