IJSTR

International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Home About Us Scope Editorial Board Blog/Latest News Contact Us
0.2
2019CiteScore
 
10th percentile
Powered by  Scopus
Scopus coverage:
Nov 2018 to May 2020

CALL FOR PAPERS
AUTHORS
DOWNLOADS
CONTACT

IJSTR >> Volume 8 - Issue 4, April 2019 Edition



International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research  
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research

Website: http://www.ijstr.org

ISSN 2277-8616



EFQM Excellence Model Based On Multi-Criteria Processes Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy TOPSIS, And Fuzzy VIKOR; A Comparative Survey

[Full Text]

 

AUTHOR(S)

Sama Raziei

 

KEYWORDS

European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM), Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchical Process (F-AHP), Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (F-DEMATEL), Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS), Fuzzy VIse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (F-VIKOR), Quality Management

 

ABSTRACT

In this study, a brief description of European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) excellence model of business was introduced based on Total Quality Management (TQM) concept. Then, an adaptation of EFQM excellence model of business with implementation of multi-criteria decision making processes including Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchical Process (F-AHP), Fuzzy Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (F-DEMATEL), Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference Similarity to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS), and Fuzzy VIse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (F-VIKOR) was investigated as a survey on the literatures. Detailed differences of these methods and their influences on the quality assessment policies were studied analytically. Such modified version of EFQM model based on such fuzzy processes was compared with the routine strategies of EFQM. Some different types of fuzzy numbers, defuzzification methods and the way of comparison among them were also discussed in this study. Finally by comparing the advantages and disadvantages of each method, hybrid approaches were found as the most effective method of organizational assessment.

 

REFERENCES

[1] R. Aguayo, Dr. Deming: The American who taught the Japanese about quality, Simon and Schuster, 1991

[2] S. Mehrdad, A New Framework Based on EFQM to Achieve Continuous Improvement in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), in, Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU)-Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi (DAÜ), 2015

[3] S. Spasos, A. Alexandris, G. Petropoulos, N. Vaxevanidis, Implementation of EFQM model in a greek engineering higher education institute: a framework and a case study, International Journal for Quality Research, 2 (2008) 43-49

[4] O. Uygun, S. Yalcin, A. Kiraz, E. Erkan, A novel assessment approach for EFQM driven institutionalization using integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods, Scientia Iranica, (2018)

[5] J. Samardžija, D. Kralj, EFQM excellence model 2010 solid framework for introducing environmental innovation, in: Recent Advances in Circuits Systems@ Signals, 2010

[6] N.M. Yaghoubi, M. Bandeii, J. Moloudi, An empirical study of the EFQM excellence model in Iran, International journal of Business and Management, 6 (2011) 260

[7] A. Van der Wiele, A. Williams, B. Dale, G. Carter, F. Kolb, D. Luzon, A. Schmidt, M. Wallace, Self-assessment: a study of progress in Europe’s leading organizations in quality management practices, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13 (1996) 84-104

[8] J.S. Oakland, Total organizational excellence, Routledge, 2007

[9] J.K. Eskildsen, K. Kristensen, H.J. Juhl, The causal structure of the EFQM excellence model, in: First International research conference on organisational excellence in the third millennium, Estes Park, CO, 2000, pp. 75-83

[10] L. Porter, S. Tanner, Assessing business excellence, Routledge, 2012

[11] C. Hakes, The corporate self assessment handbook: for measuring business excellence, Chapman & Hall, 1995

[12] Y.-L. Liu, P.-F. Ko, A modified EFQM Excellence Model for effective evaluation in the hotel industry, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29 (2018) 1580-1593

[13] S. Aydin, C. Kahraman, İ. Kaya, A new fuzzy multicriteria decision making approach: An application for European Quality Award assessment, Knowledge-Based Systems, 32 (2012) 37-46

[14] M. Gholamzadeh, M. Mojahed, An improved TOPSIS/EFQM methodology for evaluating the performance of organizations, Life Science Journal, 10 (2013)

[15] A. Ziaei, H. Alirezaee, A. Riyahi, P. Shirazi, Assess causal relationships of EFQM model criteria using fuzzy dematel (case study: Tovseeh Taavon bank)," International Business Management, 10 (2016) 2185-2189

[16] A. Najafi, E. Naji, Implementing the EFQM Model in the Calcimin Company Using the Fuzzy Hybrid Electre Approach, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9 (2016)

[17] E.K. Zavadskas, K. Govindan, J. Antucheviciene, Z. Turskis, Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: A review of applications for sustainability issues, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 29 (2016) 857-887

