|
Construction Of School Education In Tetralogy Novel Laskar Pelangi
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Hasan Suaedi, Anang Santoso, Wahyudi Siswanto, Yuni Pratiwi
KEYWORDS
education construction, schools, educational values, educational resources
ABSTRACT
The construction of school education in the Laskar Pelangi novel tetralogy in this study was examined using the theory of critical discourse analysis. The use of critical discourse analysis aims to reveal the construction of school education contained in the novel through the language features used by the author. The construction of school education in this research is defined as a process of socializing the values of life and knowledge. The process of school education construction in the Laskar Pelangi novel tetralogy is constructed by educators to students. Based on the results of the study found three points that are constructed in schools, namely the value of education, educational resources, and actors of educational transformation. Educational values in quotes 1 and 2 reveal the construction of education about discipline and maintaining dignity as students. The educational resources in quotes 3 and 4 are related to subjects in elementary school. Then the actors of educational transformation constructed by the teacher in quote 5 teach about arithmetic.
REFERENCES
[1] Berger, Peter L& Luckmann, Thomas. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York. 1966
[2] Andrews, Tom. What is Social Constructionism? Journal The Grounded Theory Review. 11, 39-46, 2012
[3] Ihejirika, Richard. Literature and English Language Teaching and Learning: A Symbiotic Relationship. Journal English Language Teaching, 7, 85-90, 2014
[4] Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical of Language. London. 1995
[5] Halliday M.A.K, Hasan R. Bahasa, Konteks, dan Teks: Aspek-aspek Bahasa dalam Pandangan Semiotika Sosial. Terjemahan Asruddin Barori Tou. Yogyakarta. 1992
[6] Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. London: 1989
[7] Van Dijk, Teun A. Ideology and Discourse Analysis. Journal Political Ideologies, 11, 115-140, 2006
[8] Gupta, N.K. Basic in Education. New Delhi. 2014
[9] Çeliköz, Nadir. Basic Factors that Affect General Academic Motivation Levels of Candidate Preschool Teachers. Journal Procedia Sosial and Behavioral Science,15, 1357-1365, 2009
[10] Vartolomei, Alina T. The Relationship Among Formal, Non-Formal and Informal Education. 2016
[11] Adiwikarta, Sudarja. 2016. Analisis Sosiologi Tentang Praksis Pendidikan. Bandung. 2016
[12] Damsar. Pengantar Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta. 2015
[13] Nasution. Sosiologi Pendidikan. Jakarta. 1999.
[14] Santoso, Anang. Studi Bahasa Kritis, Menguak Bahasa Membongkar Kuasa. 2012
[15] Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Fungcional Grammar, Edisi 4. London. 2014
[16] Tarigan, Guntur H. 1986. Pengajaran Sintaksis. Bandung. 1986
[17] Rahardi, Kunjana. Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta. 2005
|
