|
The Legal Policy Of The General Election
As An Independent Commission (A Review Of Indonesian Election 2014)
[Full Text]
AUTHOR(S)
Josner Simanjuntak
KEYWORDS
Index Terms: Election, Election System, Legal Policy
ABSTRACT
Abstract: The Legal Institution of the General Election in Indonesia has an important role in the process of elections to realize the sovereignty of the people. The legal institution is independent as mandated of the Indonesian constitution (The 1945 Constitution). In the Election organizers as a chapter of the 1945 Constitution, stating that the Election Commission shall be independent and impartial toward participating in the election and political party. However in practice this task is not easy and can be run smoothly it is difficult to maintain a balanced relationship between the participant election commissions. This research is a descriptive analytic one using juridical normative approach to study the legal principles, legal synchronization. The technique being used to gather data is librarian research supported by field research using interview and questionnaire technique. The data being gathered are analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research shows that the legal institution the general election in undertaking has not been independent as expected, because for institutional and administrative for has not been independence and not impartiality and not professionalism. The rules in the process of elections is it not the election system and achievement of justice.
REFERENCES
[1] Andi Pangerang. 1999. Prinsip Permusyawaratan Rakyat Berdasarkan Pasal 18 Undang Undang Dasar 1945 dan Implementasinya Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan di Daerah. (Dissertation). Unpublished. Graduate School of Padjajaran University. Bandung
[2] Budiman. 2013. Proses Rekrutmen Politik. Available on: http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2013/09/05/1018475/Proses. Rekrutmen. Politik. Neneknya.Korupsi Accessed, 26 November 2013.
[3] Bulls Tryckeri. Source available on: http://www.idea.int/publications/pub electoral_main.html Accessed 17 August 2014.
[4] Didi Suprianto. 2007. Menjaga Independensi Penyelenggara Pemilu. Perludem. Jakarta.
[5] Ebta Setiawan, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) Online developed by EBTA Setiawan © 2012-2014 Version 1.3. Development and coaching body language, Kemendikbud Language Center. Source: http://ebsoft.web.id
[6] Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 2002. Standar-Standar Internasional Pemilihan Umum: Pedoman Peninjauan Kembali Kerangka Hukum Pemilu. IDEA. Jakarta.
[7] Jimly Asshiddiqie, 1993. Gagasan Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Konstitusi dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia: Pergeseran Keseimbangan antara Individualisme dan Kolektivisme Dalam Kebijakan Demokrasi Politik dan Demokrasi Ekonomi Selama Tiga Masa Demokrasi. 1945-1980-an. (Dissertation). Graduate School of Indonesia University. Jakarta.
[8] M. J. Manulang, 1981. Dasar-dasar Manajemen. Gramedia. Jakarta.
[9] Muchlis Hamdi. 2007. “State Auxiliary Bodies di Beberapa Negara”, Presented in a legal and non-legal dialogue "Structuring the State Auxiliary Bodies in the constitutional system" Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, National Law Development Agency in collaboration with the Faculty of Law, University of Airlangga, Surabaya, 26-29 June 2007.
[10] National Law Development Agency, Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, 2011. Final Report Legal Research. “Tentang Efektifitas Badan Kehormatan DPR/DPRD 2011”. Jakarta.
[11] Ni’matul Huda. 2009. Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah. Nusa Media. Alumni, Bandung.
[12] P Laslett and J Fishkin (ed). 1979. Philosophy Politics and Society. Fifth series. New Haven: Yale University Press.
[13] Romi Librayanto 2009. Ilmu Negara Suatu pengantar. Pustaka Refleksi. Makassar.
[14] Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji. 1985. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, First edition. Rajawali Press. Jakarta.
|