[18] T.L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, International journal of services sciences, 1 (2008) 83-98

[19] M. Alimardani, M. Rabbani, H. Rafiei, A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS for supplier selection in agile supply chains, International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 18 (2014) 179-211
[20] H.-Y. Wu, Y.-K. Lin, C.-H. Chang, Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard, Evaluation and Program Planning, 34 (2011) 37-50

[21] J.L. Yang, G.-H. Tzeng, An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (2011) 1417-1424

[22] G.-H. Tzeng, J.-J. Huang, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2011

[23] S. Opricovic, Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2 (1998) 5-21

[24] S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Multicriteria planning of post‐earthquake sustainable reconstruction, Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 17 (2002) 211-220

[25] S.N. Taati, A. Esmaili Dooki, A hybrid method of Fuzzy DEMATEL/AHP/VIKOR approach to rank and select the best hospital nurses of a Years: A case study, Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 4 (2017) 116-132

[26] E. Bottani, A. Rizzi, Strategic management of logistics service: A fuzzy QFD approach, International journal of production economics, 103 (2006) 585-599

[27] M.J. Paghaleh, Performance measurement by EFQM excellence model with fuzzy approach, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5 (2001) 1020-1024

[28] T. Terano, K. Asai, M. Sugeno, Fuzzy systems theory and its applications, Academic Press Professional, Inc., 1992

[29] J.C. Bou-Llusar, A.B. Escrig-Tena, V. Roca-Puig, I. Beltrán-Martín, An empirical assessment of the EFQM Excellence Model: Evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA Model, Journal of Operations Management, 27 (2009) 1-22
[30] J. Daniel, M. Naderpour, C.-T. Lin, A Fuzzy Multi-Layer Assessment Method for EFQM, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, (2018)

[31] U. Nabitz, N. Klazinga, EFQM approach and the Dutch Quality Award, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 12 (1999) 65-71

[32] P. Watson, Implementing the European foundation for quality management excellence model, in: International Congress Washington, DC USA, 2002, pp. 19-26.04

[33] H.-J. urgen Zimmermann, Fuzzy Set Theory| and Its Applications, in, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2nd, revised edition, 1991

[34] L. Sangwook, Application of AHP and Fuzzy AHP to Decision-Making Problems in Construction, in: 52nd ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings Copyright, 2016

[35] G. Kabir, M.A.A. Hasin, Comparative analysis of AHP and fuzzy AHP models for multicriteria inventory classification, International Journal of Fuzzy Logic Systems, 1 (2011) 1-16

[36] M. Pota, M. Esposito, Degrees of freedom and advantages of different rule-Based fuzzy systems, in: Proc. of The 2014 International Conference on Pure Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Computational Methods, 2014, pp. 17-19

[37] S.F. Mallak, D. Bedo, A Fuzzy Comparison Method For Particular Fuzzy Numbers, Journal of Mahani Mathematical Research Center (JMMRC), ISSN, 2251-7952

[38] Q.H. Do, J.-F. Chen, H. Hsieh, Trapezoidal fuzzy AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approaches for evaluating academic library service, WSEAS Transactions on Computers, 14 (2015) 607-619

[39] J. Daniel, R.M. Yusuff, J. Jassbi, Assessment System Based on Fuzzy Scoring In European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM): Business Excellence Model, (2011)

[40] J. Dodangeh, Modeling of Fuzzy Balanced Scorecard, Department of Industrial Management, (2006) 130

[41] J. Dodangeh, R.M. Yusuff, N. Ismail, M.Y. Ismail, M.R.B. Zadeh, J. Jassbi, Designing fuzzy multi criteria decision making model for best selection of areas for improvement in European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model, African Journal of Business Management, 5 (2011) 5010-5021

[42] D. Gharakhani, The evaluation of supplier selection criteria by fuzzy DEMATEL method, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2 (2012) 3215-3224

[43] S. Seker, E.K. Zavadskas, Application of fuzzy DEMATEL method for analyzing occupational risks on construction sites, Sustainability, 9 (2017) 2083

[44] S.-L. Si, X.-Y. You, H.-C. Liu, P. Zhang, DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018 (2018)

[45] S.K. Patil, R. Kant, A fuzzy DEMATEL method to identify critical success factors of knowledge management adoption in supply chain, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 12 (2013) 1350019

[46] D. Dalalah, M. Hayajneh, F. Batieha, A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for supplier selection, Expert systems with applications, 38 (2011) 8384-8391

