IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 10, October 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



The Efficiency Of Local Governments And Its Influence Factors

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Andy Yusfany

 

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Local Government Output Indicator, Technical Efficiency, Sosio-Economic and d\Demographic Factors, DEA and Tobit.

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Assessing the relative efficiency of local governments using Data Envelopment Analysis, which are used as input aggregate total expenditure per capita and Local Governvent Output Indicator (LGOI) is used as an aggregate output of each local government. Results showed that local governments can improve the services performance without increasing the spending. Furthermore, the efficiency scores is associated with sosio-economic variables and demographic by using analysis of Tobit, the results show that the variable fiscal as transfer funds and silpa negatively and significantly to the local government efficiency, while the variable population density and degree of fragmentation of political parties and positive effect significantly to the local government efficiency.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. 2008. Assessing and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Local Government. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1946–1979.

[2] Borge, L.-E., Falch, T., & Tovmo, P. 2008. Public Sector Efficiency : the Roles of Political and Budgetary Institutions, Fiscal Capacity, and Democratic Participation. Public Choice, 136, 475–495.

[3] Borger, B. De, & Kerstens, K. 1996. Cost efficiency of Belgian Local Governments : A Comparative Analysis of FDH , DEA , and Econometric Approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(1996), 145–170.

[4] Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (second edi.). New York: Springer.

[5] Geys, B., & Moesen, W. 2009. Measuring Local Government Technical (In)Efficiency : An Application and Comparison of FDH, DEA, and Econometric Approaches. Public Performance & Management Review, 32(4), 499–513.

[6] Ibrahim, F. W., & Karim, M. Z. A. 2004. Efficiency of Local Governments in Malaysia and Its Correlates. IJMS, 11, 57–70.

[7] Jorge, S. M., Camoes, P. J., Carvalho, J. B. D. C., & Fernandes, M. J. 2006. Portuguese Local Government Relative Efficiency : A DEA Approach. 8th CIGAR Workshop on Performance Measurement and Output Based Budgeting in the Public Sector, Hamburg, Germany. Kalb, A. 2010. The Impact of Intergovernmental Grants on Cost Efficiency : Theory and Evidence from German Municipalities. Economic Analysis and Policy, 40(1), 23–48.

[8] Kuncoro, H. 2004. Pengaruh Transfer Antar Pemerintah Pada Kinerja Fiskal Pemerintah Daerah Kota dan Kabupaten di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, (34), 47–63.

[9] Nieswand, M., & Seifert, S. 2011. Some Determinants of Intermediate Local Governments’ Spending Efficiency : The Case of French Départements. DIW Discussion Paper, 1130(May).

[10] Prud’homme, R. 1995. The Dangers of Decentralization. The World Bank Research Observer, 10(2), 201–220.

[11] Rondinelli, D. A., McCullough, J. S., & Johnson, R. W. 1989. Analysing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries : a Political-Economy Framework. Development and Change, 20(1), 57–87.

[12] Schwab, R. M., & Oates, W. E. 1991. Community Composition and The Provision of Local Public Goods : A Normative Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 44, 217–237.