IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 4 - Issue 11, November 2015 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Soybean (Glycine Max (L) Merill) Promiscuity Reaction To Indigenous Bradyrhizobia inoculation In Some Ghanaian Soils

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Phanuel Y. Klogo, Johnson K. Ofori, Harrison Amaglo

 

KEYWORDS

Key words: Bradyrhizobiumjaponicum Effectiveness. Inoculation.Non-promiscuous soybean.Promiscuous soybean.

 

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: For many tropical countries particularly in Africa, Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF) continues to be the most promising alternative or supplement to the use of chemical Nitrogen fertilizers for sustainable Agriculture. In contrast to cowpea that nodulate profusely in tropical soilswith the naturally occurring bradyrhizobia, nodulation and nitrogen fixation in the American-type soybean in similar environments has largely depended on inoculating bradyrhizobia into the soil. The development of the Tropical Glycine Cross (TGx) soybean varieties by IITA has made it possible for these promiscuous varieties to nodulate with the naturally occurring strains belonging to the cowpea Bradyrhizobiumspp. The Most Probable Number (MPN) technique was used to determine the bradyrhizobial population in these soils. Eighty four Bradyrhizobium isolates obtained from randomly selected nodules on soybean were assessed for effectiveness in nitrogen fixation. Three of the most effective isolates were used in inoculation studies carried out in the greenhouse atthe University of Ghana-Legonon three promiscuous soybean varieties, Anidaso (TGx 813-6D), TGx 1903-8F and TGx 1448-2E and a non- promiscuous genotype, Davis, in three Ghanaian soil series, Toje (Chromic cambisols), Chichiwere (Dystricfluvisol) and Bekwai (Ferric acrisols). There were tremendous inoculation responses in these soils for both the promiscuous and non-promiscuous cultivars, with even the promiscuous ones responding better to inoculation than the non-promiscuous Davis. Inoculation gave rise to significant increases in nodule number, nodule dry weight, shoot dry weight and total nitrogen accumulation compared to the uninoculated control even intheChichiwere soil series which harboured the highestpopulation of indigenous bradyrhizobia, suggesting that the populations of the naturally occurring bradyrhizobia in these soils were either not highly competitive or sufficient for optimum nodulation and nitrogen fixation. For all the symbiotic or growth parameters assessed, the four soybean varietieswere ranked as Davis

 

REFERENCES

[1] Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-Total.pp 1085-1121.In: methods of soil analysis. Chemical methods-SSSA Book series no 5. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy. Madison Wisconsin, USA

[2] Chapman, H.D., 1965. Cation Exchange methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbial properties (Black, C.A., et, al., education), American Society of Agronomy, Inc Madison, Wisconsin, pp 8991-9000.

[3] Cuttelan A.J and Hungria, M., 1994.Nitrogen nutrition and inoculation. In: Tropical Soybean Improvement and Production; Brazillian Agric. Research Ent, FAO of the United Nations. Rome.


[4] Danso, S.K.A., 1992. Biological nitrogen fixation in tropical Agro-systems: twenty years of biological nitrogen fixation research in Africa. In Biological nitrogen fixation and sustainability of Tropical Agric. Pp 3-13. A wiley-sayce Co. Publication

[5] Danso, S.K.A and Owiredu J.D., (1988). Competitiveness of introduced and indigenous cowpea Bradyrhizobium strains, for nodule formation on cowpea [Vignaunguiculata (L) Walp] in three soils. Soil Biol and Bioc 20:305-310

[6] Djagbletey, D., 1995. The nitrogen fixing potential of soybean bradyrhizobia from three Ghanaian Soils.Mphil Thesis. Univ. of Ghana-Legon.

[7] Fening, J.O. &Danso, S.K.A, 2002., Variation of symbiotic effectiveness of cowpea bradyrhizobia indigenous to Ghanaian soils. App Soil Ecol 21:23-29

[8] Fening J O and Danso S K A, 2001.Response of cowpea to inoculation with indigenous Bradyrhizobium strains. Trop. Sci. 41, 172-176.
[9] Genstat., 2000. Genstat for windows, Release 4.14th ed. VSN International Ltd Oxford.

[10] Gyau, A.A., 2001. Nodulation promiscuity of soybean genotypes.Mphil.Thesis.Univ of Ghana- Legon.

[11] Isreal, D.W., 1993. Symbiotic dinitrogen fixation and host-plant growth during development of and recovery from phosphorus deficiency. Physiol. Plant. 88:294-300

[12] Kumaga, F.K, and Etu-Bonde, K., 2000.Response of two promiscuous soybean genotypes to bradyrhizobial inoculation in two Ghanaian soils. J. Ghana Association 2:99-104.

[13] Kumaga, F.K, and Ofori, 2004.Response of soybean [Glycine max (L) Merill] to bradyrhizobial inoculation and phosphorus application.Journal of Agric. And Biol. 2: 324-327

[14] Nangju, D., 1980. Soybean response to indigenous rhizobia as influenced by cultivar origin.Agron. J. 72:403-406.

[15] Okogun, J.A and Sanginga, N., 2003. Can introduced and indigenous rhizobial strains compete for nodule formation by promiscuous soybean in the moist savanna agro-ecological zone of Nigeria? Biol. Fertl. Soils. 38:26-31

[16] Okereke, G.U., Onochie, C.C., Onukwo, E., and Ekejundu, G.O., 2000. Response of introduced Bradyrhizobium strains infecting a promiscuous soybean cultivar. World J. Microbiol.Biotech. 16:43-48

[17] Pulver, E.L., Brockman, F., Wein, H.C., 1982.Nodulation of soybean cultivars with Rhizobiumspp and their response to inoculation with R. japonicum. Crop Sc. 22:1065-1070.

[18] Pulver, E.L., Kueneman, E.A., Ranga-Rao, V., 1985.Identification of promiscuous nodulating soybean.Efficient in N2- Fixation. Crop Sc. 25:660-663.

[19] Sanginga, N., Thottapilly G., and Dashiell K., 1999. Effectiveness of rhizobianodulating recent promiscuous soybean selections in the moist savanna of Nigeria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32:127-133.

[20] Singleton, P.W., Bohlool, B.B., Nakoo, P.L., 1992. Legume response to rhizobial inoculation in the tropics: myths and realities. In:myths and science of soils of the tropics. Soil Science Society of America.Special pub. 29:135-155.

[21] Somasegaran, P., and Hoben, H.J., 1985. Methods in Legume Rhizobium Technology.Hawaii Institute of Tropical Agric.And Human Resources.Univ. of Hawaii.

[22] Somasegaran P., and Hoben, H.J., 1994. Handbook for Rhizobium methods in Legume-Rhizobium Technology.Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

[23] Vincent, J.M., (1970). A manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule Bacterial I.B.P. Handbook No. 15.Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

[24] Woomer, P.W., Bennett, J., Yost, R., 1990. Overcoming the inflexibility of the most- probable-number procedures ,Agron. Journal 82:349-353.