IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 11, November 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



The Must Of Academic Text And Their Normative Effect On Quality Of Law

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Ricca Anggraeni

 

KEYWORDS

Academic Script, Law, quality, judicial review..

 

ABSTRACT

Article 43 of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Establishment of Legislation clearly stipulates that Academic Manuscripts are a condition that must be fulfilled in the process of establishing legislation, with the hope that the resulting legislation becomes an effective and efficient product to fulfill community legal needs. It's just that empirically, this necessity is only fulfilled as a formality so that the process of forming laws is in accordance with the procedures stipulated through legislation. With a pattern like this, finally the quality of the Act is not significantly affected, with the existence of laws that are not in accordance with the material content, or unable to accommodate the legal needs of all Indonesian people, so judicial review must be submitted to the Constitutional Court. This empirical situation is interesting to study by taking a sample of the Act produced after the enactment of Law Number 12 of 2011. The study was conducted by asking the question why the Academic Script is required does not affect the quality of the law produced? The question becomes very important to solve because there will be found factors or argumentative reasons that are the cause of the infertility of Academic Scripts to produce quality laws.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Anggono, B. D. (2014). Perkembangan pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
[2] Badan Pusat Statistik (2017). Laporan Perekonomian Indonesia 2016. Jakarta: Nario Sari.
[3] Fuller, L.L. (1973). The Morality of Law, Revised edition Ninth Printing. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
[4] Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-undangan: Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
[5] Mahesa, D. J., Mustofa, A., & Saripudin, H. A. (2013). DPR offside: otokritik parlemen Indonesia. Jakarta: RMBooks.
[6] Nursyamsi, F. (2012). Catatan Kinerja DPR 2011 Legislasi: Aspirasi atau Transaksi. Jakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia.
[7] Tanujaya, C. (2017). Perancangan standart operational procedure produksi pada perusahaan coffeein. Performa, 2(1), 90-95.
[8] Tyesta, L. (2013). Menata Ulang Kerangka Hukum Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Menuju Negara Hukum Demokratis. Dissertation of the Doctor of Law Science Program. Diponegoro University, Semarang.

INTERVIEW
[9] Maria Farida Indrati Soeprapto, Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, was interviewed on Monday, October 3, 2016 at the Constitutional Court Building, Jln. Medan Merdeka Barat.
[10] Interview with Inosentius Samsul, Head of the Central Committee for the House of Representatives 'Expertise Act, Secretariat General of the House of Representatives' Expertise Body, Jakarta, 3 January 2018.)