IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 10, October 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Csr Fostering And Production Externalities Solving With Integrated Networking. An Italian Mix-Method Case Study

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Michela Cortini

 

KEYWORDS

Intercorporate Social Responsibility, Industrial Symbiosis, Stakeholders perspective, SMEs, mix-methods

 

ABSTRACT

The present paper, based on the concept of intercorporate social responsibility, aims at investigating the role of corporation networks in green management and, in more general terms, in social and environmental responsibility behaviour. The general theoretical perspective from which we start is that of industrial and organizational psychology.The theoretical framework to which we refer is a triangulation of, on one side, the International literature on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Social Performance (CSP), which are ethical in nature, and, on the other, the International literature on externalities and industrial symbiosis, which are more business oriented, in the effort to integrate business and ethics. The paper, which is theoretical in nature, presents in its final section a case study relating to a project involving a consortium of 60 Italian organizations which exchange production externalities through an electronic platform to which they are all connected 24 hours a day. We have proposed to these organizations an action-research in the shape of appreciative inquiry intervention the present paper presents the main results of. The originality of the paper derives, in theoretical terms, from the concept of intercorporate social responsibility and from the application of the principles of industrial symbiosis at a Small and Medium Enterprise level, thanks to ICT support. In such a way, externalities may be seen along with an appreciative perspective which transforms them in a tool of organizational development.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Shum, P. K. & Yam, S. L. 2011. Ethics and Law: guiding the invisible hand to corporate social responsibility externalities. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 549-571.
[2] Egri, C.P. & Ralston, D. A. 2008. Corporate responsibility: A review of international management research from 1998 to 2007. Journal of International Management, doi:10.1016/j.intman.2007.09.003
[3] Frederick, W.C. 1978. From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought. Working Paper 279, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Business.
[4] Waddock, S. 2000. The multiple bottom lines of corporate citizenship: social investing, reputation and responsibility audits. Business and Society Review, 105, 323-345.
[5] Doh, J. P. & Teegen, J. 2004. Globalization and NGOs. Transforming Business, Governments, and Society. Westport, Conn., Praege.
[6] Basu, K. & Palazzo, G. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility: a process model of sense-making. Academy of Management Review, 33, 1, 122-136.
[7] Sethi, S.P. 1975. Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 58-64.
[8] Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of Management Review, 497-505.
[9] Wartick, S.L. & Cochran, P. L. 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 758-769.
[10] Clarke, J. 1998. Corporate social reporting: an ethical practice, in Blake, J. and Gowthorpe, C. (Eds.), Ethical issues in accounting. London, Routledge, 184-199.
[11] Lantos, G. P. 2001. The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 7, 595-630.
[12] Branco, M. C. & Rodrigues, L. L. 2007. Positioning Stakeholder Theory within the Debate on Corporate Social Responsibility. Eletronics Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 12,1, 1-11.
[13] Werhane, P. & Freeman, R. 1999. Business ethics: the state-of-the-art. International Journal of Management Review, 1, 1,1-16.
[14] Husted, B. W. 2005. Risk management, real options, and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 60, 175-183.
[15] Kogut, B. 1991. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science, 37, 1, 19-33
[16] Burt, R. 1983. Corporate philanthropy as a cooptive relation. Social Forces, 62: 419-49.
[17] Webb, N. J. & Farmer, A. 1996. Corporate goodwill: A game theoretic approach to the effect of corporate charitable expenditures on firm behaviour. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 67: 29-50.
[18] Ellen, P., Mohr, L. & Webb, D. 2000. Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix?Journal of Retailing, 76: 393-406.
[19] Sen, S. & Bhattacharya, C. B. 2001. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing, 38: 225-43.
[20] Turban, D. B. & Greening, D. W. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 658-672.
[21] Melè, D. 2009. The practice of networking: an ethical approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 487-503.
[22] Frosch, R. A. & Gallopoulus, N. E. 1989. Strategies for manufacturing in managing Planet Earth. Scientific American, September, 144-153.
[23] Porter, M. E. 2000. Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 1, 15-34.
[24] Lambert, A.J.D. & Boons, F. A. 2002. Eco-industrial parks: timulating sustainable development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation, 22, 471-484.
[25] Converso, D.; Loera, B.; Viotti, S.; Martini, M. 2015. Do positive relations with patients play a protective role for healthcare employees? Effects of patients’ gratitude and support on nurses’ burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 470.
[26] Cortini, M., Converso, D., Galanti, T., Di Fiore, T., Di Domenico, A., & Fantinelli, S. 2019. Gratitude at Work Works! A Mix-Method Study on Different Dimensions of Gratitude, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance. Sustainability, 11(14), 3902.
[27] Fielding, N. G. & Fielding, J. L. 1986. Linking Data. Beverly Hills, Sage.
[28] Flick, U. 1992. Combining methods. Lack of methodology: discussion of Sotirakopoulou & Breakwell, Ongoing Production on Social Representations, 1, 1, 43-48.
[29] Cortini, M. 2014. Mix-method research in applied psychology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1900-1905. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p1900
[30] Cortini, M. & Tria, S. 2014. Triangulating qualitative and quantitative approaches for the analysis of textual materials: An introduction to T-lab. Social Science Computer Review, 32(4), 561-568. doi: 10.1177/0894439313510108
[31] Verrocchio, M. C., Cortini, M., & Marchetti, D. 2012. Assessing child sexual abuse allegations: An exploratory study on psychological reports. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 6(2), 175-186. doi:10.5172/mra.2012.6.2.175
[32] Fry, R. 2008. Foreword to Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., Stavros, J. M. Handbook of Appreciative Inquiry: for leaders of change, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[33] Cortini, M. & Ligorio, M. B. (eds) 2007. Economia del dono. Aspetti psicosociali nello scambio delle esternalità tra imprese. Roma, Aracne.
[34] Coopperrider, D.L. & Whitney, D 2001. A positive revolution in change. In Cooperrider, D. Lorenson, P., Whitney, D. & Yeager, T. (eds.) Appreciative Inquiry: An Emerging Direction for Organization Development. Champaign, IL, Stipes, 9-29.
[35] Bushe, G.R. 2011. Appreciative inquiry: Theory and critique. In Boje, D., Burnes, B. and Hassard, J. (eds.) The Routledge Companion To Organizational Change. Oxford, UK, Routledge, 83-103.
[36] van der Haar, D. & Hosking, D. M. 2004. Evaluating Appreciative Inquiry: a relational constructionist perspective, Human Relations, 57, 8, 1017-36.
[37] Fry, R. 2007. Generative inquiry vs. positivity in appreciative inquiry. Paper submitted as part of the symposium, 20 Years of Appreciative Inquiry: The Best of the Past, Present, and Future, Philadelphia, Academy of Management Conference.
[38] Gheno, S. 2010. La Formazione Generativa. Milano, Franco Angeli.
[39] Boje, D. M. 1995. Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as 'Tamara Land’. Academy of Management Review 38: 997-1035.
[40] Czarniawska, B. 1999. Writing management: Organization theory as a literary genre. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
[41] Gabriel, Y. 2000. Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions, fantasies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
[42] Manuti, A., Traversa, R., & Mininni, G. 2012. The dynamics of sense making: A diatextual approach to the intersubjectivity of discourse. Text and Talk, 32(1), 39-61.
[43] Manuti, A., & Mininni, G. 2010. Metaphor as an expressive resource of human creativity in organizational life. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution, 66(5), 335-350.
[44] Fogarassy, C., Horvath, B., & Magda, R. (2017). Business model innovation as a tool to establish corporate sustainability. Visegrad Journal on Bioeconomy and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 50-58.