International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 10, October 2015 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Effect Of Spacing And Fertilizer On The Growth And Yield Of Onion

[Full Text]



Mohd. Rezaul Islam, Amrita Mukherjee, Khan Golam Quddus, Prashanta Kumar Sardar, Mosharraf Hossain



Index Terms: Spacing, Fertilizer, Onion, STB, IPNS, Yield, RCBD



Abstract: The experiment was conducted at the On-Farm Research Division (OFRD), Agricultural Research Station, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) Daulatpur, Khulna to study the effects of spacing and fertilizer on the growth and yield of onion. Three spacing viz. 10 × 10 cm, 15 ×10 cm and 15 × 15 cm with three fertilizer combinations viz. soil test based fertilizer dose (STB); integrated plant nutrient system (IPNS) based fertilizer dose and farmers’ practice were studied on the growth and yield of onion. The two factor experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The size of unit plot was 1.5 × 1.2 m. The results demonstrated that plant spacing had significant effects on growth, yield components and yield of onion. Different fertilizers exhibited significant variation in respect of individual bulb weight, bulb diameter and yield. The maximum bulb weight and yield were recorded in IPNS based fertilizer dose while the combined effect of fertilizer and plant spacing had significant effect on growth and yield of onion. The highest yield was obtained from the spacing of 15 × 10 cm coupled with IPNS based fertilizer dose and the lowest yield was found in 15 × 15 cm spacing with farmers’ practice.



[1] Badaruddin, M. and M. A. Haque. 1977. Effect of time of planting and spacing on the yield of onion ( Allium cepa L.). Bangladesh Hort., 5 (2): 23-29.

[2] Bashar, M. A. 1976. The effect of spacing on the growth and the yield of potato. M. Sc. (Ag.) thesis, Department of Horticulture, BAU, Mymensingh.

[3] BBS, 2010. Yearbook of Agriculture Statistics of Bangladesh. Crop estimate, Chapter 3.

[4] BBS, 2010.Yearbook of Agriculture Statistics of Bangladesh. Export and import of Agricultural products and inputs, Chapter 11.

[5] Branjes, P. J., J. de Wit, H. G. van der Meer and H. van Keulen. 1996. Environmental Impact of Animal Manure Management: International Agriculture Center, Wageningen, Netherlands. http://www.fao.org.

[6] Coelo, E. F., V. A. B. Souza-de, M. A. F. Conceicao and V. A. B. De souza. 1996. Performance of onion crops under three irrigation regimes and five spacing. Pesquisa –Agropecuaria- Brasileira, 31 (8): 585-591.

[7] Das, B. C. and K. C. Dhyani. 1956. Influence of different spacing and nitrogen fertilizer on growth and yield on onion. Phyton, 6: 47-56.

[8] Dixit, S. P. 1997. Response of onion (Allium Cepa L.) to nitrogen and farm yard manure in dry temperate high hills of Himachal Pradesh. Indian J. Agril. Sci., 67 (5): 222-223.

[9] FAO, 2003. Production year book. Food and Agriculture organization of United Nations, Rome, Italy, 57: 91-94.

[10] Gomez, K. A and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research (2nd edn.). John Willey & Sons, New York, p. 28-192.

[11] Jones, H. A. and L. K. Mann. 1963. Onion and their allies. Leonard Hill (books) Ltd. London. P. 32.

[12] Khushk. A. M. Miano, A. H. Ansari and M.I. Mari. 1990. Influence of inter and intra row spacing on the yield and the yield components on onion (Allium cepa L.). Sarhad J. Agric., 69 (2): 147-150.

[13] L’Hermite, P., P. Sequi and J.H. Voorburg. 1993. Scientific basis for environmentally safe and efficient management of livestock farming: Report of the Scientific Committee of the European Conference Environment, Agriculture and Stock Farming in Europe, Mantova 1991-1992. Mantua Italy, European, Conference.

[14] Mehla, C. P., K. S. Baswana, B. S. Saharan and J. S. Taya. 1993. Effect of row spacing and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of onion. Prog. Hort., 25(3-4).

[15] Mondal, M. F. J. L. Brewster, F. E. L. Morris and H. A. Butler. 1986. Bulb development in onion (Allium cepa L.). Effect of plant density and sowing date in field conditions. Ann. Bot., 58(2):187-195.

[16] Nasiruddin, K. M., M. F. Mondal, A. M. Farooque and M. A. Baten. 1993. Effect of potassium and sulphur on growth and yield of onion. Bangladesh J. Agril. Sci., 20(1):35-40.

[17] Nichols, M. A. and W. Heydecker. 1964. Onion sets at four by six gave the highest returns.

[18] Rahman S. M. R. Talukder and A. M. Miah. 1976. Effect of different doses of NPK on the yield of onion (Allium cepa). Bangladesh Hort., 3(1): 41-44.

[19] Rizk. T. Y., M. T. Fayed, S. M. El-Nagar and H. Fawzy. 1991. Effect of plant spacing on weeds, growth, yield and its components of onion (Allium cepa) Egyptian J.Agron., Special issue L 71-80.

[20] Singh, R. V. 1995. Response of onion to plant spacing and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization. Res. J. Birsa –Agril .Univ., 7 (2): 141-143.

[21] Sotffela, P. J. 1996. Panting arrangement and density of transplants influence Sweet Spanish onion yields and bulb size. Hort. Sci., 31(7): 1129-1130.

[22] SRDI, 2005. Survey of Agro ecological Zone (AEZ) no. 3. Rangpur. P. 13.

[23] Vacchani, M. U. and Z. G. Patel. 1993. Growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa) as influenced by nitrogen, phosphurs and potash under South Gujrat condition. Prog. Hort., 25 (3-4): 166-167.

[24] Zubeldia., A. and J. L. Gases, 1977. The effect of spacing and number of stem on the earliness and total yield of tomato cultivars. Production vegetable.