IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

IJSTR@Facebook IJSTR@Twitter IJSTR@Linkedin
Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
Scopus/Elsevier
CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT
QR CODE
IJSTR-QR Code

IJSTR >> Volume 9 - Issue 1, January 2020 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Project, Technology And Active (PROTECTIVE) Learning Model To Develop Digital Literacy Skills In The 21st Century

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Fatkhur Rohman, Ahmad Fauzan, Yohandri

 

KEYWORDS

Learning-based PROTECTIVE, digital literacy skills, physics learning.

 

ABSTRACT

This research aims to find out the impact of implementing a physics learning based on Project, Technology and Active (PROTECTIVE) learning model in building three digital literacy skills namely information literacy, media literacy, and ICT literacy. This research is an alternative solution to the students’ Skills and awareness to utilize and integrate technology in learning physics. The subject of this research is early semester students who took a basic physics course. The sample of the research is 71 students majoring in physics education from Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP) and Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol (UIN IB). Data on digital literacy Skills is obtained through performance observation and assessment of structured task reports during the learning process. The instruments used are observation sheets and analytic rubrics. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics interpreted in 4 rating scales, they are: very good, good, fair and poor. Based on the results of the observation at the stage of the project, project and practicum tests, there were 13% of students experiencing little difficulty in using, managing and evaluating information data from the technology software or platform for physic learning. The analysis result of research samples from UNP and UIN IB respectively suggests that 20% and 23% of students achieve very good predicate in information literacy skills, the good predicate has a considerable portion of 64% and 69%, The remaining 16% and 8% fall into the fair predicate. On the assessment of media literacy, there were 18% and 12% of students who fall into a very good predicate of 78% and 81% and 4% and 8% fall into the good predicate. For very good predicate, ICT literacy Skills has 22% and 15% of students, while 62% and 62% of the students fall into good predicate. Besides, the rest of 16% and 23% of the students fall into the fair predicate. The conclusion of the achievement of these three literacies show that the digital literacy Skills achieved by students of UNP and UIN IB is said to be at a good level of 77% and 76%. The findings in this research are highly relevant and interesting in the world of education because the application of PROTECTIVE learning is one of the best solutions for teachers, lecturers and education managers to build digital literacy Skills for the participants in the 21st century.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Pozdnyakova, Ulyana A., Golikov, Vyacheslav V., Peters, Irina A., and Morozova, Irina A.. 2019. Genesis of the Revolutionary Transition to Industry 4.0 in the 21st Century and Overview of Previous Industrial Revolutions. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 E. G. Popkova et al. (eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. P 11-19.
[2] Ragulina, Yulia V., Alekseev, Alexander N., Strizhkina, Irina V. and Tumanov, Arseniy I. 2019. Methodology of Criterial Evaluation of Consequences of the Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 E. G. Popkova et al. (eds.), Industry 4.0: Industrial Revolution of the 21st Century. P 235-244.
[3] Alismail, Halah Ahmed. and McGuire, Patrick. 2015. 21st Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice. Vol.6, No.6, 2015. 150-154.
[4] Erdogan, Niyazi and Bozeman, Todd Dane. 2015. Models of Project-based learning for the 21st century. A. Sahin (Ed.), A Practice-based Model of STEM Teaching, 31–42. Sense Publishers. All rights reserved.
[5] Gijsbers, G. and van Schoonhoven, B. 2012. The future of learning: a foresight study on new ways to learn new skills for future jobs. European Foresight Platform (EFP) Brief, No. 222.
[6] Scott, Cynthia Luna. 2015. The Futures of Learning 2: What Kind of Learning for The 21st Century?. Education Research and Foresight Working Papers No 14. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 1-14.
[7] Trilling, B. & Fadel, C., 2009. 21st Century learning skills. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
[8] Hugerat, Care. 2016. How teaching science using project-based learning strategies affects the classroom learning environment. Learning Environ Res (2016) 19:383–395.
[9] Hussin, Anealka Aziz. 2018. Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies. Volume: 6 Issue: 3. P 92-98.
[10] McGrath, D. (2002). Getting started with project-based learning. Learning and Leading with Technology, 30(3), 42-50.
[11] Rohman, F., Fauzan, A., and Yohandri. 2019. Integration of technology in project based learning with tracker on practicum activities. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series1185 (2019) 012036.
[12] Ananiadou, K. and Claro, M. 2009. 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41. Paris, OECD Publishing.
[13] Huang, Ronghuai. Spector, J. Michael. Yang, Junfeng. (2019). Educational Technology A Primer for the 21st Century. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[14] Pheeraphan, Nutteerat. 2013. Enhancement of the 21st Century Skills for Thai Higher Education by Integration of ICT in Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 103. 13th International Educational Technology Conference. P 365 – 373.
[15] Park, Chan Jung., Kang, Jae Hee., Kim, Myung Jin., Yu, Ye Rim., Kim, Hyo Sang., and Hyun, Jung Suk. (2013). Development of smart phone Apps as active learning yools for U-learning and its learning process for middle school students. Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 214: 851–859.
[16] Thinnukool, Orawit. 2018. Analysis of the Use of Social Network in the 21st Century Active Learning for Undergraduate Students Based on the Subject of Rapid Application Development. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management Vol. 15, No. 3 (2018) 1850020 (14 pages). DOI: 10.1142/S0219877018500207.
[17] Belshaw, Douglas A.J. 2011. What is ‘digital literacy’?. Dissertation. England: Durham University.
[18] Presiden Republik Indonesia. (17 Januari, 2012). Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2012. Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia: Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
[19] Bottino, R. M., & Robotti, E. (2007). Transforming classroom teaching & learning through technology: Analysis of a case study. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 174–186.
[20] ChanLin, L-J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55-65.
[21] Colley, K. 2008. Project-based science instruction: A primer. The Science Teacher, 75, 5–9.
[22] Dogan, Bulent and Robin, Bernard. (2015). Technology’s Role in stem education and the stem SOS model. A. Sahin (Ed.), A Practice-based Model of STEM Teaching, 77–94. Sense Publishers. All rights reserved.
[23] Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and assessment of project-based learning in a flexible environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 255-272.
[24] Violeta, Liliana. 2011. A New Way of Training - Project-Based Learning. The 7th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest, April 28-29, 2011.