IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 11, November 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Justice In Granting Remission For Corruption Prisoners (A Review Of Indonesian Criminal Justice System)

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Mispansyah, Said Karim, Irwansyah, Harustiati A. Moein

 

KEYWORDS

Index Terms: Corruption, Criminal Justice System, Legal Policy, Remission

 

ABSTRACT

Abstract: "Prisoners are entitled to have a reduction in criminal past (remission)" as stipulated in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System still being debated to this day. This research reviews the essence of the implementation of the substantive law in granting remission against inmate corruption cases from the perspective of public and individual interests. The type of research used in this paper is socio-legal research, reviewing remission policy from the perspective of the criminal law system with philosophical and statute approach. The outcomes of the research indicate that the implementation of granting remission for corruption prisoners does not provide justice, both procedural and substantive, does not provide legal expediency and arising imbalance of justice for individuals, communities and countries. The need to implement remissions with impartial justice for corruption prisoners in granting remission, to be useful for individuals, communities and countries.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Emerson Yuntho. 2014. “Polemik Remisi Dan Pembebasan Bersyarat Untuk Koruptor”. Artikel. Dokumentasi data ICW. Jakarta.

[2] Ermansjah Djaja. 2010. Meredesain Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.

[3] Ezzat A.Fattah.1976. the Use of The Victim as an Agent of Self Legitimation: Toward a Dynamic Explanation of Criminal Behavior. Dalam Viano.Emilio. Victims and Society. Visage Press. Washington D.C.

[4] Edwin Firdaus. 2014. “ICW Sesalkan Kebijakan Menkumham Beri Remisi 49 Napi Korupsi”. Available online at: http://www.tribunnews.com/nasional/2014/12/25/icw-sesalkan-kebijakan-menkumham-beri-remisi-49-napi-korupsi. Accessed January 2, 2015.

[5] Henry Campbell Black. 1990. Black’s Law Dictionary. Sixth edition. West Publishing Co.St. Paul MN.

[6] J.E.Sahetapy. 1995. Bunga Rampai Viktimisasi. Eresco. Bandung.

[7] Lawrence M Friedman. 1984. American Law, W.W. Norton & Company. New York.

[8] Mardjono Reksodiputro. 1997. Kriminologi dan Peradilan Pidana. Penerbit Lembaga Kriminologi UI. Jakarta.

[9] Marwan Effendy. 2014. Teori Hukum Dari Perspektif Kebijakan, Perbandingan dan Harmonisasi Hukum Pidana. Gaung Persada Press Group. Jakarta.

[10] Mohammad Askin. 2011. Peran Hakim Dalam Penerapan Pasal 2 dan Pasal 3 UU Tipikor Pada Dakwaan Subsidiaritas atau Alternatif. Artikel Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan Tahun XXVII No.311 Oktober 2011. IKAHI. Jakarta.

[11] Romli Atmasasmita. 2004. Sekitar Masalah Korupsi Aspek Nasional dan Aspek Internasional. Mandar Maju. Bandung.

[12] Sukardi. Legitimacy of the Restorative Justice Principle in the Context of Criminal Law Enforcement. Indonesia Law Review, Vol 4, No 2 (2014): 196-214

[13] Tim Advokasi dan Pembaharuan Hukum KPK. 2014. Anotasi Delik Korupsi dan delik Lainnya yang Berkaitan dengan Delik Korupsi Dalam RUU KUHP. KPK. Jakarta.

[14] Zvonimir Paul Separovic.1985. Victimology Studies of Victims. Zagreb.Samobor-Navaki. Pravni Fakultet.