IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 6 - Issue 11, November 2017 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Analysis Of Factors Influencing Contract Time Extension In Projects Of Water Resources Sector For Public Works Department In East Kutai Regency

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Verasiana Yusuf, Subandiyah Azis, Edi Hargono Dwi Putranto

 

KEYWORDS

contract, projects, water resources.

 

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this research are: 1) to analyze the factors influencing the extension of contract time on the project, 2) to analyze the most dominant factors influencing the extension of contract time on the project, 3) to analyze the strategy to anticipate and avoid the extension of contract time projects of Water Resources Sector for Public Works Department of East Kutai Regency. The research that will be conducted is included into descriptive research to find out the factors that influence the extension of time towards contract implementation. This research uses survey method by collecting opinion, experience and respondent attitude regarding to problems that have been experienced in project work, by taking primary data through questionnaires and secondary data from related institutions. The result of this research shows that the factors that influence significantly the time extension are: (1) Material Factor with β coefficient value of 0,375; (2) Environmental factor with β coefficient of 0,357; (3) Change Factor with coefficient β value of 0,322. The most dominant factor in influencing the extension of contract time in th water resources sector for Public Works Department of East Kutai is the material factor with the most influential indicator of material scarcity with the highest communal value of 0,905.

 

REFERENCES

[1] J.G. Perry and R.W. Hayes, “Risk and Its Management in Construction Projects,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 499-521, 1985.

[2] I. Soeharto, Manajemen Proyek dari Konseptual sampai Operasional. Jakarta: Erlangga, 1999.

[3] S.A. Assaf and S. Al-Hejji, “Causes of Delay in Large Construction Projects,” International journal of project management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 349-357, 2006.

[4] J.M. Antill and Woodhead, “Critical Path Methode in Construction Practise, A Wiley Intercience Publication,” 1989.

[5] P. Zou, G. Zhang and J. Wang, “Understanding the Key Risks in Construction Projects in China,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 601-614, 2007.

[6] P. Soekimo, R. Wirahadikusuma and M. Abduh, “Sengketa dalam penyelenggaraan Konstruksi di Indonesia,” Proseding Seminar 25 tahun Pendidikan Manajemen dan Rekayasa Konstruksi, Institut Teknologi Bandung, 2005.

[7] Y. Frimpong, J. Oluwoye and L. Crawford, “Causes of Delay and Cost Overruns in Construction of Groundwater Projects in a Developing Countries; Ghana as a Case Study,” International Journal Of project management, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 321-326, 2003.

[8] H. Stone, J. Sidel, S. Oliver, A. Woolsey and R.C. Singleton, “Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis,” Descriptive Sensory Analysis in Practice, pp. 23-34, 2008.

[9] Sugiyono, Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2006.

[10] J.W. Creswell and V.L.P. Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. California: Sage Publications, 2007.