IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 6 - Issue 10, October 2017 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Calculus Based On Contextual Learning Model To Cultivate Student’s Activity, Interest And Mathematical Connection Ability

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Nana Sepriyanti, Ahmad Fauzan, I Made Arnawa, Lufri

 

KEYWORDS

model of learning, contextual teaching and learning, calculus

 

ABSTRACT

The preliminary study on Calculus classes in Department of Mathematics of Tarbiyah Faculty of IAIN Imam Bonjol Padang, reveals that the instructional process and materials that the lecturer used not yet facilitated the students to construct their own learning in calculus. The effectiveness of learning calculus is still low and the learning process is still conventional. So that, it needs for the development of calculus-based contextual learning model. The purposes of this research were to develop a model of calculus based contextual learning (CBCL) that is valid, practical, and effective. But, in this article, it just discussed about the effectiveness of this model. A Design research was conducted to develop a model of calculus instruction through contextual based adapted from the model suggested by Plomp [18]. The design research phases involved preliminary research, prototyping phase and assessment phase. The research data were qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative data were collected through observation and questionnaires and quantitative data were obtained through testing and observation activities of students. The result of prototype phase showed that the Syntax calculus-based contextual learning model consists of five phases, namely: (1) Phase 1. Delivering objective, Giving Motivation and Apperception, (2) Phase 2. Organize the students into groups and Delivering learning how to learn, (3) Phase 3. Guided group work, (4) Phase 4. Guiding and Class Discussion (5) Phase 5. Reflection and Evaluation. The improvement of the model of CBCL at the effectivity test show that the all four aspects of assessment obtain the effectivity percentage value with effective category, that is the result of students activity observation of the model of CBCL is 70,5% with effective category, students learning interest questionnaire of the model of CBCL is 76,5% with effective category, the IWS score is 74,39 with effective category. The students’ mathematical connection ability taught by using the model of CBCL is higher than the student mathematical connection ability taught by using conventional learning.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Berns, R and Se-Stefano,J, 2001. Best Practise in Contextual Teaching and Learning (A Research Monograph). Office of Vocational and Adult Education.

[2] Berns, R.G and Erickson, P.M, 2001. Contextual Teaching and Learning. The Highlight Zone : Research a Work No. 5 (Online) Available: http: //www.ncte.org/publications/infosyntesis/highlight 05/index.asp ?dirid = 145 & dspid =1.

[3] Bishop, A.J., Clements, K., Keitel, Ch., Kilpatrick, J. and Laborde, C. (eds.): 1996, International Handbook on Mathematics Education, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

[4] Czocher, Jennifer & Baker, 2010. Contextual Learning in Math Education for Engineers. The Ohio State University, Department of Mathematics, Columbus, OH 43201, USA.

[5] DiSessa, A.A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B. and Kolpakowski, T.: 1991, ‘Inventing graphing: meta-representational expertise in children’, Journal of Mathematical Behavior 10, 117–160.

[6] Fauzan, A. 2002. Applying Realistic Mathematics Education in Teaching Geometry in Indonesian Primary Schoos. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

[7] Gravemeijer, K.: 1994, ‘Educational development and educational research in mathematics education’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25 (5), 443–471.

[8] Gravemeijer, K.: 1999, ‘How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics’, Mathematical Thinking and Learning 1 (2), 155–177

[9] Gravemeijer, Koeno & Doorman, Michiel, 1999. Context Problems in Realistic Mathematics Education: A Calculus Course as an Example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Kluwe Academic Publisher. The Netherlands.

[10] Johnson, Elaine B, 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning . California: Corwin Press.

[11] Joyce, B, Weil, M., with Shower, 1992. Models of Teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

[12] Kaput, J.J.: 1994b, ‘Democratizing access to calculus: new routes to old roots’, in A.H. Schoenfeld (ed.), Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hove, UK.
[13] Latorre, Donald R.; Kenelly, John W.; Reed, Iris B.; Biggers, Sherry, 2007. Calculus Concepts: An Applied Approach to the Mathematics of Change, Cengage Learning, ISBN 0-618-78981-2, Chapter 1, p 2 at http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkulus.

[14] Meira, L.: 1995, ‘The microevolution of mathematical representations in children’s activity’, Cognition and Instruction 13 (2), 269–313.

[15] National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (NCTM), 2000. Principles and standars for school mathematics. USA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. www.nctm.org.

[16] Nieveen, Nienke, 2013. Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research at Tjeerd Plomp and Nienke Nieveen (Ed). An Introduction to Educational Design Research. SLO. Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development.

[17] Penglase, 2010. Learning Approaches in University Calculus: The Effects of an Innovative Assessment Program. University of Western Sydney.

[18] Plomp, Tjeerd, 2013. Educational Design Research: An Introduction to Educational Design Research.

[19] Streefland, L.: 1990, Fractions in Realistic Mathematics Education, a Paradigm of Developmental Research, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

[20] Tall, D.O.: 1985, ‘The gradient of a graph’,Mathematics Teaching111, 48–52.

[21] Tall, D.O.: 1986, ‘A graphical approach to integration’,Mathematics Teaching 114, 48–51.

[22] Tall, D. (Ed.): 1991, Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers,Dordrecht.

[23] Treffers, A.: 1991, ‘Didactical background of a mathematics program for primary education’, in L. Streefland (ed.),Realistic Mathematics Education in Primary School,CD-ß Press, Utrecht, pp. 21–57.

[24] Zhang, Biao, 2003. Using Student-Centred Teaching Strategies in Calculus. Department of Mathematics Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin 150001 People’s Republic of China.

[25] Zhou,Yuan, 2002. Improving the Qualities of Teaching Calculus by Using Modern Education Theories and Modern Technology. Department of Mathematics Fudan University People’s Republic of China.