IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 5 - Issue 5, May 2016 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



Assessing Profitability Of Selected Agro-Ecological Intensification Techniques In Sorghum And Cassava Based Cropping Systems In Yatta Sub County, Kenya.

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Wango V.N., Mburu J., Onwong’a R., Nyikal R.

 

KEYWORDS

Agro-ecological Intensification, Profitability, Soil Management, Cassava, Sorghum, Yatta, Kenya.

 

ABSTRACT

As the world population increases there is pressure on agriculture to supply more food, fiber and fuel. This has led to the continual expansion of agricultural land in to arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) resulting in land degradation. In particular, in sub-Sahara Africa, low soil fertility is one of the most constraining factors to agriculture productivity. Initiatives to address soil fertility through use of inorganic fertilizers have yielded below average results in increasing productivity. Agro-ecological intensification (AEI) technique uses alternative knowledge and local materials to improve soils and increase productivity. This study assesses the economic returns of using AEI techniques compared to simplified conventional agricultural systems. Data was collected from on farm experiment that involved mono cropping, crop rotation and intercropping and application of organic inputs. Survey was used to collect data on farmers’ costs of production, yields and commodity prices from a sample of 140 households in Yatta, Kenya. Both plot and survey data showed that significantly greater revenues were attained with the application of the AEI practices. Using legumes in intercrop system with application of farmyard manure had the highest profit while crop rotation without application of organic input had the least. At least 28 percent of farmers that adopt all components of the AEI technique attained significantly higher profits than farmers without any organic inputs. The study concludes AEI is a profitable soil fertility management technique. Thus policy should recognize and promote its uptake.

 

REFERENCES

[1] Amit, R (2006). “Africa Fertilizer summit Outcomes and Follow-up,” http://www.tzdpg.or.tz/uploads/media/ifdc.pdf

[2] De Groote, H., Kimenju, S., Owour, G., and Wanyama, J (2006). ‘Market Liberalization and Agricultural Intensification in Kenya,’ Contributed Paper Presented on the 26th Conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economics (IAAE), Gold Coast, Australia

[3] De Jager, A., D. Onduru, M. S. van Wijk, J. Vlaming, and G. N.Gachini (2001). “Assessing sustainability of low-external-input farm management systems with the nutrient monitoring approach: a case study in Kenya,” Agricultural Systems 69(2001):99-118

[4] Jaetzold, R., H. Schmidt, B. Hornetz, and C. Shisanya (2006). Ministry of Agricuture Farm Management Handbook of Kenya VOL. II-2nd edition Part C Subpart C1. Nairobi, Kenya: Ministry of Agriculture, 2006.

[5] Karanja Lumumba. T, F.I. Mugivane, W.O. Ogara (2011). ‘Factors Influencing Adoption of Dairy Goats in Meru County, Kenya: prospects and Constraints,’ Journal of the Commonwealth Vet Ass Vol. 27 (1), pp5-14.

[6] Kristen, J., Dorward, A., Poulton, C., Omamo, W., and Vick, N (2008). “Institutional Economics Perspective on African Agricultural Development: Institutional and the Agricultural Development Challenges in Africa,”.

[7] Macharia, P, Kenya. Gateway to Land and Water Information: Kenya National Report, (2010). FAO(Food and Agriculture Organization). http://www.fao.org/ag/agL/ swlwpnr/reports/y_sf/z_ke/ke.htm

[8] Marenya, P. and C. Barrett (2009). “The Effect of Soil Quality on Fertilizer Use Rates among Smallholder Farmers in Western Kenya,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol 91(4):991-1006

[9] Mbuvi. J.P (2000). ‘Makueni District Profile: Soil Fertility Management ,’ Drylands Research Working Paper 6, Drylands Research, Crewkerne United Kingdom

[10] Mishra.A, A.Adhikari and S.Chintawar (2009). ‘Adoption of Technology and Its Impact on Profitability of Young and Beginning Farmers: A Quantile Regression Approach, Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia

[11] Munyao. C, Muisu. F, Mbego. J and Kiprutto. N (2013) ‘Comparison of Jatropha Curcas profitability of selected crops in Yatta District, Kenya.

[12] Namoi. N. L, R. N. Onwonga, C. M. Onyango, G. N. Karuku and V. M. Kathumo (2014). ‘Assessment of Soil Nutrient Balances in Organic Based Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Cropping Systems of Yatta Subcounty,’ American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, Vol 4(12): pp 1557-1578.

[13] Nkonya.E, Gerber.N, Von Braun.J. and Pinto. A (2011). ‘The Economics of Land Degradation. The Cost of Action versus Inaction.’ International Food Policy Research Institute Issue, brief 68

[14] Omotayo, O.E. and Chukwuka, K.S (2009). “Soil fertility restoration techniques in Sub Saharan Africa using organic resources,” “African Journal of Agricultural Research,” Vol 4 (3):144-150

[15] Onwu, A.C, Ayuba ,S.A. and Ali, A (2008). “The Effect of Organic Manure on the Growth and Yield of Castor Plant (Ricinus Cumunis),” Journal of Sustainable Development in Agriculture and Environment, Vol 3(2):64-70

[16] Place. F, C. Barrett, H.A. Freeman, J.J. Ramisch and B. Vanlauwe (2003). ‘Prospected for Integrated Soil Fertility Management Using Organic And Inorganic Inputs: Evidence From Smallholder Agricultural Systems,’ Food Policy Vol 28, p.p 365- 378

[17] Rogers, Everett M (1962). ‘Diffusion of Innovations,’ The Free Press. New York,

[18] UN General Assembly A/RES/68/232, (2014) www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?Symbol=A/RES/68/232

[19] USDA (1993). Soil Survey Manual. USDA Agricultural Handbook 18. Superintendent of Documents. Washington, DC,

[20] World reference base for soil resources (WRB) (2006) - A framework for international classification, correlation and communication.