IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 6 - Issue 10, October 2017 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Reading Approach Use, Effectiveness And EFL Reading Comprehension In University Muhammadiyah Of Parepare

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Baharuddin, Elihami

 

KEYWORDS

cognitive approach; metacognitive approach; effectiveness; EFL Reading Comprehension

 

ABSTRACT

This study investigated Indonesian EFL learnersí approach of two reading approaches (cognitive and metacognitive), their perceived contact on effectiveness, and the association between reading approach and effectiveness on their English reading comprehension. Fifty-Three English-major freshmen from University Muhammadiyah of Parepare participated in these lessons. Two principal questions were addressed: (1) what is the most frequent use of reading approach reported by individual students? (2) Is there any significant association between reading approach and effectiveness on their English reading comprehension? To examine the effects of approach instruction on studentsí reading performance, a qualitative interview technique and quantitative research methods including a paired-sample t-test and Person Product Moment Correlation were used to estimate the relationship between reading approach use and effectiveness on studentsí reading accomplishment. Significance showed that the most frequent use of reading approach was found to be metacognitive approach, followed by the cognitive approach. In addition, there was a significant positive connection between reading approach and effectiveness on their English reading comprehension. Reading approach, on the other hand, was unrelated to reading achievement. Results of interview findings were analyzed to explore in-depth in sequence about the condition of approach used. The implications of these findings for implementing effective reading strategy instruction are discussed.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational research, 97 (4), 171-184.

[2] Baker, W., & Boonkit, K. (2004). Learning strategies in reading and writing: EAP contexts; Heinle & Heinle.

[3] Baker, L., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Metacognitive Skills in Reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York: Longman.

[4] Bandura, A. (1994). Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4). Academic Press.

[5] Barnett., M.A. (1989). More than meets the eye. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

[6] Carrell, P.L. (1989). Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Reading. The modern language journal, 73 (2), 121-134.

[7] Caverly, D. (1997). Teaching reading in a learning assistance center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Serveices No. ED 478 373).

[8] Caverly, D.C. & Orlando, V. P. (1991). Textbook study strategy. In R.F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly (Eds). Teaching reading and study strategies at the college level. (pp.86-165). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[9] Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Teaching learning strategies in foreign language intstruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22 (1), 13-24.

[10] Chamot, A. U., Robbins, J., & El-Dinary, P. B (1993). Learning strategies in Japanese foreign language instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370-346).

[11] Elihami.(2016).The Challenge of Religious Education in Indonesia Multiculturalism. Vol. 5, No. 4, American Research Institute for Policy Development.

[12] Kai-Fat, Lee and Paula Flaming. (1979). Better Reading Skills. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press.

[13] Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies; what every teacher should know, Toronto, Canada: Heinle & Heinle.

[14] Philips, D (1996). Longman preparation course for the TOEFL test. N.Y. Addison-Weslay.

[15] Pintrich. P.R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31. 459-470.

[16] Pintrich, P.R., & Garcia, T. (1991) Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds)., Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

[17] Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Tech. Rep. No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Regents of the University of Michigan.

[18] Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26,207-231.

[19] Shang, H. F. (2007, May). Reading strategy training for the development of EFL reading comprehension. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China (ROC-TEFL) 424-442, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.

[20] Sweet, A.P., & Anderson, J.I. 1993. Reading Research in to 2000. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

[21] Wakkang, Hamzah. 2004. Teaching Reading Comprehension through Comparative Learning to Third Year Students of SLTP 1 Suppa Pinrang. Unpublished Thesis. Makassar: PPs UNM.

[22] Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R.E (1986). The teaching of Learning Strategies.In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on teaching (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmilan.

[23] Winstead, L. (2004). Increasing academic motivation and cognition in reading, writing, and matemathics: Meaning-Making strategies. Educational Research Quarterly, 28 (2), 30-49.