IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 8, August 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Criminal Law Reform Through The Application Of The Compensation Concept In The Settlement Of Corruption Cases

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Erianto N, Muhadar, Said K, Slamet S

 

KEYWORDS

Index Terms: Corruption, Compensation, Criminal Law Reform, Law Enforcement

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: This research reviews the essence of compensation concept as an additional penalty in the Indonesian criminal system as well as the extent of their impact on the effectiveness of financial indemnification of the state, and aims to provide an overview of the construction of the compensation concept in criminal law reform. The outcomes of the research indicate that there are the difference between perspective and point of view of the demands of the public prosecutor and the judge's decision concerning additional penalty for the compensation. The intention of the law makers to include additional criminal threats that everything is the same, namely in an effort to restore the country's financial losses arising out of the corruption cases. As it turns out in practice, however, it has certain weaknesses, particularly in view of the forming of criminal law which has no sticking to the principle, that adds to other criminal types on the types of crime that have been specified in the Indonesian Criminal Code it is forbidden. Therefore, to realize the main purpose of law enforcement concerning corruption case in order to save as much as possible the financial loss of the state, criminal compensation payments should be made as a "main penalty" not an "additional penalty". Based on such view, the compensation concept appears to be the ideal approach to be applied in the settlement of corruption cases.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Artidjo Arkotsar, Permasalahan Gratifikasi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Undang Undang Tipikor, Varia Peradilan Nomor 330 Mei 2013.

[2] Binsar Gultom, Kualitas Putusan Hakim Harus Didukung Masyarakat, Suara Pembaruan, 20 April 2006
[3] Emanuel Kant, Phylosophy of Law, Translated by: W. Haste, Edinburg, 1997.

[4] Gase Prayudi. 2007. Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti. Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan Tahun Ke XXII No 259 Juni 2007.

[5] Indonesian Audit Boards. 2012. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester II Tahun Buku V dalam Muhammad Yusuf. 2013. Miskinkan Koruptor! Pembuktian Terbalik Solusi Jitu Yang Terabaikan. Pustaka Juanda Tiga Lima.

[6] Indriyanto Seno Adji. 2009. Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum. Diadit Media. Jakarta.

[7] Ismujoko, Efektifitas Pidana Tambahan Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Sebagai Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Perkara Korupsi, Thesis, Padjajaran University, Bandung, 2003.
[8] Marwan Effendi. 2013. Korupsi & Strategi Nasional Pencegahan dan Pemberantasannya. Referensi (GP Press group). Jakarta.

[9] Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2011.

[10] Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI-Press, 2012.

[11] Sukardi, (2014), “Legitimacy of the Restorative Justice Principle in the Context of Criminal Law Enforcement”, Indonesia Law Review, 4(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v4n2.111

[12] Yudi Kristiana, Korupsi Politik di Indonesia, Komisi Yudisial & Keadilan Sosial, 2006.