|
The Implementation Of Government Accountability Performance System: A Case Study In Tidore Island City
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Saiful Deni, Thamrin Husain, Iswan Salim
KEYWORDS
Government management, implementation policy, bureaucratic structures.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) How the Implementation of the Government Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) in Tidore City; and (2) What factors are obstacles in implementing the Government Performance Accountability System. The research method used is qualitative research. This research was conducted in the City of Tidore Islands. The type of data used is primary data and secondary data obtained through interviews, document studies and observations. The results of the study show that as a system, SAKIP consists of components which constitute a single entity namely performance planning, performance measurement, performance reporting, and performance evaluation. the implementation of SAKIP in Tidore Islands City can be considered not optimal. The conclusion of this study is that in general the Tidore Islands City Government has not maximally implemented the SAKIP as part of the development of performance-oriented government management. In addition, to improve the performance of the Tidore Islands City Government there needs to be a change in the mindset that is oriented towards performance and commitment to implement performance management, improve communication, improve HR competencies and evaluate overlapping bureaucratic structures.
REFERENCES
[1] Lembaga Administrasi Negara dan BPKP, (2000), Akuntabilitas dan Good Governance, Jakarta.
[2] Mardiasmo, (2011), Taxation, Revised Edition, Andi, Yogyakarta.
[3] Mardiasmo, (2009), Public sector accounting. Andi, Yogyakarta.
[4] Priyatmo, T., & Akbar, R., (2019), Analysis of the Prospect of Implementing Activity-Based Costing (ABC) in Governmental Organisations: A Study at the State Treasury Office Jakarta IV, Journal of Accounting and Investment, 20(1), 1-22.
[5] Loh, C. G., (2019), Placemaking and implementation: Revisiting the performance principle. Land Use Policy, 81, 68-75.
[6] Van Stan, J. H., Dijkers, M. P., Whyte, J., Hart, T., Turkstra, L. S., Zanca, J. M., & Chen, C., (2019), The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: implications for improvements in research design, reporting, replication, and synthesis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 100(1), 146-155.
[7] Deni, S., Rasai, J., Saing, Z., (2019), Public Policy Analysis on Disaster Threat Due to Geo-Environmental Condition of Tugurara River in Ternate City, North Maluku Province, International Journal of Geomate, 17(60), 211-218.
[8] García-Cabrera, A. M., Durán-Herrera, J. J., Suárez-Ortega, S. M., (2019), Multinationals’ Political Activity for Institutional Change: Evidence from Spain during the International Crisis of 2008, European Management Journal.
[9] Anthony, R. N., Govindarajan, V., (2001), Management Control Systems, 10. Auflage, New York et al.
[10] McEvily, B., Perrone, V., Zaheer, A., (2003), Trust as an organizing principle, Organization science, 14(1), 91-103.
[11] Moleong, L. J., (2007), Qualitative Research Methods (revised). Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung. (In Bahasa)
[12] Sugiyono, (2012), Quantitative, Qualitative and R & D. Research Methods, Alphabet: Bandung. (In Bahasa)
[13] Huberman, M., Miles, M. B., (2002), The Qualitative Researcher's Companion, Sage.
|
