International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020


IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 1, January 2019 Edition

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616

Implementation Of Cooperative Learning Type STAD In Increasing Student Independence And Learning Outcomes

[Full Text]



Saimun, Hanafi, Alkusaeri



Learning Independence, Learning Outcomes, STAD Method.



This study aims to measure the effectiveness of the Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) method in increasing student independence and learning outcomes. The research team conducted an experiment with the type of one group pretest-posttest design on 66 seventh grade students of junior high school. This research is a quantitative research with research instruments consisting of observation sheets, questionnaires and essay tests based on the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach. Questionnaires are used to assess students' personal independence aspects including ability (1) personal regulation, (2) work habits, and (3) learning environment. Then to answer the research hypothesis, we use the student test (t-test) which begins with the normality test and homogeneity test for the data obtained from the field. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that the STAD method has a significant contribution in increasing students' independence and learning outcomes on mathematics subjects.



[1] Adam, M. (2015) “Information and Communication Technology Usage by Junior High School Students In Ablekuma Central Sub-Metro District, Accra”, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4 (5), pp. 169-177.

[2] Amir, H. M. D and Ashrafosadat, P. (2016) “Relation between Team Motivation, Enjoyment, and Cooperation and Learning Results in Learning Area Based on Team- based Learning among Students of Tehran University of Medical Science”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230 (12), pp. 184-189.

[3] Chiel van der Veen and Bert van Oers. (2017) “Advances in Research on Classroom Dialogue: Learning Outcomes and Assessments”, Learning and Instruction, 48 (4), pp. 1-4.

[4] Chogo C.N., Githua, B. N., Changeiywo, J.M. (2017) “Effect Of Open Ended Teaching Learning Approach On Secondary School Students’ Mathematics Achievement In Learning Three Dimensional Geometry”. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 6 (12), pp. 273-277.

[5] Clara Viegas, et al. (2018) “Impact of a Remote Lab on Teaching Practices and Student Learning”, Computers & Education, 126 (11), pp. 201-216.

[6] Cole, Peter George & Lorna Chan. (1994) “Teaching Principle and Practice”. Canberra: Prentice.

[7] Corsini, Raymond J. (1994) “Encyclopedia of Psychology”. Toronto: Sons Incorporation.

[8] Cruickshank, Donald R, Deborah L. Bruner & Kim K Metcalf. (2006) “The Act of Teaching”. Beduque Mc Grow Hill.

[9] Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R.T. (1987) “Learning Together and Alone: Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning”. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota.

[10] David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson, and Mary Beth Stanne. (2000) “Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis”. University of Minnesota: 60 Peik Hall, pp. 1-30.

[11] David W. Johnson and Roger Johnson. Cooperative learning and teaching citizenship in democracies. International Journal of Educational Research, Volume 76, 2016, pp. 162-177.

[12] Drew Polly, et al. (2015) “Linking Professional Development, Teacher Outcomes, and Student Achievement: The Case of A Learner-Centered Mathematics Program for Elementary School Teachers”, International Journal of Educational Research, 72, pp. 26-37.

[13] Eugene F. Thibadeau. (2015) “Open Education: Learning and Teaching”. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), pp. 227-230.

[14] Hery Suharna, Abubakar Kadir, Nurningsih Hi Abdullah. (2018) “The Results Of Prototype Test Media Of Mathematical Electronic Reflective Book In Mathematics Learning”. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7 (10), pp. 81-86

[15] Israa M. Alkhasawneh, et al. (2008) “Problem-Based Learning (PBL): Assessing Students’ Learning Preferences Using Vark”. Nurse Education Today, 28 (5), pp. 572-579.

[16] Jamal Khalifa Mohammed Taleb Al Marboui. (2018) “Spare Periods and The Effect of Teacher’s Absence On Student’s Educational Attainments. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7 (6), pp. 70-72.

[17] Jianpeng Guo. (2018) “Building Bridges to Student Learning: Perceptions of The Learning Environment, Engagement, and Learning Outcomes Among Chinese Undergraduates”. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59 (12), pp. 195-208.

[18] Kawita, P. and Panita, W. (2015) “Design of Cooperative Problem-based Learning Activities to Enhance Cooperation Skill in Online Environment”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174 (12), pp. 2184-2190.

[19] Marlies, B., Eva, K., Katrien, S., and Filip, D. (2010) “Using Student-Centred Learning Environments to Stimulate Deep Approaches To Learning: Factors Encouraging or Discouraging Their Effectiveness”, Educational Research Review, 5 (3), pp. 243-260.

[20] Noel Entwistle. (2018) “Chapter 4: Learning From the Student’s Perspective”, Student Learning and Academic Understanding, pp. 45-63.

[21] Noel Entwistle. (2018) “Chapter 12: Student Learning, Understanding, and Implications for Teaching”, Student Learning and Academic Understanding, pp. 237-268.

[22] Slavin, R.E. (1999) “Cooperative Learning Theory, Research, and Practice”, Second Edition. London: Allyn and Bacon.

[23] Stahl, R.J. (1994) “Cooperative Learning in Social Studies. A Handbook for Teachers”, Arizona: Adisson-Wesley.

[24] Tagor, A. H., Asep, S., Etty, R., and Bambang, I. (2018) “The Relationship between Clean School Environment and Student’s Clean Lifestyle Behaviour in Indonesia Junior and Senior High School. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7 (3), pp. 100-104.

[25] Tisha L. N. Emerson, Linda English, and KimMarie McGoldrick. (2016) “Cooperative Learning and Personality Types”. International Review of Economics Education, 21 (1), pp. 21-29.

[26] Tracy L. Durksen, Robert M. Klassen, and Lia M. Daniels. (2017) “Motivation and Collaboration: The Keys to a Developmental Framework for Teachers’ Professional Learning”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 67 (10), pp. 53-66.