IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 11, November 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Energy-Efficient And Improved Qos -Driven Task Scheduling Algorithm In Mcc Environment Using Cloudsim Simulator

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Dr.G.Anandharaj, K.Suganthi

 

KEYWORDS

Mobile Cloud Computing, QoS, Genetic Algorithm, Differential Evolution, Energy-efficient, Task Scheduling.

 

ABSTRACT

As an evolving and prospective computing paradigm, mobile cloud computing (MCC) can significantly improve computing capacity and save energy from intelligent mobile devices. Because of some intrinsic mobile device defects, such as restricted battery power, inadequate storage space, and mobile apps, many mobility management problems, quality of service (QoS), energy management, and safety problems are faced. A mobile device implementation is known as Task. The main focus of the task scheduling is to improve the effective use of resources and thus reduce the completion time of the task. This research explores relative analysis of energy-efficient and improved QoS-driven tasks Scheduling (E2IQDTS) algorithms for optimizing multi-objective problem in a Mobile Cloud Computing Environment scheduling parameters such as Makespam, Dynamic Offloading, Deadline-satisfied, Task Length, Priority, Delay-Sensitive, etc. Evolutionary algorithms such as Genetic Algorithm (GA), Genetic Programming (GP) and Differential Evolution (DF) are used.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Conti, Marco, et al.: Future Internet research difficulties. Communications from computers, 34(18), 2115–2134 (2011).
[2] Carthik, Kumar, and Y. H. Lu. Cloud Mobile User Computing: Can Computer Offload Save Energy? Computer, 51-56 (2010), 43(4).
[3] Satyanarayan, Mahadev, et al.: Mobile Computing Case for VM-based Cloudlets. Pervasive computing of IEEE, 8(4), 14-23(2009).
[4] Xia, W. Liang, Qiufen, and W. Xu.: Maximizing the performance of internet application admissions in portable cloudlets. In: Local Computer Networks (LCN), 38th IEEE Conference, pp. 589-596. Sydney(2013)
[5] M.R. Garey & D. S. Johnson,: Computers and intractability: a NP-Completeness theory guide. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1979
[6] Hung P P, Bui T A, Huh E N: A New Mobile Cloud Computing Task Scheduling Optimization Approach. Electrical Engineering lecture notes, 301, pp.211-220 (2014).
[7] Chen L, Li Y, Zhao Y, et al. RAS: A Resource Attribute Selection Task Scheduling Algorithm in a Task Scheduling Framework. In: Internet and Distributed Computing Systems International Conference, pp. 106-119, Berlin (2013).
[8] Deng S, Huang L, Wu H, et al.: Mobile Cloud Computing Constraints-Driven Service Composition. In: IEEE International Web Services Conference, San Francisco (2016), pp. 228-235.
[9] Wang J, Tang J, Xue G, et al.: Smartphone planning of energy-efficient tasks in portable audience detection devices. Computer Networks, pp.100-109 (2017), 115(C).
[10] Awad, A.I., El-Hefnawy, N.A., Abdelkader, H.M.: Improved Particle SwarmOptimization for Cloud Computing Environments Task Scheduling. Computer of the procedures. Sci. 65, (2015) pp. 920–929.
[11] Chen, H., Zhu, X., Guo, H., Zhu, J., Qin, X., Wu, J.: Towards energy-efficient real-time planning in a cloud-based environment. J. Syst. Softw., 99 (2015), pp. 20–35.
[12] Wu, X., Deng, M., Zhang, R., Zeng, B., Zhou, S.: a cloud-driven QoS-based scheduling algorithm. Computer Procedia, 17, pp.1162–1169(2013).
[13] Lee, Y.C.; Wang, C.; Zomaya, A.Y.; Zhou, B.B. Profit-driven data access sensitivity planning for cloud services. J. Distribute in parallel. Comput., 72 (2012), pp.591–602.
[14] Panda, S.K., Gupta, I., Jana, P.K.: Heterogeneous Multi-cloud Systems Allocation-aware Task Scheduling. Computer Procedia, 50, pp. 176–184 (2015).
[15] Razaque, A., Vennapusa, N., Soni, N., Janapati, G.: Cloud computation tasks. In: Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference (LISAT) proceedings of the IEEE, pp.1-5, Farmingdale(2016).
[16] Sindhu, S. Cloud Task Scheduling. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Eng. Technol. Last year, 4, 3019–3023.
[17] Mahmood A, Khan S.: Hard Real-Time Task Using an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm in Cloud Computing. Computers (2017), 6(2):15.
[18] Lin X, Wang Y, Xie Q, et al.: Mobile Cloud Computing Environment Task Scheduling for Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling for Energy Minimization. IEEE Services Computing Transactions, 8(2), pp. 175-186 (2015).
[19] Guo S, Xiao B, Yang Y, et al.: Mobile web computation for energy-efficient vibrant downloading and asset planning. In: The International Computer Communications Conference of IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 1-9, San Francisco (2016).
[20] Tsai, J.T., Fang, J.C., Chou, J.H.: Optimized cloud computation system job planning and resource allocation using enhanced differential development algorithms. Comput. Oper. Res. 40 (2013), pp. 3045–3055.
[21] Liu, S., Quan, G., Ren, S.: On-line profitable and punishment planning of real-time facilities. In: Proceedings on Applied Computing at the 2011 ACM Symposium, pp.1476–1481, Taiwan (2011).
[22] Kim, K.H., Beloglazov, A., Buyya, R.: Power-aware delivery of real-time cloud services to virtual machines. Concurr. Comput. 23, pp. 1491–1505.
[23] Deniziak, S.; Ciopinski, L.; Pawinski, G.; Wieczorek, K.; Bak, S. Using evolutionary genetic programming to optimize real-time cloud applications. In the IEEE / ACM Seventh International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC) Proceedings, pp. 774–779, London(2014).
[24] Holland J H. Natural and synthetic system adaptation [M]. Press from MIT, 1992.
[25] Goldberg, David E. Search, Optimization and Machine Learning Genetic Algorithms. xiii.7(1990):2104–2116.