IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 2- Issue 10, October 2013 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



On The Conversion Of Gas Oil In Fluid Catalytic Cracking Risers: Application Of Residence Time Distribution (Rtd) Concept

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

H.A. Affum, I.I. Mumuni, G.K. Appiah, S.Y. Adzaklo, M. A. Addo

 

KEYWORDS

Index Terms: Conversion, gasoline, residence time distribution, risers, Tank-In-Series model

 

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Risers are considered vital parts on fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) conversion units. It is inside the riser that the heavy hydrocarbon molecules are cracked into petroleum fractions such as gasoline and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). A simplified kinetic flow model in combination with the Tank-In-Series model was used to predict the conversion response of an FCC riser to changes in feed temperature, feed flow rate as well as riser diameter and height. The various Residence Time Distribution (RTD) functions and flow-model parameters are used in the characterization of the mixing regime of the riser and the degree of any non-ideal flow behaviour. Conversion was observed to increase with increasing riser height and diameter with values of 95.16% and 94.0% at a riser height of 80 m and diameter of 1.0 respectively. Conversion also increased with increasing feed temperature. A feed flow rate of 10 m3/s is converted at 95.95 % whiles a feed flow rate of 40 m3/s is converted at 89.72%, indicating an inverse relationship between conversion and feed flow rate. The simulation also revealed that the riser reactor is equal to approximately 1-2 perfectly stirred tanks in series as conversion started to decrease after an N, the number of tanks in the Tank-In-Series model, of 1.5.

 

REFERENCES

[1]. Moharir, A.S., Sarae, S.K., Kinetic Modeling of Vacuum Gasoil Catalytic Cracking, Chem. Age of India, 35; 433-440, (1984).

[2]. Landeghem, F.V., Nevicato, D., Pitualt, I., Forissier, M., Turlier, P., Derouin, C. and Bernard, J.R. Fluid Catalytic Cracking: Modeling of an Industrial Riser. Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 138, pp.381-405, (1996)

[3]. Theologos, K.N., and Markatos, N.C Advanced modeling of fluid catalytic cracking riser-type reactors. AIChE J, 43,486-493, (1993).

[4]. Derouin, C., Nevicato, D., Forissier, M. ,Wild, G.,& Bernard, J.R. Hydrodynamics of riser units and the impact on FCC operation. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 36, 4504–4515, (1997)

[5]. Arandes, J. M. and H. I. Lasa. Simulation and Multiplicity of steady states in fluidized FCCUs, Chem.Eng.Sci., 47, 2535-2540,(1992)

[6]. Arbel, A., Z. Huang, I.H. Rinard, R. Shinnar and A.V. Sapre. Dynamics and control of fluidized catalytic crackers. Modeling of the current generation FCC.s. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34: 1228-1243, (1995)

[7]. Han, I. S. and Chung, C. B. Dynamic modeling and simulation of a fluidized catalytic cracking process Part I: Process modeling, Chem.Eng.Sci., 56, 1951-1971, (2001)

[8]. Ali, H., S. Rohani and J.P. Corriou. Modeling and control of a riser type Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) unit. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 75(A4): 401-412. (1997).

[9]. Coxon, P.G., and Bischoff, K.B., Lumping Strategy. Introduction To Techniques and Application of Cluster Analysis, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 1239- 1248, (1987).

[10]. Bollas,G.M., Lappas, A.A., Iatridis, D.K. and Va-salos,I.A. Five-Lump Kinetic Model with Selective Catalyst Deactivation for the Prediction of the Cracking Process, Catalysis Today, Vol. 127, No. 1 , pp. 31-43,(2007).

[11]. Juarez, J. A., Isunza, F. L., Rodriguez, E. A. and Mayotga, J. C. M.; A strategy for Kinetics Parameter Estimation in the Fluid Catalytic Cracking Process, Ind.Eng.Chem. Res., 36, 5170-5174, (1997)

[12]. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiotracer Residence Time Distribution method for industrial and environmental applications, IAEA-TCS-31(2008), Vienna.

[13]. Levenspiel, O., 1999. Chemical Reaction Engineering. 3rd Edn., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York.

[14]. Richardson, J.F. and D.G. Peacock, Coulson and Richardson’s Chemical Engineering, 3rd Edn., Pergamon, Great Britain, 3: 71-80, 102-103. (1994).

[15]. Smith, J.M., H.C. Van Ness and M. M. Abbott, (1996). Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, 5th Edn., pp: 64-5, 189-91, 604-8, 831-37, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

[16]. Fogler, H.S., Elements of Chemical Engineering Reaction. 2nd Edn., Prentice-Hall of India Private Ltd., New Delhi, pp: 708-723, 759-765, (1997).

[17]. Ahari, J.S, Farshi, A. and Forsat, K. A. Mathematical Modeling of the Riser Reactor in Industrial FCC Unit. Petroleum & Coal, 50 (2), 15-24, (2008).

[18]. Chang, S.L., Lottes, S.A., Zhou, C.Q. and Petrick. M A numerical study of short residence time FCCriser flows with a new flow/kinetics modeling, submitted to International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nov. 15-20, (1998), Anaheim, CA

[19]. Dasila, P.K., Choudhury, I., Saraf, D., Chopra, S., Dalai., A Parametric Sensitivity Studies in a Commercial FCC Unit. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 2, 136-149, (2012).

[20]. Dagde, K.K., and Puyate, Y. T. Six-lump kinetic modeling of adiabatic plug-flow riser-reactor in an industrial FCC unit. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. Vol. 2, Issue 6 , pp.557-568, 557, 2012