IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 5 - Issue 12, December 2016 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



National Innovation System And Culture: A Cross-Country Analysis

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Joseph Gogodze

 

KEYWORDS

National innovation system, culture, Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, global innovation index, structural equation model

 

ABSTRACT

This study assesses the relationship between Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and the constituents of a National Innovation System (NIS). We consider an NIS as a special kind of intangible (latent) asset and identify its two constituents: input and output capital. These are extracted through a modern NIS measurement model, based on the Global Innovation Index. Using structural equation models, we show that power distance and uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation and indulgence vs. restraint, act through the latent constructs PDUA and LTIV, respectively. Moreover, individualism (IDV) and NIS constituents are directly and negatively affected by PDUA. IDV and LTIV directly and positively affect the NIS constituents. Further, the results show that masculinity vs. femininity significantly and negatively affects the NIS input constituent and significantly affects the NIS output constituent, but its impact is negative for high-income countries and positive for non-high income countries.

 

REFERENCES

[1] OECD/EUROSTAT. (2005). The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Oslo manual (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD Publishing.

[2] Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.

[3] Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). How do innovations affect economic growth? Some different approaches in economics. Report within the ISE Innovation Systems and European Integration. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.

[4] Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2001). Innovation: location matters. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 28–37.

[5] Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2004). New indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries (ArCo). World Development, 32(4), 629–654.

[6] UNCTAD. (2005). World investment report. Transnational corporations and the internationalization of R&D. Geneva: UNCTAD Publishing.

[7] UNIDO. (2005). Industrial development report. Capability building for catching-up. Historical, empirical and policy dimensions. Vienna: UNIDO Publishing.

[8] Chen, D., & Dahlman, C. (2005). The Knowledge Economy, the KAM Methodology and World Bank Operations. World Bank Institute Working Paper No. 37256, World Bank, Washington DC.

[9] European Commission. (2007). Global innovation scoreboard 2006. Brussels: Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.

[10] European Commission. (2008). European innovation scoreboard 2007. Brussels: Directorate-General for Enterprise and Industry.

[11] World Economic Forum (WEF). (2009). The global competitiveness report 2009–2010. Geneva: WEF.

[12] Boston Consulting Group/National Association of Manufacturers. (2009). The innovation imperative in manufacturing: How the United States can restore its edge. Boston: BCG. Retrieved from: http://www.bcg.com/documents/file15445.pdf.

[13] Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). (2009). A new ranking of the world’s most innovative countries. An Economist Intelligence Unit report sponsored by Cisco. Retrieved from: http://graphics.eiu.com/PDF/CiscoInnovation_Complete.pdf.

[14] INNO Metrics. (2011). Innovation union scoreboard 2010. Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.

[15] Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu for choice. Research Policy, 34(2), 175–194.

[16] Archibugi, D., Denni, M., & Filippetti, A. (2009). The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 917–931.

[17] Gogodze, J. (2013). The composite ECAICI: Positioning of Georgia’s innovative capacities in the Europe-Central Asia region. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2(9), 110–119.

[18] INSEAD. Global innovation index 2011; Global innovation index 2012;. Global innovation index 2013; Global innovation index 2014; Global innovation index 2015. Fontainebleau: INSEAD.

[19] Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

[20] House, R. J. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.

[21] Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182.

[22] Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2012). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

[23] Baskerville, R. F. (2003). Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), 1–14.

[24] Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127–150.

[25] Jones, M. (2007). Hofstede – Culturally questionable? Paper presented at the Oxford Business & Economics Conference, Oxford, UK. Retrieved from: http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1389&context = commpapers.

[26] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

[27] Kedia, B. L., Keller, R. T., & Julian, S. T. (1992). Dimensions of national culture and the productivity of R&D units. Journal of High Technology Management, 3(1), 1–18.

[28] Shane, S. (1992). Why do some societies invent more than others? Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 29–46.

[29] Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–73.

[30] Mumford, M. D., & Licuanan, B. (2004). Leading for innovation: Conclusions, issues, and directions. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 163–171.

[31] Efrat, K. (2014). The direct and indirect impact of culture on innovation. Technovation, 34(12), 12–20.

[32] Van Everdingen, Y. M., & Waarts, E. (2003). The effect of national culture on the adoption of innovations. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 217–232.

[33] Morris, M. H., Davis, D. L., & Allen, J. W. (1994). Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: Cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism and collectivism. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 65–89

[34] Nakata, C., & Sivakumar, K. (1996). National culture and new product development: An integrative review. Journal of Marketing, 60(1), 61–72.

[35] Deckert, C., Scherer, A., & Guillén, V. I. N. (2015). Cultural impacts on national innovativeness, Cologne Business School Working Paper 2015 No. 01. Retrieved from: http://www.cbs.de/fileadmin/cbs/pdf/Forschung/CBS_Working_Paper_Series/WP_CultInno_08102015v02.pdf

[36] Rinne, T., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2012). Hofstede and Shane revisited the role of power distance and individualism in national-level innovation success. Cross-Cultural Research, 46(2), 91–108.

[37] Rossberger, R., & Krause, D. (2012). National culture, heterogeneity and innovation: New insights into the relationship between the GLOBE dimensions and national level innovation. GSTF International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 2(1), 84–89.

[38] Strychalska-Rudzewicz, A. (2015). Cultural dimensions and innovation. Socio-Economic Problems and the State, 13(2), 59–67.

[39] Sun, H. (2009). A meta-analysis on the influence of national culture on innovation capability. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3/4(10), 353–360.

[40] Hofstede, G. (2015). National cultural dimensions. Retrieved from: www.geert-hofstede.com

[41] Esposito Vinzi, V., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 47–82). Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[42] Hwang, H., Malhotra, N. K., Kim, Y., Tomiuk, M. A., & Hong, S. (2010). A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 699–712.

[43] Wong, K. K. (2010). Handling small survey sample size and skewed dataset with partial least square path modelling. Vue: The Magazine of the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association, 20–23.

[44] Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Retrieved from: www.smartpls.com.

[45] Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral,

[46] Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. A. (2014). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE publications.