Effectiveness Of An Mhrd Workshop On Instrumentation – An Empirical Study
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Prof. B. William Dharma Raja, Dr V. Sasikala
KEYWORDS
Credible Research Instrument, Instrumentation, Quality Research, Workshop Effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Instrumentation refers to the tools or means by which investigators attempt to measure variables or items of interest in the data-collection process. Present paper evaluates the effectiveness of the workshop on instrumentation organised by the Centre for Techer Resource and Academic Support, under School of Education sanctioned under Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya National Mission on Teachers and Teaching (PMMMNMTT) scheme by the MHRD, Government of India in imparting knowledge on construction of a quality research tool among/for research scholars and young supervisors. Pre-test post-test single group design was adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the workshop on imparting important criteria, principles, development and construction of a quality research instrument. The subjects for the study were 25 research scholars and young supervisor who were the participants of the workshop from four states of India. The data was collected using an ‘Achievement Test on Tool Construction’ developed and validated by the investigators. The twelve hours of intensive lectures and hands on training on instrumentation piloted by two well renowned resource persons were the intervention. The results of paired t-test analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant difference among research scholars and young supervisors. The findings of the study revealed that workshop on instrumentation significantly impacted the participants to gain knowledge of designing a reliable, valid and credible research instrument.
REFERENCES
[1] John W. Best, and J.V. Kahn, Research in Education (9thed), New Delhi: Prentice- Hall of India, 2006.
[2] C.L. Kimberlin and Almut G. Winterstein, “Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in researchâ€. Am J Health-Syst Pharm, 65, 2008, available at http://www.ajhepworth.yolasite.com/resources/9817-Reliabillity%20and%20validity.pdf
[3] A.C. De Souza, N.M.C. Alexandre, and E.B. Guirardello, “Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validityâ€, Epidemiol. Serv. Saude, BrasÃlia, vol. 26, no. 3, 2017, doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022.
[4] N.J. Salkind, “Encyclopedia of research designâ€, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2010, doi: 10.4135/9781412961288H.
[5] S.S. Salmond, “Evaluating the reliability and validity of measurement instrumentsâ€, OrthopNurs, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 28-30, 2008, Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/18300685K.
[6] X. Wang, and S.Y. Lee, “Investigating the psychometric properties of a new Survey instrument measuring factors related to upward transfer in STEM fieldsâ€, The Review of Higher Education, vol. 42, no. 2, pp.339-384, 2019.
|