Feasible Catched Analysis Of Katsuwonus Pelamis Linnaeus In Three Different Location
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Asia, Moh. Zaini, Jenny I. Manengkey, Yuli Purwanto, John Tumiwa, Jerry D. Kalesaran
KEYWORDS
purse seine, Katsuwonus pelamis, skipjack tuna, pole line, Bitung
ABSTRACT
The objectives of the research is to study the condition of skipjack tuna especially feasibility of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis Linnaeus) catched at three different locations using purse seine and pole line. The research was held January to December 2016 in Bitung, North Sulawesi at three different location as a fishing ground. Fishing gear of K. pelamis in the experiment is purse seine and pole line. The result was showed difference of feasible and unfeasible catched of K. pelamis based location and fishing gear. The experiment used purse seine fishing gear is a non-selective fishing tool, while the pole line is a fishing tool that is very easy to apply, environmentally friendly and selective. This is great importance in fishery assessments and sustainability of K. pelamis in Bitung.
REFERENCES
[1]. Andrade H.A and Santos J.A.T. (2004). Seasonal Trends in The Recruitment of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) to The Fishing Ground in The Southwest Atlantic. Fisheries Research 66: 185-194.
[2]. BPS Bitung (2014). (access date 24 November 2012).
[3]. Broomhead D., Foster J., Attard R., Findlay J and Kalish J. (2003). A Review of The Impact of Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) on Tuna Fisheries. Final Report to The Fisheries Resources.
[4]. Dempster T and Taquet M. (2004). Fish Aggregation Devices (FADs) Research ; Gaps in Current Knowledge and Future Directions for Ecological Studies. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 14: 21-41.
[5]. Druon J.N., Chassot E., Murua H and Soto M., (2016). Preferred Feeding Habitat of Skipjack Tuna in The Eastern Central Atlantic and Western Indian Oceans : Relation With Carrying Capacity and Vulnerability to Pursue Seine Fishing. IOTC-2016_WPTT18-31.
[6]. Fafioye O,O and Oluajo O,A (2005). Length-Weight. Relationship of Five Fish Species in Epe Lagoon, Nigeria. African Journal Of Biotechnology 4(7):749-751.
[7]. Hallier J.P and Gartner D. (2008). Drifting Fish Aggregation Devices Could Act as Ecological Trap for Tropical Tuna Species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 353 : 255-264.
[8]. Kalayci F, Samsun N., Bilgin S and Samsun O. (2007). Length-Weight Relationship of Ten Caught by Bottom Trawl and Midwater Trawl From The Middle Black Sea, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 7:33-36 (access date 20 November 2014).
[9]. Kekenusa, S. J. (2006). Analisis Penentuan Musim Penangkapan Ikan Cakalang (Katsuwonus pelamis) Di Perairan Sekitar Bitung Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal. Vol.13 No.1.Th.2006.
[10]. Lewison R.L., Freeman S.A and Crowder L.B. (2004). Quantifying the Effect of Fisheries on Threatened Species. Ecology Letters 7: 221-231.
[11]. Manik. N. (2007). Beberapa Aspek Biologi Ikan Cakalang (Katsuwonus pelamis) di Perairan Sekitar Pulau Seram Selatan dan Pulau Nusa Laut. Jurnal Oseanologi dan Limnologi 33: 17–25. ISSN 0125 – 9830.
[12]. Sparre P., Ursin E and Venema S.C. (1989). Introduction to Tropical Fish Stock Assessment. Part I Manual. FAO Rome, Italy.
|