International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us

IJSTR >> Volume 3- Issue 9, September 2014 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Energy Absorption Capacity of A GRFP Composite under Impact of High Velocity Projectiles

[Full Text]



Onyechi, Pius C., Obuka Nnaemeka, S.P., Agbo, Cornelius O., Igwegbe, Chinenye A.



Keywords: Energy Absorption, GFRP Composite, Ogival and Conical Projectiles, Simpsonís 1/3 Rule, Area under Curve, Ballistic Deformation.



Abstract: In this work, a glass fibre reinforced composite laminates was developed for amour body application. Six samples of this composite laminates were formed with thicknesses of 28mm (Sample E), 24mm (Sample D), 20mm (Sample C), 16mm (Sample B), 12mm (Sample A), and 8mm (Sample F). These samples were targeted using two types of life bullets (Ogival and Conical nosed) moving at a velocity of 355m/s. Energy absorption capacity of these composite laminates was determined as a measure of area under the stress-strain curve through the application of the Simpsonís 1/3 rule. Sample E of the GFRP composite gave an optimum absorption energy capacity of 1.956 MJ after ballistic deformation (theoretical) which is greater than the kinetic energies of the conical projectile (456.676 J) and the ogival projectile (348.85 J) obtained from experimental analysis, energy absorption capacities of Samples A-D were also greater then these values. This indicates the ability of the developed composites (Samples A-E) to absorb the projectilesí kinetic energy without perforation.



[1] Onyechi, P.C., Edelugo, S.O., Ihueze, C.C., Obuka, S.P.N., and Chukwumuanya, E.O. (2013). High Velocity Impact Response Evaluation of a Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) Composite: Amour Body. International Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 5, Pp 242-255.

[2] Patel, B.P., Bhola, S.K., Gamapathi, M., and Makhecha, D.P. (2004). Penetration of Projectiles in Composite Laminates. Defense Science Journal, Vol.54, No. 2, Pp151-159.

[3] Abrate, S. (1994). Impact on Laminated Composites: Recent Advances. Application Mechanics Review, Vol. 47, Pp 517-544.

[4] Cantwell, W.J., and Morton, J. (1991). The Impact Resistance of Composite Materials: A Review. Composites, Vol. 22, Pp 347-362.

[5] Naik, N.K., and Doshi, A.V. (2008). Aerospace Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, Powai, Mumdai 400 076.

[6] Naik, N.K., and Shrirao, P. (2004). Composite Structures Under Ballistic Impact Composite Structures, Vol. 66. Pp 570-590.

[7] Naik, N.K., Shrirao, P., and Reddy, B.C.K. (2005). Ballistic Impact Behaviour of Woven Fabric Composites: Parametric Studies Material Science Engineering A, Vol. 412, Pp 104-116.

[8] Naik, N.K., Shrirao, P., and Reddy, B.C.K. (2006). Ballistic Impact Behaviour of Woven Fabric Composites: Formulation. International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 32, Pp 1521-1552.

[9] Al-Hamdan, A., Yassin, L.N., and Ramadan, J.M. (2010). Ballistic Impact Fracture Behaviour of Continuous Fibre Reinforced Al-Matrix Composites, Vol. 4, No. 5, Pp 605-614.

[10] Jacob, G.C. Fellers, J.F., Simunovk, S., and Sarbuck, J.M. (2002). Energy Absorption in Polymer Composites for Automotive Crashworthiness. Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 36, No. 7, Pp 813-850.

[11] Meyers, M.A. (1994). Dynamic Behaviour of Materials, Wiley, New York.

[12] Nesterenko, V.F. (2001). Dynamics of Heterogeneous Materials, Springer, New York.

[13] Wood, R. (1980). Car Body in Glass Reinforced Plastic. Pentech Press Limited, London, pp 43 - 45.

[14] Cartridges of the World (.22 caliber). http://www.wikipedia.com/.22 short.

[15] Chapra, S.C., and Canale, R.P. (2008). Numerical Methods for Engineers. 5th Ed. McGraw Hill Publishers, India. Pp 478-496.

[16] Wen, H.M. (2000). Predicting the Penetration & Perforation of FRP Laminates Struct Normally by Projectiles with Different Nose Shapes. Composite Structures, 49, 321 Ė329.