IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 3- Issue 10, October 2014 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Clinical Significance Of Creative 3D-Image Fusion Across【CT+MR】Modalities Based On Approach Of Characteristic Co-Registration

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Matthew Jian-qiao PENG, Jing-Ming WU , XiangYang JU , Dao-Zhang CAI

 

KEYWORDS

Index Terms— Characteristic Registration, Hybrid Radiodetector, MRI, CT, PET, Image Segmentation, Cross-modality Image Fusion.

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract— Since three-dimensional (3D) hybrid detector 【CT+MR】 is not integrated well currently, this study aims to investigate a registration scheme for two-dimensional (2D) hybrid based on characteristic localization to achieve 3D-fusion from the images of CT and MR as a whole. A cubic oriented proposal of “9-point & 3-plane” for coregistration designs were verified to be geometrically practical. Human internal-feature points were sorted to combine with preselected external-feature points for matching process through 3D-reconstruction and virtual-dissection. By following the procedures of feature-extraction and image-mapping, the processes of “picking points to form plane” and “picking planes for segment” were executed. Ultimately, image-fusions were implemented at the real-time workstation Mimics based on auto-fuse techniques so called “information exchange” and “Signal Overlaying”. A complementary 3D-image across 【CT+MR】 modalities, which simultaneously presents anatomic structures of hard-tissue and soft-tissue, was created with a detectable-rate of 70%, this is equivalent to detectable-rate of 【PET+CT】 or 【PET+MR】 with no statistically significant difference. Our approach of “9-point & 3-plane” offers a fresh idea for integration of digital imaging in mathematic consideration, and it facilitates a 3D vision that isn’t functional yet for 2D hybrid imaging. This exploration is practical to those small hospital that are unable to afford expensive hybrid equipment.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Schulthess GK, Schlemmer H-PW. A look ahead: PET/MR versus PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36:S3–S9.

[2] Ardekania BA., Guckemus S, Bachman A, et al. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans. J. Neurosci. Methods 2005; 142(1):67–76.

[3] Karlo CA, Steurer-Dober I, Leonardi M, et al., J.MR/CT image fusion of the spine after spondylodesis: a feasibility study. Eur Spine J 2010. 19: 1771–1775.

[4] Schlemmer H-P, Pichler BJ, Krieg R, et al. PET/MRI hybrid imaging: devices and initial results. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1077-1086.

[5] Peng MJ, Ju X, Khambay BS, et al. Clinical significance of creative 3D-image fusion across multimodalities 【PET+CT+MR】based on characteristic co-registration. European Journal of Radiology 2012, 81 (3): e406~e413.

[6] Okane K, Ibaraki M, Toyoshima H, et al. 18F-FDG accumulation in atherosclerosis: use of CT and MR co-registration of thoracic and carotid arteries, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2006; 33: 590-594.

[7] Schlemmer H-P, Pichler BJ, Krieg R, et al. An integrated MR/PET system: prospective applications. Abdom Imaging 2009; 34: 668–674.

[8] Brown LG. A survey of image registration techniques.ACM Computing Survey, 1992; 24:325-376.

[9] Schulz V, Torres-Espallardo I, Renisch S, et al. Automatic three-segment MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011; 38:138–152.

[10] Nakamoto Y, Tamai K, Saga T, et al. Clinical value of image fusion from MR-PET in patients with head & neck cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 2009; 11: 46–53.

[11] Heiss WD.The potential of PET/MR for brain imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2009; 36: S105–S112.

[12] Antoch G, Bockisch A.Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: S113–S120.

[13] Camara O, Delso G.; Colliot O, et al. Explicit incorporation of prior anatomical information into a nonrigid registration of thoracic and abdominal CT and 18-FDG whole-body emission PET images. IEEE Trans. Med Imaging 2007; 26: 164–178.

[14] Brix G, Nekolla EA, Nosske D, et al. Risks and safety aspects related to PET/MR examinations. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: S131 – S138 .

[15] Tahari AK, Bravo PE, Rahmim A, et al. Initial human experience with Rubidium-82 renal PET/CT imaging. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology 2014; 58: 25–31.

[16] Giovanella L, Lucignani G. Hybrid versus fusion imaging: are we moving forward judiciously?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: 973–979.