IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 8, August 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Studentsí Learning Differences Contextual To Conventional Approach In Entrepenuership Course At University Of PGRI Palembang

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Boby Agus Yusmiono, Januardi, Riswan Aradea

 

KEYWORDS

Contextual Approach, Conventional Approach, Entrepreneurship

 

ABSTRACT

The contextual approach and conventional approach have the same goal, namely to improve and optimize student learning outcomes. Both of these approaches will be conducted by the researcher in the learning process at the PGRI Palembang University in the Social Sciences Department on entrepreneurship courses, fourth semester students in the 2016/2017 academic year. The method in this study is an experiment carried out with the intention to determine the difference between the learning outcomes of students who learn through the application of the contextual approach of 4th semester students of the Accounting Study Program with the conventional approach of 4th semester students of the Geography Study Program at the University of Palembang. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it can be concluded from the research that has been done, namely; (1) The average value of student learning outcomes in the class using a contextual approach is 8.3, with the number of students with Very Good (A) scores as many as 18 students from 50 students with a percentage of 36%. Whereas in the class that learns using the conventional approach, the average value of students is 8.4, with the number of students who have Very Good (A) scores as many as 17 students from 42 students with a percentage of 40.48%. (2) Based on the results of research that has been done, it is known that there are differences in student learning outcomes through the application of contextual approaches to conventional approaches to entrepreneurship courses. This can be seen from the results of the t test, the difference seen is t hitung = 3.561 and t table = 1.990 then Ho is rejected and accepted Ha. (3) Based on the analysis of the results of the research that has been conducted, it can be seen that learning using the conventional approach is slightly better than learning using a contextual approach to entrepreneurship courses.

 

REFERENCES

[1]. Agus Suprijono(2013). Cooperative Learning Theory and Applications PAIKEM Yogyakarta: Heritage Student
[2]. Alitha. 2012. Normal-false-false-false-en-us-x-none.http://re-alitha.blogspot.com (online). Accessed on March 18th, 2013.
[3]. Arikunto. 2010. Research An Approach Procedures. Praktik.Yogyakarta: Rineka Reserved
[4]. Mulyatiningsih, Endang.2012.Metode Applied Education Research. Bandung: Alfabeta
[5]. Riduwan. 2010. Learning Easy To Teacher-Employee Research and Researchers Starter. Bandung: Alfabeta
[6]. Riduwan. 2010. Introduction to Statistics for Research Education, Social Entrepreneurship, Communication and Business. Bandung: Alfabeta
[7]. Rohimah, Siti Maryam. 2011. Understanding-advantages and disadvantages.http://zonainfosemua.blogspot.com (online). accessed January 27, 2013
[8]. Sanjaya, Vienna. 2011. Learning Strategy Process Oriented Education Standards. Jakarta: Prenada Media
[9]. Slameto. 2010. Learning and factors that influence it. Jakarta: Rineka Reserved.
[10]. Yamin, Martinis. 2013. New Paradigm Learning. Jakarta: Reference