IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 4, April 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



The Government Readiness For E-Planning Implementation To Development Planning In Indonesia With Budget Availability As Intervening Variable

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Mudrika Alamsyah Hasan, Amir Hasan, Gusnardi, Iskandar Muda

 

KEYWORDS

Central Government Support, the Head of The Region Support, Legislative Support, Budget Availability and Effectiveness of E-Planning Implementation.

 

ABSTRACT

This research aims to determine the supporting factors of the government readiness for e-planning implementation to the district/city development planning in Indonesia. The variables used in this research were central government support, the head of the region support, and legislative support as independent variables (X), effectiveness of e-planning implementation as dependent variable (Y), and budget availability as intervening variable. The data of this research were obtained using questionnaires. The questionnaires that could be further processed were as much as 182 questionnaires. The hypothesis was analyzed using Structural Equation Model (SEM) with the help of SmartPLS software3.0. The results of this research are the central government support has positive effect on the budget availability. The head of the region support has no effect on budget availability. Legislative support positively affect the budget availability. Budget availability has positive effect on the effectiveness of e-planning implementation.

 

REFERENCES

[1]. Brimkulov, U., & Baryktabasov, K. 2018. E-Government Development in the Central Asian States: Best Practices, Challenges and Lessons Learned. In International E-Government Development (pp. 121-154). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[2]. Brimkulov, U., & Baryktabasov, K. 2018. E-Government Development in the Central Asian States: Best Practices, Challenges and Lessons Learned. International E-Government Development (pp. 121-154). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[3]. Daksueva, O., & Lin, J.J.Y. 2018. The Role of Provinces in Decision-Making Processes in China: The Case of Hainan Province. In Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea (pp. 77-96). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[4]. David, N. 2018. Democratizing government: What we know about e-Government and civic engagement. In International E-Government Development (pp.73-96). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[5]. Dickson. 2017. OECD Member States (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). Retrieve on https://ilmupengetahuanumum.com/negara-anggota-oecd-organisation-economic-co-operation-development/ (Acceses on 19 February, 2018)

[6]. Ebrahimi, M. 2018. Scenario Planning for Technical Knowledge Development. In Modeling and Simulation Techniques for Improved Business Processes (pp. 50-74). IGI Global.

[7]. Gamayuni, R.R. 2018. The Effect of Internal Audit Function Effectiveness and Implementation of Accrual Based Government Accounting Standard on Financial Reporting Quality. Accounting Standar Journal. Vol.21(1). 77-89.

[8]. Garcia-Garcia, L.M., & Gil-Garcia, J.R. 2018. Enacting Digital Government Services for Noncitizens: The Case of Migration Services. In User Centric E-Government (pp. 167-182). Springer, Cham.

[9]. Henning, C., Hedtrich, J., Sene, L. M., & Krampe, E. 2018. Whither Participation? Evaluating Participatory Policy Processes Using the CGPE Approach: The Case of CAADP in Malawi. In Development Policies and Policy Processes in Africa (pp. 271-307). Springer, Cham.

[10]. Liao, Y. 2018. Toward a Pragmatic Model of Public Responsiveness: Implications for Enhancing Public Administrators’ Responsiveness to Citizen Demands. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.41(2), 159-169.

[11]. Lindé, J. 2018. DSGE models: still useful in policy analysis?. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.34(1-2), 269-286.

[12]. Maher, M. H., Fakhar, M. S., & Karimi, Z. 2018. The relationship between budget emphasis, budget planning models and performance. Journal of Health Management and Informatics, Vol.5(1), 16-20.

[13]. Manes Rossi, F., Brusca, I., & Aversano, N. 2018. Financial sustainability as a driver for transparency and e-democracy: a comparative study in Italian and Spanish local governments. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.41(1), 22-33.

[14]. Miyazaki, T. 2018. Examining the relationship between municipal consolidation and cost reduction: an instrumental variable approach. Applied Economics, Vol.50(10), 1108-1121.

[15]. Musafir, V.E.N. 2018. Brazilian e-Government policy and implementation. In International E-Government Development (pp. 155-186). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[16]. Musafir, V.E.N. (2018). Brazilian e-Government policy and implementation. In International E-Government Development(pp. 155-186). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[17]. Okamuro, H., & Nishimura, J. 2018. Governance and Performance of Publicly Funded R&D Consortia. In Innovation in the Asia Pacific (pp. 147-159). Springer, Singapore.

[18]. Praharaj, S., Han, J. H., & Hawken, S. 2018. Towards The Right Model Of Smart City Governance In India. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, Vol.13(2), 171-186.

[19]. Priano, F. H., Armas, R. L., & Guerra, C. F. 2018. Developing Smart Regions: Proposal and Application of a Model for Island Territories. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), Vol.7(2). 89-114.

[20]. Rahman, R.A.T., Irianto, G., & Rosidi, R. (2019). Evaluation of E-Budgeting Implementation in Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta Using CIPP Model Approach. Journal of Accounting and Investment, Vol.20(1). 94-114.

[21]. Ran, J., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. 2018. Designing an Information Infrastructure for Policy Integration of Spatial Planning and Flood Risk Management. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), Vol.7(1), 53-85.

[22]. Regulations of the Minister of Home Affairs No.54 2010. with the existence of e-planning tools. Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta.

[23]. Russo, P., Lanzilotti, R., Costabile, M.F., & Pettit, C.J. 2018. Towards satisfying practitioners in using Planning Support Systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol.67, 9-20.

[24]. Turban, E., Outland, J., King, D., Lee, J.K., Liang, T.P., & Turban, D.C. 2018. Innovative EC Systems: From E-Government to E-Learning, E-Health, Sharing Economy, and P2P Commerce. In Electronic Commerce 2018 (pp. 167-201). Springer, Cham.

[25]. Uddin, S., Mori, Y., & Adhikari, P. 2018. Participatory budgeting in a local government in a vertical society: A Japanese story. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0020852317721335.

[26]. Uddin, S., Mori, Y., & Adhikari, P. 2020. Participatory budgeting in a local government in a vertical society: A Japanese story. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0020852317721335.

[27]. Valle de Souza, S., Dollery, B., & Kortt, M. A. 2018. Counting the cost: A critical evaluation of the Australian National Broadband Network roll-out under the Rudd/Gillard governments. International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.41(2). 129-136.

[28]. Xiao, K. 2018. Managing subnational liability for sustainable development: A case study of guangdong province. In Fiscal Underpinnings for Sustainable Development in China (pp. 163-187). Springer, Singapore.

[29]. Zagonari, F. 2018. Responsibility, inequality, efficiency, and equity in four sustainability paradigms: policies for a shared sea from a multi-country analytical model. Marine Policy, Vol.87. 123-134.

[30]. Zeng, D., Zhang, S., Gu, L., Yu, S., & Fu, Z. 2018. Quality-of-sensing aware budget constrained contaminant detection sensor deployment in water distribution system. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, Vol.103. 274-279.