[47] A. BaykasoğLu, V. KaplanoğLu, Z.D. DurmuşOğLu, C. ŞAhin, Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 40 (2013) 899-907

[48] G.R. Jahanshahloo, F.H. Lotfi, M. Izadikhah, Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181 (2006) 1544-1551

[49] N. Jalaliyoon, H. Taherdoost, M. Zamani, Utilizing the BSC and EFQM as a Combination Framework; Scrutinizing the Possibility by TOPSIS Method, International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), 1 (2011) 169-182

[50] İ. Ertuğrul, N. Karakaşoğlu, Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39 (2008) 783-795

[51] M.F. El-Santawy, A VIKOR method for solving personnel training selection problem, International Journal of Computing Science, 1 (2012) 9-12

[52] A. Asemi, M. Baba, R. Haji Abdullah, N. Idris, Fuzzy multi criteria decision making applications: a review study, (2014)

[53] C. Kahraman, N. Yasin Ateş, S. Çevik, M. Gülbay, S. Ayça Erdoğan, Hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS model for selection among logistics information technologies, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20 (2007) 143-168

[54] T. Özcan, N. Çelebi, Ş. Esnaf, Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem, Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (2011) 9773-9779

[55] E. Bottani, A. Rizzi, A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11 (2006) 294-308

[56] D.-Y. Chang, Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP, European journal of operational research, 95 (1996) 649-655

[57] F.R.L. Junior, L. Osiro, L.C.R. Carpinetti, A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing, 21 (2014) 194-209

[58] H. Dincer, U. Hacioglu, A comparative performance evaluation on bipolar risks in emerging capital markets using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS and VIKOR approaches, Engineering Economics, 26 (2015) 118-129

[59] S. Opricovic, G.-H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European journal of operational research, 156 (2004) 445-455

[60] V.Y. Chen, H.-P. Lien, C.-H. Liu, J.J. Liou, G.-H. Tzeng, L.-S. Yang, Fuzzy MCDM approach for selecting the best environment-watershed plan, Applied soft computing, 11 (2011) 265-275

[61] O. Taylan, A.O. Bafail, R.M. Abdulaal, M.R. Kabli, Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies, Applied Soft Computing, 17 (2014) 105-116

[62] J.-W. Wang, C.-H. Cheng, K.-C. Huang, Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection, Applied Soft Computing, 9 (2009) 377-386

[63] S. Naaz, A. Alam, R. Biswas, Effect of different defuzzification methods in a fuzzy based load balancing application, International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 8 (2011) 261

[64] N. Ramli, D. Mohamad, A comparative analysis of centroid methods in ranking fuzzy numbers, European Journal of Scientific Research, 28 (2009) 492-501

[65] G.M. Reddy, P. Kousalya, Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers in Extent Analysis Method in Fuzzy AHP, International Journal of Conceptions on Computing and Information Technology, 3 (2015) 69-71

[66] C.-T. Chen, C.-T. Lin, S.-F. Huang, A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management, International journal of production economics, 102 (2006) 289-301

[67] A.M. Noor, M.M. Fauadi, F. Jafar, M. Nordin, S. Yahaya, S. Ramlan, M.S.A. Aziz, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Integrations for Decision Making Purposes: A Review, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (JAMT), 11 (2017) 139-154

[68] M. Zeydan, C. Çolpan, A new decision support system for performance measurement using combined fuzzy TOPSIS/DEA approach, International Journal of Production Research, 47 (2009) 4327-4349

[69] H. Abbasimehr, M. Tarokh, A novel interval type-2 fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS approach for ranking reviewers in online communities, Scientia Iranica. Transaction E, Industrial Engineering, 23 (2016) 2355

[70] H. Farughi, A Hybrid Method Based on Fuzzy AHP and VIKOR for the Discrete Time-Cost-Quality Trade-off Problem, Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 9 (2016) 105-116

[71] A.T. Herat, R. Noorossana, E.S. Serkani, Using DEMATEL Analytic network process (ANP) hybrid algorithm approach for selecting improvement projects of Iranian excellence model in healthcare sector, African Journal of Business Management, 6 (2012) 627-645

[72] L. Abdullah, N. Zulkifli, Integration of fuzzy AHP and interval type-2 fuzzy DEMATEL: An application to human resource management, Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (2015) 4397-4409

[73] R. Kuo, C. Hsu, Y. Chen, Integration of fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating carbon performance of suppliers, International journal of environmental science and technology, 12 (2015) 3863-3876