IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 6 - Issue 10, October 2017 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Selection Of Best Alternative For An Automotive Company By Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Method

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Zulqarnain M., Dayan F.

 

KEYWORDS

MCDM, IF-TOPSIS, Intuitionistic fuzzy positive ideal solution (IFPIS), Intuitionistic fuzzy negative ideal solution (IFNIS), Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFS), interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFN). Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM).

 

ABSTRACT

Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) uses different techniques to find a best alternative from multi-alternative and multi-criteria conditions. Classical TOPSIS uses crisp techniques for the linguistic assessments, but due to imprecise and fuzziness nature of the linguistic assessments, there must be some tools to deal this vague information. In this paper, we discuss about Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS (IF-TOPSIS) and use this method for the selection of best alternative for an automotive company.

 

REFERENCES

[1] C. Hwang and K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, A State of the Art Survey, vol. 1. 1981.

[2] S.J. J. Chen and C.-L. Hwang, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods, vol. 375. 1992.

[3] C.T. Chen, “Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2000.

[4] A. Awasthi, S.S. Chauhan, and S.K. Goyal, “A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty,” Math. Comput. Model., vol. 53, no. 1–2, pp. 98–109, 2011.

[5] T.C. Chu, “Selecting plant location via a fuzzy TOPSIS approach,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 859–864, 2002.

[6] D. Yong, “Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 7–8, pp. 839–844, 2006.

[7] Y.M. Wang and T.M.S. Elhag, “Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 2006.

[8] W.M. Dong and F.S. Wong, “Fuzzy Weighted Averages and Implementation of the Extension Principle,” vol. 21, pp. 183–199, 1987.

[9] S. Mahmoodzadeh, J. Shahrabi, M. Pariazar, and M. S. Zaeri, “Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique,” Int. J. Soc. Manag. Econ. Bus. Eng., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 324–329, 2007.

[10] T. Yong‐tao, L. Shen, C. Langston, and Y. Liu, “Construction project selection using fuzzy TOPSIS approach,” J. Model. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 302–315, 2010.

[11] L. A. Zadeh, “The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 199–249, 1975.

[12] H. Q. Saremi and G. A. Montazer, “An application of type-2 fuzzy notions in website structures selection: Utilizing extended TOPSIS method,” WSEAS Trans. Comput., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2008.

[13] T. Y. Chen and C. Y. Tsao, “The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 159, no. 11, pp. 1410–1428, 2008.

[14] Zulqarnain M., and Saeed M., “An application of Interval valued fuzzy soft matrix (IVFSM) in decision making, “Sci. Int. (Lahore), vol. 28, no. 3, 2261-2264, 2016.

[15] Zulqarnain, M., and Saeed. M., “Comparison between fuzzy soft matrix (FSM) and interval valued fuzzy soft matrix (IVFSM) in decision making, “Sci. Int. (Lahore), vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 4277-4283, 2016.

[16] Zulqarnain, M., and Saeed, M., “A New Decision Making Method on Interval Valued Fuzzy Soft Matrix (IVFSM), “British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1-17, 2017.

[17] B. Ashtiani, F. Haghighirad, A. Makui, and G. Ali Montazer, “Extension of fuzzy TOPSIS method based on interval-valued fuzzy sets,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 457–461, 2009.

[18] A.K. Verma, R. Verma, and N. C. Mahanti, “Facility Location Selection: An Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach,” Journal of Modern Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 4, no. 2. pp. 68–72, 2010.

[19] C.C. Hung and L. H. Chen, “A Fuzzy TOPSIS Decision Making Model with Entropy Weight under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment,” Proc. Int. MultiConference Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. I, pp. 18–21, 2009.

[20] D.F. Li and J.X. Nan, “Extension of the TOPSIS for Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making under Atanassov IFS Environments,” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. Appl., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 47–61, 2011.

[21] Z. Nurandiah and A. Lazim, “A TOPSIS Method with intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making,” Proc. 10th Int. Annu. Symp. UMTAS, no. July, pp. 256–65, 2011.

[22] F.E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, and D. Akay, “A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11363–11368, 2009.

[23] F. Ye, “An extended TOPSIS method with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for virtual enterprise partner selection,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 7050–7055, 2010.

[24] K.T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets Syst., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, Aug. 1986.

[25] F.E. Boran, S. Genç, M. Kurt, and D. Akay, “A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 11363–11368, 2009.