IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 7 - Issue 8, August 2018 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



The Right To Be Forgotten In Public Domain Arrangements In Social Media In Indonesia

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Syafruddin Pohan

 

KEYWORDS

internet media, right to be forgeten, Indonesia.

 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze how Law no. 19 of 2016 on Information and Electronic Transactions (UU ITE) regulates the position of new norms regarding the right to be forgotten in Indonesia. Indonesia became the first Asian country to apply the concept. The right to be forgotten is a norm in the field of cyber law. It was born out of a desire to restore the control function of personal information circulating on the internet to the personalities of each person. Although this concept is adopted from EU countries, it is not the same application in Indonesia. Deletion of content in the EU or Russia or other countries that apply only limited to the search engine (search engine), in Indonesia is not like that. It is expressly referred to in Article 26 paragraph (3) of the revision of the ITE Law: "Every Operator of Electronic System shall remove Electronic Information and / or irrelevant Electronic Documents under its control at the request of the Person concerned pursuant to the court's determination". The results obtained 1). In Indonesia one can request a direct removal of irrelevant content, while in many countries the implementation of the right to be forgotten is limited to search engines, 2) content that can be applied for removal not only of content relating to personal data, but more broadly . 3) to irrelevant information or electronic documents, one may request removal pending judicial appointment.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Bagdikian, Ben H, The New Median Monopoly, Boston: Beacon Press, 2004.

[2] Chazawi, Adami, Hukum Pidana Positif, Malang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya2008

[3] Creswell, John W, Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

[4] Day, Louis Alvin, Ethics in Media Communications: Cases and Controversies (Fifth edition), Australia-Spain: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006.

[5] Dencin, Norman K. and Yvonna S. Lincoln, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research 1, Thrid Edition, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2011.

[6] Dominick, Joseph, R, The Dynamics of Mass Communications: Media in the Digital Ag (9th Edition), Boston-Toronto: McGraw-Hill International Edition, 2007.

[7] Fuady, Munir, Filsafat dan Teori Hukum Postmodern, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.

[8] Kriyantono, Rachmat, Teknnik Praktis Riset Komunikasi, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.

[9] Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum. (Edisi Revisi), Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013.

[10] Mertokusumo, Sudikno, Bab-Bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum, Bandung: PT. Cita2013

[11] Adfytia Bakti. Nasution, Bahder Johan, Metode Penelitian Hukum, , Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.

[12] Pohan, Syafruddin, Ekonomi Politik Media: Sejarah, Teori dan Penerapan, Medan: USU Press, 2016.

[13] Rasjidi, Lili, Dasar-Dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Bandung: PT. Citra Adytia Bakti, 2012.

[14] Suhariyanto, Budi, Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime): Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa, 2013.

[15] Suparni, Niniek, Cyberspace: Problematika Dan Anstisipasi Pengaturannya, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2009.

[16] Suratman dan Philip Dillah, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.

[17] Suteki, Desain Hukum di Ruang Sosial, Semarang: Thafa Media. 2013.

[18] Wright, Charles R, Sosiologi Komunikasi Massa, Bandung: CV Remadja Karya, 1985.

[19] Pratama, Adytia Hadi, At https://id.techinasia.com/pertumbuhan-pengguna-internet-di-indonesia-tahun-2016. Access on on 18 January 2018.

[20] Expert: Google Can Not Escape French Law on Right to Delist. Yibada.com. ]https://support.google.com/legal/contact/lr_ eudpa?product=websearch. Access on 27 June 2018.

[21] http://klikonsul.com/hak-untuk-dilupakan-manfaat-perlindungan-dan-potensi-penyalahgunaan/ Acess on 1 November 2017.