IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 1, January 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Effect Of Planting Device And Seed Sorting On Yield Of Maize.

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

P. Osei Bonsu, R. Owusu Bio, H. Omae, F. Nagumo

 

KEYWORDS

Index terms: Maize, jab planter, seed sorting, economic analysis, cost benefit ratio.

 

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Experiments were conducted at the CSIR-Crops Research Experimental station at Kumasi, Ghana, to determine the effects of seed sorting and planting device on yield of maize in the 2014 major growing season. Two jab planters were used to plant sorted and unsorted seeds. The control treatment was cutlass planting of unsorted seed. One of the jab planters was imported from China; and the other was fabricated in Ghana. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with 3 replications. Planting one hectare of maize with the Chinese planter took about 10 hours, 36 minutes; the local planter took 12 hours 39 minutes, whilst cutlass took 29 hours 36 minutes. Seed sorting and planting device had no significant effect on maize yield. However it was faster, cheaper and economically more viable to plant with jab planter than with cutlass.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Abuzar M.R., Sadozai G.U., Baloch M.s., Shah I.H., Javaid T., and Hussain N. 2011. Effect of plant population densities on yield of maize. The journal of Animal and plant sciences, 21 (4), 692-695.

[2] Adjei E.O., Aikins S.H.M., Boahen P., Chand K., and Teklu a. 2003. Combining mechanization with conservation agriculture in the transition zone of Brong Ahafo Region, Ghana. ICRA Working Document Series 108, International Centre for Development Oriented Research in Agriculture, Wageningen.

[3] Casini P. 2012. Maize production as affected by sowing date, plant density and row spacing in the Bolivian Amazon. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International development, 106 (2) 75-84.

[4] CIMMYT. 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations. An economic training manual. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF.

[5] Gustavo, A.M., Alfredo G.C and Otegui M.E. 2006. Row width and maize grain yield. Agron. J., 98: 1532-1543.

[6] Hawkins R. C. and Cooper P. J. M. (1979). Effects of Seed Size on Growth and Yield of Maize in the Kenya Highlands. Experimental Agriculture, 15, pp 73-79. doi:10.1017/S0014479700009224.

[7] Hudson N. 1987. Soil and water conservation in Semi-arid areas. FAO Soils Bulletin 57. FAO, Rome.

[8] Medeiros J.B., De Viana A.C., 1980. Sowing date, spacing and plant density for maize cultivation. Informe Agropecuario, 6:72, 32-35.

[9] Sangakkara U.r., Bandaranayake P.S .R .D., Gajanayake J. N., and Stamp P. 2004. Plant populations and yield of rainfed maize grown in wet and dry seasons of the tropics. Maydica. 49:83-88.

[10] Trenton, F., S. and Joseph G.L. 2006. Optimum plant population of Bacillus Thuringiensis and non Bacillus Thuringiensis corn in Wisconsin. Agron J., 98:914-921.

[11] Zaki M.S., Paigham S., Shaukat H., 1994. Effect of date of sowing on maize and non-flooded land rice. Sarhad journal of Agriculture. 10:2, 191-199.