IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 7, July 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Teaching Performance Of Former Principals In State Elementary Schools In Yogyakarta City

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Arief Efendi, Slamet, Udik Budi Wibowo

 

KEYWORDS

post power syndrome, teacher performance, teaching commitment, Yogyakarta City

 

ABSTRACT

This study analyzes the teaching performance of teachers in state elementary schools in Yogyakarta City, Indonesia, who were previously appointed as principals. The focus of the study was carried out on aspects of teaching commitment. The study was conducted qualitatively with a grounded theory approach. The research subjects were teachers who were previously principals in four state elementary schools in Yogyakarta City. The analysis was carried out with an interactive analysis model. The results show that the former principal's performance in Yogyakarta City decreased since the beginning of the assignment. They experience post power syndrome, reject assignments, experience obstacles in communication, and some of them have health problems. This result implies the need for a more comprehensive policy in preparing principals before their position end.

 

REFERENCES

[1] H. S. Weet. “The Duties of the School Principal”, The Elementary School Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 253-262, Dec. 1919.
[2] V. C. Morris, R. L. Crowson, E. Hurwitz, Jr. and C. Porter-Gehrie. “The Urban Principal: Middle Manager in the Educational Bureaucracy”, The Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 689-692, Jun. 1982.
[3] E. T. Ehiametalor. “Primary School Principals' Performance in Critical Administrative Task Areas”, The Journal of Negro Education, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 566-574, Autumn, 1985.
[4] B. Portin, P. Schneider, M. DeArmond, and L. Gundlach. Making Sense of Leading Schools: A Study of the School Principalship. Seattle: Center on Reinventing Public Education, Sep. 2003.
[5] R. R. Sheppard. “Determining Factors that Influence High School Principal Turnover Over a Five Year Period”. Denton, Texas: University of North Texas, Ph.D. Dissertation, May 2010. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc28476
[6] Wahjosumidjo. Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah: Tinjauan Teoritik dan Permasalahannya [Principal Leadership: Theoretical Review and Its Problems]. Jakarta : PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2002.
[7] Radar Jogja. Berkinerja Buruk, Jabatan pun Didegradasi: Kepala Sekolah Dijadikan Guru Biasa. Radar Jogja , February 7, 2019 retrieved from https://radarjogja.jawapos.com/2019/02/07/kepala-sekolah-dijadikan-guru-biasa/
[8] F. Dani. Implementasi Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional No 28 Tahun 2010 Tentang Batas Masa Jabatan Kepala Sekolah di Kota Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University, Undergraduate Thesis, 2012.
[9] M. Syah. Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru (Revisi). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.
[10] H. M. Marks and K. S. Louis. “Does Teacher Empowerment Affect the Classroom? The Implications of Teacher Empowerment for Instructional Practice and Student Academic Performance”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 245-275, Autumn, 1997.
[11] M. C. Kimwarey, H. N. Chirure, and M. Omondi. “Teacher Empowerment in Education Practice: Strategies, Constraints and Suggestions”, IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 51-56, Mar-Apr. 2014.
[12] R. C. Bogdan and S. K. Biklen. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1992.
[13] S. Faisal. Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar dan Aplikasi. Malang: YA3, 1990.
[14] S. Arikunto. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2006.
[15] J.W. Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publication, 2002.
[16] M. Q. Patton. Metode Evaluasi Kualitatif [How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
[17] Sugiyo. Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2014.
[18] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage Publication, 2014.
[19] E. Setiati and E. Yuliasari. Ketika Pensiun Tiba. Jakarta : Wijayata Media Utama, 2006.
[20] I. Nurhayati and Y. Indriana. “Harga Diri dan Kecenderungan Post Power Syndrome pada Pensiunan Pegawai Negeri Sipil Anggota PWRI Cabang Kota Cirebon”, Jurnal Empati, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 94-99, 2015.
[21] Y. Indriana and D. R. Desiningrum. “Post-Power Syndrome Tendency in Civil Servant's Retirees in Central of Java, Indonesia”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in Health Sciences (ICHS) Purwokerto, Indonesia, November 4-5, 2017.
[22] A. Rahmat and Suyanto. “Post-Power Syndrome dan Perubahan Perilaku Sosial Pensiunan Guru”, Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 77-94, Juni 2016.
[23] D.B. Gordon. Kerangka Dasar: Sistem Informasi Manajemen, Bagian I Pengantar. Seri Manajemen. Jakarta: PT. Pustaka Binawan Pressindo, 2006.