IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 8, August 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



A Mathematical Programming Approach To Aggregating Raw Scores Into A Course Grade

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Badreddine Jerbi

 

KEYWORDS

learning assessment, grade system, scores, aggregation, mixed integer program

 

ABSTRACT

Teachers use tests, quizzes, assignments, labs, exams… to evaluate the students' learning. This assessment leads to grades which are vital to students, their parents and teachers. The ways the scores are combined are diverse and differ from one course to another and different ways of combination may result in different grade. What is precarious is to see that a method of aggregation can result in a failure of a student and another method produces a success for the same student. In this paper and based on the results in a semester course, I try to find the best weights that have to be allocated to the tests, the quizzes, assignments, labs and exams with a a mixed linear program that if were used, they would have maximized the number of successes. An immediate benefit is to implement those weights for the following semester the course is offered.

 

REFERENCES

[1]. Reeves, Douglas (2008) Leading to change/Effective grading Educational Leadership 65(5) pp85-87.
[2]. Wankat, P., Oreovicz, F (2015) Teaching Engineering, Second Edition Purdue University Press chapter 11.
[3]. Tinkelman, D. Venuti, E. Schain, L (2013). Disparate Methods of Combining test and assignment scores into course grades Global Perspectives on Accounting Education Volume 10, 61-80.
[4]. Wilson, I (2008) Combining assessment scores – a variable feast Medical Teacher; 30: 428–43
[5]. McLachlan, J. Marks, S (2000) scores and grades: scaling and aggregating student’s assessment outcomes Medical Education 34:788–797
[6]. Douglas, R., Mislevy, J (2010) Estimating Classification Accuracy for Complex Decision Rules Based on Multiple Scores Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 280–306
[7]. Vanderbei,J. Scharf, G. Marlow, D (2014) A Regression Approach to Fairer Grading SIAM REVIEW Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 337–352
[8]. Mcnamara, J (1973). Mathematical programming applications in education planning. Socio Economic Planning Science. Vol. 7, pp. 19-3
[9]. Johnes, J (2015) Operational Research in Education, European Journal of Operational Research Volume 243, Issue 3, 16 June 2015, Pages 683–696
[10]. Linear Interactive Discrete Optimization (LINDO) www.lindo.com.
[11]. Cplex12.1.